Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 a4 145<br />
b) 10 exf6 gxh4 11 ~eS cS! 12<br />
'iWhS? (12 'ii'f3!? is stronger; Shirov<br />
then analyses 12 ... cxd4 130-0-0 "ikc7<br />
14 ~xbS 'ii'xeS IS .txc4! with compensation)<br />
12 ... 'ii'xf6 13 0-0-0 a6 =+<br />
Ubilava-Shirov, Daugavpils 1989.<br />
9 ... hxg510 fxg7 ':g8 (D)<br />
w<br />
11 h4!<br />
It is my opinion that Black experiences<br />
the most difficulties after this<br />
dynamic move, but many strong players<br />
prefer the calmer 11 g3 .tb7<br />
(ll...g4!? 12 ~h4 .tb7 13 .tg2 ':xg7<br />
is seriously worth considering) 12<br />
.tg2 with the possibilities:<br />
a) 12 ... cS!? 13 0-0 (13 dxcS "iiixdl+<br />
14 'ittxdl g4 IS ~el .txg2 16 ~xg2<br />
bxa4 17 ':xa4 ~c6 18 ~e3 .l:txg7 19<br />
~xc4 .txcS 20 ~e4 .td4 was roughly<br />
equal in Kantsler-Oll, Uzhgorod 1987)<br />
13 ... g4 14 ~h4 .txg2 IS ~xg2 cxd4<br />
16 ~xbS ~c6 17 'ii'xg4 a6 18 'ii'e4!?<br />
.!:tc8 19 .l:tfdl!? (19 "ikh7 ~d7!, with the<br />
idea that 20 lHdl is met by 20 ... 'iVf6,<br />
looks good for Black), Yusupov-Van<br />
Wely, Groningen 1994, and now Black<br />
should play 19 ... axbS 20 axbS ~e7 21<br />
.!:txd4 "iiib6. White can then try several<br />
ideas. 22 .!:ta8, 22 .!:txc4 and 22 ~e3<br />
are all candidate moves but it is far<br />
from clear that White's attack prevails,<br />
and at best it looks very unclear.<br />
b) 12 ... ~d7 is safer. After 13 0-0,<br />
Black has these options:<br />
bl) 13. .. a6 and then:<br />
bll) 14 ~eS!? 'iVc7 (14... ~xeS IS<br />
dxeS .txc3 16 bxc3 'iVxdl 17 ':fxdl<br />
±) IS axbS cxbS (Kupreichik suggests<br />
IS ... axbS!? as an interesting alternative;<br />
then after 16 ':xa8+ .txa8, 17<br />
~xbS?! cxbS 18 .txa8 ~xeS 19 dxeS<br />
~e7! 20 'ii'f3 'iVxeS gives Black a<br />
good game, but White might try 17<br />
~e4!? or 17 'ii'hS!?) 16 .txb7 'ii'xb7<br />
17 ~xd7 'ir'xd7 18 'ir'f3 ~e7 19 dS<br />
.txc3 20 dxe6 fxe6 21 'ii'xc3 'ii'd3<br />
with approximately equal chances,<br />
Gabriel-Kupreichik, Bad Worishofen<br />
1997.<br />
b12) 14 axbS axbS IS ':xa8 .txa8<br />
16 ~eS ~xeS 17 dxeS .txc3 (not<br />
17 ....!:txg7? 18 ~e4 'iVxd119 ':xdl ±<br />
Khuzman-Oll, Uzhgorod 1987) 18<br />
bxc3 'ii'xdl 19 .!:txdl .tb7 20 ':d6<br />
.!:txg7 21 .txc6+ .txc6 22 ':xc6 with<br />
much the better endgame for White,<br />
Peshina-Baburin, Budapest 1990.<br />
b2) 13 ...l'hg7?! 14 axbS .txc3 IS<br />
bxc6.txc6 16 bxc3 favoured White in<br />
Dydyshko-Ribic, Berlin 1995, which<br />
explains why Black should exchange<br />
on c3 before capturing the g7-pawn.<br />
b3) 13 ....txc3!? 14 bxc3 ':xg7 IS<br />
"ikbl a6 16 ~d2 'ii'c7 17 axbS cxbS 18<br />
.txb7 'ii'xb7 19 ~xc4 'ii'c6 with an