Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

bernard.paul.guinto
from bernard.paul.guinto More from this publisher
21.10.2019 Views

122 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV 130-0-0! Strangely enough, the safest place for White's king is actually on the queenside. Others: a) 13 a3?! is an inferior version of Stefansson's idea (12 a3!?) above: 13 ... i.xc3 14 bxc3liJc6 IS dxcS i.b7 (lS ... 'iie4+!?) 16 i.e2liJxeS 17 'ii'd4 'ii'f6 180-0-0 'ii'xh8 19 i.xc4?! bxc4 20 l:1he1 liJf7 + Buturin-Mikhalchishin, USSR 1977. b) 13 dxcS liJd7 and now White's best is probably 140-0-0 liJxeS transposing to the note to White's 14th move, while there are also two inferior options: b1) 14 i.e2?! liJxeS IS 0-0 (IS 0-0-0 is better, transposing to note 'a' to White's 14th move) IS ... i.b7 16 a3 i.xc3 (16 ... i.xcS also seems to give Black a promising attacking position, but the text-move is the simplest) 17 bxc3, S.Gillam-Botterill, England 1979, and now 17 ... liJf4 18 %:tfe1 'ii'gS 19 i.hS+ ~f8 20 'ii'd6+? ~g8 wins for Black (Botterill). b2) 14 g3 'ii'hS IS i.g2 i.b7 160-0 O-O-O! and then: b21) 17 'ii'e2 'iixe2 18liJxe2 %:txh8 19 liJd4 liJxeS 20 liJxe6 (20 liJxbS! i.xcs 21 l:1ae1 a6 22 %:txeS axbS 23 %:txe6 reaches a rather level endgame) 20 ... liJd3 favours Black, Timman-Henley, Surakarta/Denpasaar 1983. b22) 17 'ii'c2 %:txh8 (17 ... i.xc3 18 bxc3 %:txh8 19 a4 b4 20 cxb4liJxeS 21 'ii'e4! also favours White) 18 liJxb5 i.xcS 19 'ii'xc4 'ifi>b8, Finegold-Waddingham, Oakham 1986, and now White should play 20 liJd6 i.xd6 21 exd6 with the better game; for example, 21...%:tc8 22 'ii'e4liJcS 23 'iid4 eS 24 'ii'd 1 'ii'f7 2S 'ii'd2. Returning to the position after 13 0-0-0 (D): B 13 ... liJc6 This is a difficult choice, as there is a serious alternative, viz. 13 ... cxd4, although this might appear rather shaky after 14 'ii'xd4: a) Then after 14 ... 'iigS+ IS f4! liJxf4 16liJe4! liJe2+ 17 ~b1 liJxd4 18liJxgS, Shashin-Monin, Leningrad 1980, 18 ... hxgS 191hd4liJc620l:1e4!, followed by 21 h4, White has much the better game. b) However, Black can try playing 14 ... 'ii'xd4!? IS l:1xd4liJxc3 16 bxc3 i.xc3, when the attempt to hang on to the e-pawn with 17 l:1e4 i.b7 18 %:te3 i.d4 19 l:1e2 liJc6 gives Black a very active position well worth the material sacrificed. Hence White should play 17 %:tdl!, when unfortunately there does not seem to be time to grab the

ALATORTSEV'S 9."tiJd5?! 123 e-pawn: 17 ... .txe5 (Black can try 17 ... .tb7 but the compensation after 18 .te2liJd7 19 .th5+ Wd8 20 f4 rJi;c7 21liJn .txg2 22 l:thgl .td5 is hardly sufficient) 18 .te2! .tb7 (18 ... .txh8 19 .tf3liJa6 20 .txa8liJb4 21 rJi;bl is not impressive) 19 .th5+ rJi;e7 20 liJg6+ rJi;f6 21liJxe5 Wxe5 22 ':'hel+ rJi;f6 23 ':'d6 .td5 24 .tg4 and White wins. 14liJg6!? (D) This brings out the knight immediately before it gets in danger of being trapped in the corner, and appears the most dangerous for Black. White has another promising option, viz. 14 dxc5 liJxe5 and now: a) 15 .te2 .tb7 16 g3 'iVf6 17 f4 liJxc3 18 .th5+! ~f8 19 fxe5liJxa2+ 20 ~bl 'iVf5+ 21 rJi;xa2 .txd2 22 ':'hfl, as analysed by Botterill, is probably also slightly better for White, for example after 22 ... 'iVxfl 23 ':'xfl + ~g8 24 liJg6 .te4 25 liJe7+ rJi;h8 26 c6. b) 15 f4! 'iVxf4 (it is possible to take on c3 flrst, but I prefer to keep the bishop) 16 'ti'xf4liJxf4 and now: bl) 17 g3liJfd3+ 18 .txd3liJxd3+ 19 ~c2 (19 ':'xd3!? cxd3 20 liJxb5 l:tb8 21 liJd6+ ~f8 22 liJg6+ has been suggested as an improvement, and here I disagree with Peter Wells, who believes that Black is flne; after 22.A.)g7 23 liJf4 .lixc5 24 liJxc8 .lle3+ 25 'it>bl .txf4 26liJxa7, I think White keeps an advantage, because the knight is not in danger of being trapped, and if Black is not careful White may even be able to round up the d-pawn) 19 ... .lixc3 20 ~xc3 .tb7 21 ':'hfl b4+ 22 'it>xc4 liJxb2+ 23 'it>xb4 liJxdl 24 l:txdl l:tb8 25 'it>c3 ':'c8 and Black has enough counterplay to draw, Razuvaev-Inkiov, Moscow 1986. b2) 17liJxb5 'it>e7! (17 ... ':'b8? 18 liJd6+ rJi;e7 19 liJxc4 wins the c4- pawn without compensation, Ribli­ Nogueiras, Montpellier Ct 1985) 18 c6 and now Polugaevsky's 18 ... ':'b8!? mixes things up considerably. 19liJxa7 i.a6 almost traps the knight, while if it retreats, Black will play ... liJfd3+. B 14 ... .txc3 14 ... liJxc3 15liJxh4liJxa2+ 16 ~bl i.xd2 17 l:txd2 liJab4 18 liJf3 is good for White according to Polugaevsky. 15 bxc3 Now there are the following possibilities for Black: a) 15 ... 'iVg4 16 'iVxh6 and White wins. b) 15 ... 'ti'h516liJf4liJxf417'iVxf4 cxd4 18 cxd4 liJb4 19 'iWd2 a5, with

