21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

7 a4 149<br />

on such a peculiar rook move may<br />

seem like a luxury, but 1O ... l:r.a7!? is<br />

actually not so stupid. <strong>The</strong> main idea<br />

is that it seeks to discourage 11 d5 in<br />

view of 11 ... l:r.d7, and the simple presence<br />

of a rook on the d-file limits<br />

White's options substantially. <strong>The</strong> development<br />

of the minor pieces can<br />

wait, for it is often quite handy to have<br />

the bishop defending e6. Also, if everything<br />

goes Black's way, it may<br />

even be possible to play ... c5, and then<br />

develop the knight actively on c6.<br />

Other options:<br />

a) 1O ... ttJd7 11 d5 l:r.b8 12 dxc6<br />

'tixc6 13 axb5 axb5 14 ttJd4 'iVc5 15<br />

b4 cxb3 16 ttJdxb5 i.e7 is unclear according<br />

to Hubner.<br />

b) 1O ... i.b7 and now:<br />

bI) 11 b3 with a further branch:<br />

bll) 1l...b4 12 as 'tic7 13 ttJa4 c3<br />

14 ttJb6 l:r.a7 15 d5 is actually not very<br />

clear. If Black just had time to kick the<br />

knight away from b6 with ... ttJd7 everything<br />

would be in order, but it is not<br />

that easy; in Stone-Nogly, Hamburg<br />

1993 Black failed to find a good defence,<br />

and soon succumbed to the attack:<br />

15 ... e5 16 i.c4 ttJd7 17 ttJh4<br />

ttJxb6 18 d6! 'tixd6 19 i.xf7+! 'it>xf7<br />

20 'tih5+ 'it'g8 21 axb6 lIa8 22 'iVg4+<br />

~f7 23 lIadl 'tic5 24 lId7+ i.e7 25<br />

ttJf5 :the8 26 ttJh6+ and mate next<br />

move.<br />

b12) 11...cxb3 12 'i'xb3 ttJd7 13<br />

d5 ttJc5 (13 ... cxd5 14 exd5 ttJc5 15<br />

'i'b4 ttJd7 16 'i'h4 b4 17 dxe6 fxe6 18<br />

ttJe4 is clearly better for White, Lerner-Kaidanov,<br />

Moscow 1985) 141i'bl<br />

i.e7 15 dxc6 1/2- 1 /2 Zakharevich-Savchenko,<br />

Russian Club Cup (Maikop)<br />

1998. Black would indeed have no<br />

problems after 15 ... i.xc6 16 axb5 axb5<br />

17 l:r.xa8+ i.xa8 18 i.xb5+ 'it>f8.<br />

b2) 11 d5!? (D) and then:<br />

B<br />

b21) 1l...b4?ismuchtoorisky: 12<br />

dxe6 fxe6 (12 ... bxc3 13 exf7+ 'it'xf7<br />

14 i.xc4+ ~e8 15 bxc3 ttJd7 16 l:r.bl<br />

'tic7 17 ttJd4 and White wins -<br />

Hubner) 13 as'tid8 14 'iVxd8+ ~xd8<br />

15 ttJa4 ttJd7 16 i.xc4 ± Lputian­<br />

Odeev, USSR 1985.<br />

b22) 11...i..c5 12 dxe6 fxe6 and<br />

now White has several ways to increase<br />

the pressure:<br />

b221) 13 e5!? ttJd7 14 exf6 0-0-0<br />

and here Lputian-Ribli, Sarajevo 1985<br />

was agreed drawn in this highly unclear<br />

position.<br />

b222) 13 b3 'tid8!? 14'i'cl (White<br />

can hardly count on anything after 14<br />

'iVxd8+ 'it>xd8 15 bxc4 b4 16 ttJbl<br />

ttJd7) 14 ... ttJd7 15 axb5 cxb5 16 bxc4<br />

b4 17 ttJa4 'i'e7 with a roughly balanced<br />

position, but one in which I

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!