Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
7 a4 143<br />
w<br />
After the forced 8 ... h6 White has two<br />
options:<br />
a) 9 i.h4 gS 10 exf6 gxh4 and<br />
now:<br />
a1) 11 i.e2 cS!? 12 dxcS ltJd7 13<br />
c6 i.xc6 14 ltJd4 i.xg2 IS .:tg1<br />
(Dokhoian-Kuijf, Wijk aan Zee 1989)<br />
lS ... h3!? 16ltJxe6 'iWxf6 17ltJc7+ (17<br />
ltJd5 i.b4+) 17 .. .'~d8 18ltJ7d5! 'iWeS!?<br />
(18 ... 'iWd619 'iWd4) 19 f4 'iWd6 20 i.f3!<br />
'iWe6+ 21 ~d2 b4 22ltJbS is unclear<br />
Dokhoian.<br />
a2) 11 axbS cxbS 12ltJxbS i.b4+<br />
l3lZJc3, Ki.Georgiev-Nogueiras, Sarajevo<br />
1985, and now after the accurate<br />
13 ... 0-0! 14 i.xc4 'iWxf6, intending<br />
... .:td8, Black has an edge - Nogueiras.<br />
a3) 11 ltJeS ltJd7! (11... 'iW xf6 is<br />
Line C2 of Chapter 10) 12 'iWhS 'iWxf6<br />
13 ltJxd7 (13 axbS ltJxeS 14 dxeS<br />
'iWgS IS 'iWxgS hxgS 16 i.xc4 i.g7 =+=<br />
Kramnik) 13 ... ~xd7 14 axbS cxbS IS<br />
'iWxbS+ i.c6 16 'iWxc4 i.d6 was<br />
slightly better for Black in Van Wely<br />
Kramnik, Manila OL 1992.<br />
b) 9 i.d2!? ltJdS 10 ltJe4 a6 11 b3<br />
cxb3 12 'iWxb3 ltJd7 13 i.d3 i.e7 14<br />
0-00-0 IS i.b1 (this is more accurate<br />
than IS .:tfe1 'iWb6 16 i.b1 l:.fc8 17<br />
'ikc2 cS!, as in Guliev-Savchenko,<br />
Nikolaev Z 1993; now Black does not<br />
get his rook to c8) IS ... l:.e8 16 'iWc2<br />
ltJf8 17 ltJcs (17 .:tel!?) 17 ... i.xcs 18<br />
dxcS. I would be surprised if White<br />
had more than just reasonable practical<br />
chances for the pawn, but practice<br />
has shown that it is not that easy for<br />
Black to defend:<br />
bl) 18 ... fS (this looks a little too<br />
desperate) 19 exf6 'iWxf6 20 i.a2 .:tad8<br />
21 .:tfe1 eS 22 i.aS! .:td7 23ltJd2 (itis<br />
clear that as long as Black's bishop<br />
does not participate White has excellent<br />
compensation) 23 ... ~h8 (23 ... 'iWg6<br />
is more prudent) 24 i.b1 ltJf4 2S .:ta3<br />
'iWg6 26 'iWxg6ltJ4xg6 27lZJe4 ~ Maksimenko-Pinter,<br />
Bnmsh"j 1995.<br />
b2) 18 ... aS!? 19 axbS cxbS 20 c6<br />
i.c8 21 ..txaS!? .:txaS 22 c7 l:.xa1 23<br />
cxd8'iW .:txd8 24 'iWb2 l:.a8 2S l:.e1 b4<br />
26 ..te4 i.b7 27 h3 l:.ab8 112-112 Pogorelov-Korneev,<br />
Benasque 1996.<br />
8 ... cxb5 9 ltJxb5<br />
If White was not ready to play eS on<br />
the previous move, it appears less logical<br />
to do it here. Nevertheless it is<br />
seen once in a while; e.g., 9 eS h6 10<br />
i.d2ltJe4 11ltJxbS ltJxd2! and then:<br />
a) 12 ltJxd2 ltJc6 13 i.xc4 a6 14<br />
ltJd6+ i.xd6 IS exd6 'iWxd6 =F Bouaziz-Zhu<br />
Chen, Cannes 1997.<br />
b) 12 'iWxd2 i.xf3! 13 gxf3ltJc614<br />
.:tdl 'iWb6 IS i.xc4 i.b4 16 ltJc3<br />
O-O-O! with a good position for Black,<br />
Scherbakov-Novikov, Blagoveshchensk<br />
1988.