Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
152 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SLAV<br />
spent two moves advancing the e<br />
pawn to e4.<br />
6 ... b57 a4 i.b4 (D)<br />
<strong>The</strong> most common but not necessarily<br />
the best. Here are a few alternatives:<br />
a) 7 ..... b6!? 8 i.e2 (8 i.xf6 gxf6 9<br />
axb5 cxb5 10 b3 is a very direct attempt<br />
to exploit Black's set-up but it<br />
failed in Keck-Maksimenko, Bern<br />
1994: 1O ... i.b4 11 'ii'c2 i.b7 12 bxc4<br />
bxc4 13 i.xc4 tiJd7 14 ~e2 ':c8 15<br />
tiJa4 "d6 and White was already in<br />
trouble) 8 ... a6 9 0-0 i.b7 10 tiJe5<br />
tiJbd7 11 b3 l:td8 12 tiJxd7 l:txd7 13<br />
i.xf6 gxf6 14 bxc4 b4 15 tiJe4 'ii'd8 =<br />
Mantovani-Nemeth, Budapest 1987.<br />
b) 7 ... a6 8 axb5 cxb5 9 i.xf6 gxf6<br />
10 tiJxb5 axb5!? 11 ':xa8 i.b4+ 12<br />
tiJd2 i.b7 transposes to the note to<br />
Black's 8th move.<br />
w<br />
8 tiJd2<br />
White has tried a large number of<br />
other moves here but this move, with<br />
the idea of taking on b5, or simple development,<br />
appears most logical.<br />
8 i.e2 is slower. White intends simply<br />
to complete his development, and<br />
argues that his better control of the<br />
centre is sufficient compensation for<br />
the pawn. Black has then tried:<br />
a) 8 ... h6 9 i.xf6 i.xc3+ 10 bxc3<br />
gxf6 11 0-0 tiJd7 12 tiJd2 'ilic7 13 'ii'bl<br />
a6 14 i.f3 i.b7 15 axb5 cxb5 16<br />
i.xb7 'iixb7 17 tiJxc4 fIIc7 18 tiJaS<br />
0-0 19 l:tc 1 tiJb6 with a roughly equal<br />
position, P.Nikolic-Illescas, Dubai OL<br />
1986.<br />
b) 8 ... tiJbd7 9 0-0 'ii'b6 10 fIIc2<br />
i.b7 11 e4 0-0 12 l:tadl a6 13 e5?!<br />
(this is rarely a good idea in such positions<br />
unless White is able to follow up<br />
with a direct attack) 13 ... tiJd5 14 tiJe4<br />
c5 15 tiJd6 cxd4 16 tiJxd4 tiJxe5 17<br />
tiJxb7 'ii'xb7 18 'ii'e4 i.d6 and White's<br />
compensation is obviously insufficient,<br />
Seul-Dokhoian, Bonn 1993.<br />
c) 8 ... i.b7 9 0-0 a6 10 tiJe5 tiJbd7<br />
11 i.f3 tiJxe5 12 dxe5 'ii'xdI13l:tfxdl<br />
i.xc3 14 axb5 axb5 15 l:txa8+ i.xa8<br />
16 bxc3 tiJd7 + Geller-Sveshnikov,<br />
USSR Ch (Moscow) 1976.<br />
8 ... i.b7<br />
I would very much advise against<br />
an early exchange on c3. White is not<br />
really threatening to take twice on b5<br />
since axb5 can almost always be met<br />
by ... i.xc3. Clearly, White has more<br />
options available after, for example,<br />
8 ... i.xc3?! 9 bxc3 than after 8 ... i.b7 9<br />
axb5 i.xc3 10 bxc3 cxb5, as in the latter<br />
case Black benefits from the a8-hl<br />
diagonal being open. 8 ... a6 is, however,<br />
also possible, and sometimes<br />
transposes to the main line, e.g. after 9