21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

162 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />

his king survives, but whether it does<br />

is far from clear.<br />

b) 8 .txc4 .txc3+ (8 ... g5 9 i.g3<br />

transposes to the note to Black's Sth<br />

move) 9 bxc3 "a5 10 0-0 lLlxe4 11<br />

tDe5 tDd7 12 "g4 g5 (12 ... tDxe5 13<br />

dxe5 tDg5 14 .txg5 hxg5 15 'ii'xg5 0-0<br />

is also clearly better for White) 13<br />

"xe4 tDxe5 (l3 ... gxh4 14 tDxf7 +-)<br />

14 dxe5 gxh4 15 ':abl h3 (the fact that<br />

Black's king cannot flee to the queenside<br />

just adds to his miserable state;<br />

e.g., 15 ..... c7 16 lIfdl i.d7 17 ':d6<br />

0-0-0 IS i.a6! bxa6 19 'ii'a4 a5 20<br />

"c4 ':dgS 21 'ii'a6+ rJi>dS 22 ':b7 'ii'cs<br />

23 "xa7 +-) 16 ':fdl':gS 17 g3 ':g5<br />

18 f4 and White is already winning,<br />

Kasparov-Korchnoi, Horgen 1995.<br />

8 i.g3 (D)<br />

B<br />

8 ..• b5<br />

Black obviously cannot allow White<br />

to capture the c-pawn so he lashes out<br />

to defend it. However, S ... i.b4 is another<br />

option, though nowadays rarely<br />

played. A reason might be that after 9<br />

"c2 Black can hardly do better than<br />

9 ... b5, which, at best, after 10 i.e2,<br />

transposes to Line B. If White is not<br />

satisfied with this, he can also try 9<br />

i.xc4 tDxe4 100-0, sacrificing a further<br />

pawn for a substantial lead in development.<br />

<strong>The</strong>n Black has a choice<br />

of three lines, all requiring extremely<br />

alert defence just to survive a miniature<br />

catastrophe:<br />

a) 10 ... i.xc3 11 bxc3 tDd7 (if<br />

Black plays 11...tDxc3, then White<br />

replies 12 'ii'el, intending i.xbS followed<br />

by 'ii'e5) 12 'ii'd3 f5 13 ':ael<br />

tDdf6 14 tDe5 0-015 f3 tDxg3 16 hxg3<br />

rJi>g7 17 lIe2 with excellent compensation<br />

for the pawn, Lputian-Boudre,<br />

Cappelle la Grande 1991.<br />

b) 10 ... tDxc3 11 bxc3 i.xc3 12<br />

lIcl i.a5 (l2 ... i.b4 might be better)<br />

13 tDe5 h5 14 i.e2! h4 15 i.h5 lIh7<br />

16 tDxf7 lIxf7 17 i.xf7+ (17 f4!?)<br />

17 ... c.fi>xf7 IS 'ii'h5+ rJi>fS 19 ':c5 i.d2<br />

20 i.e5 with a winning attack.<br />

c) 10 ... tDxg3 11 fxg3 tDd7 12 'ii'e2<br />

'ii'e7 13 a3 i.d6 14 lIael tDb6 15 tDe4<br />

tDxc4 16 'ii'xc4 0-017 tDe5 f5 IS tDg6<br />

'ii'eS 19 tDxd6 'ii'xg6 20 ':e5 ± Itkis­<br />

Szuhanek, Romanian Ch 1995. White<br />

wins back the pawn with continuing<br />

pressure.<br />

9i.e2<br />

This may actually seem a little slow<br />

at first sight but White needs to bring<br />

more forces into play before initiating<br />

an attack. Moreover, the move is very<br />

flexible, and thus White only decides<br />

where to attack after seeing how Black<br />

intends to develop. Here is a summary<br />

of the alternatives:

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!