122 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />

130-0-0!<br />

Strangely enough, the safest place<br />

for White's king is actually on the<br />

queenside. Others:<br />

a) 13 a3?! is an inferior version of<br />

Stefansson's idea (12 a3!?) above:<br />

13 ... i.xc3 14 bxc3liJc6 IS dxcS i.b7<br />

(lS ... 'iie4+!?) 16 i.e2liJxeS 17 'ii'd4<br />

'ii'f6 180-0-0 'ii'xh8 19 i.xc4?! bxc4<br />

20 l:1he1 liJf7 + Buturin-Mikhalchishin,<br />

USSR 1977.<br />

b) 13 dxcS liJd7 and now White's<br />

best is probably 140-0-0 liJxeS transposing<br />

to the note to White's 14th<br />

move, while there are also two inferior<br />

options:<br />

b1) 14 i.e2?! liJxeS IS 0-0 (IS<br />

0-0-0 is better, transposing to note 'a'<br />

to White's 14th move) IS ... i.b7 16 a3<br />

i.xc3 (16 ... i.xcS also seems to give<br />

Black a promising attacking position,<br />

but the text-move is the simplest) 17<br />

bxc3, S.Gillam-Botterill, England 1979,<br />

and now 17 ... liJf4 18 %:tfe1 'ii'gS 19<br />

i.hS+ ~f8 20 'ii'd6+? ~g8 wins for<br />

Black (Botterill).<br />

b2) 14 g3 'ii'hS IS i.g2 i.b7 160-0<br />

O-O-O! and then:<br />

b21) 17 'ii'e2 'iixe2 18liJxe2 %:txh8<br />

19 liJd4 liJxeS 20 liJxe6 (20 liJxbS!<br />

i.xcs 21 l:1ae1 a6 22 %:txeS axbS 23<br />

%:txe6 reaches a rather level endgame)<br />

20 ... liJd3 favours Black, Timman-Henley,<br />

Surakarta/Denpasaar 1983.<br />

b22) 17 'ii'c2 %:txh8 (17 ... i.xc3 18<br />

bxc3 %:txh8 19 a4 b4 20 cxb4liJxeS 21<br />

'ii'e4! also favours White) 18 liJxb5<br />

i.xcS 19 'ii'xc4 'ifi>b8, Finegold-Waddingham,<br />

Oakham 1986, and now<br />

White should play 20 liJd6 i.xd6 21<br />

exd6 with the better game; for example,<br />

21...%:tc8 22 'ii'e4liJcS 23 'iid4 eS<br />

24 'ii'd 1 'ii'f7 2S 'ii'd2.<br />

Returning to the position after 13<br />

0-0-0 (D):<br />

B<br />

13 ... liJc6<br />

This is a difficult choice, as there is<br />

a serious alternative, viz. 13 ... cxd4, although<br />

this might appear rather shaky<br />

after 14 'ii'xd4:<br />

a) <strong>The</strong>n after 14 ... 'iigS+ IS f4!<br />

liJxf4 16liJe4! liJe2+ 17 ~b1 liJxd4<br />

18liJxgS, Shashin-Monin, Leningrad<br />

1980, 18 ... hxgS 191hd4liJc620l:1e4!,<br />

followed by 21 h4, White has much<br />

the better game.<br />

b) However, Black can try playing<br />

14 ... 'ii'xd4!? IS l:1xd4liJxc3 16 bxc3<br />

i.xc3, when the attempt to hang on to<br />

the e-pawn with 17 l:1e4 i.b7 18 %:te3<br />

i.d4 19 l:1e2 liJc6 gives Black a very<br />

active position well worth the material<br />

sacrificed. Hence White should play<br />

17 %:tdl!, when unfortunately there<br />

does not seem to be time to grab the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!