21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

168 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />

as IS ':'adl, IS f4 or IS 'ii'hS gives<br />

White good compensation according<br />

to Yusupov, and Black cannot play<br />

13 .. :ii'xd4? in view of 14 .thS 0-0 IS<br />

.l:[ad I! lDxd 1 16 ':'xd 1 'if'b6 17 lDxf7<br />

':'xf7 18 'if'g6+ ':'g7 19 'ii'e8+ 'it'h7 20<br />

.teS and Black cannot prevent mate,<br />

beginning with .tg6+ - Yusupov.<br />

b2) 12 ... lDd713.thS 0-0 14lDxf7!?<br />

':'xf7 IS .txf7+ 'it'xf7 16 'if'c2 lDdf6<br />

17 .teS with some compensation, Yusupov-Akopian,<br />

Ubeda 1997. White<br />

ideally wants to open the f-file; in the<br />

game this was carried out after the preliminary<br />

g4, so as to avoid Black answering<br />

f4 with ... g4.<br />

B<br />

10 •.. g4!?<br />

After this White has to show compensation<br />

for two pawns, and it is clear<br />

that if Black survives the middlegame<br />

he will be in a position to cash in the<br />

full point without much trouble. A<br />

safer option is 1O ... .tb7 11 0-0 lDbd7<br />

12lDeS hS 13 h3 h4 14 .th2 lDhS IS<br />

.txhS .l:[xhS 16 .l:[adl 'if'e7 17 lDxd7<br />

'if'xd7 18 dS!? cxdS 19 exdS .txc3 20<br />

'ii'xc3 i.xdS 21 ':'fel 1/2_ 1 /2 B.LaliC­<br />

Zhu Chen, Ubeda 1998. <strong>The</strong> oppositecoloured<br />

bishops mean that White has<br />

adequate counterplay for the two-pawn<br />

deficit.<br />

11 tDeS!<br />

This is much stronger than 11 lDd2<br />

'ii'xd4 12 0-0-0 'ii'b6, after which I<br />

doubt that White has enough compensation<br />

since the knight makes a rather<br />

clumsy appearance on d2 and thereby<br />

lessens White's pressure and influence<br />

on the centre substantially. In<br />

Ikonnikov-Prie, St Affrique 1994,<br />

White may have realized that Black<br />

can complete his development without<br />

too much trouble and hence went for<br />

13 .txc4?! bxc4 14lDxc4 and now instead<br />

of 14 ... 'if'a6 Black should play<br />

14 ... 'ii'cS, which Prie thinks is extremely<br />

good for Black; e.g., IslDd6+<br />

'it'e7 16 eS (or 16 a3 .txc3 17lDxc8+<br />

l:txc8 18 .td6+ 'if'xd6 19 .l:[xd6 ..ti>xd6<br />

20 'if'xc3 lDbd7 and Black is about to<br />

consolidate) 16 ... lDdS 17 .th4+ 'itd7<br />

18lDxf7 ':'f8 19lDd6 (19 'ii'h7 ..ti>c7!)<br />

19 ... 'it'c7 20 'if'h7+ lDd7 21lDde4 WaS<br />

+.<br />

11 .. :ii'xd4 12 0-0<br />

12 lDxg4!? is maybe stronger; for<br />

example, 12 ... lDxg4 13 .txg4 lDd7<br />

140-0 (14 .l:[dl Wg7 IS .te2 .tb7 16<br />

0-0 looks more promising for White)<br />

14 ... .tb7 IS .thS?! lDcs 16 .l:[fel<br />

O-O-O! 17 .txf7 'if'f6 18 .thS lDd3<br />

leading to an unclear game, Mellegers-Cifuentes,<br />

Dutch Ch (Enschede)<br />

1998.<br />

12 ... .txc3

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!