Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
122 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV 130-0-0! Strangely enough, the safest place for White's king is actually on the queenside. Others: a) 13 a3?! is an inferior version of Stefansson's idea (12 a3!?) above: 13 ... i.xc3 14 bxc3liJc6 IS dxcS i.b7 (lS ... 'iie4+!?) 16 i.e2liJxeS 17 'ii'd4 'ii'f6 180-0-0 'ii'xh8 19 i.xc4?! bxc4 20 l:1he1 liJf7 + Buturin-Mikhalchishin, USSR 1977. b) 13 dxcS liJd7 and now White's best is probably 140-0-0 liJxeS transposing to the note to White's 14th move, while there are also two inferior options: b1) 14 i.e2?! liJxeS IS 0-0 (IS 0-0-0 is better, transposing to note 'a' to White's 14th move) IS ... i.b7 16 a3 i.xc3 (16 ... i.xcS also seems to give Black a promising attacking position, but the text-move is the simplest) 17 bxc3, S.Gillam-Botterill, England 1979, and now 17 ... liJf4 18 %:tfe1 'ii'gS 19 i.hS+ ~f8 20 'ii'd6+? ~g8 wins for Black (Botterill). b2) 14 g3 'ii'hS IS i.g2 i.b7 160-0 O-O-O! and then: b21) 17 'ii'e2 'iixe2 18liJxe2 %:txh8 19 liJd4 liJxeS 20 liJxe6 (20 liJxbS! i.xcs 21 l:1ae1 a6 22 %:txeS axbS 23 %:txe6 reaches a rather level endgame) 20 ... liJd3 favours Black, Timman-Henley, Surakarta/Denpasaar 1983. b22) 17 'ii'c2 %:txh8 (17 ... i.xc3 18 bxc3 %:txh8 19 a4 b4 20 cxb4liJxeS 21 'ii'e4! also favours White) 18 liJxb5 i.xcS 19 'ii'xc4 'ifi>b8, Finegold-Waddingham, Oakham 1986, and now White should play 20 liJd6 i.xd6 21 exd6 with the better game; for example, 21...%:tc8 22 'ii'e4liJcS 23 'iid4 eS 24 'ii'd 1 'ii'f7 2S 'ii'd2. Returning to the position after 13 0-0-0 (D): B 13 ... liJc6 This is a difficult choice, as there is a serious alternative, viz. 13 ... cxd4, although this might appear rather shaky after 14 'ii'xd4: a) Then after 14 ... 'iigS+ IS f4! liJxf4 16liJe4! liJe2+ 17 ~b1 liJxd4 18liJxgS, Shashin-Monin, Leningrad 1980, 18 ... hxgS 191hd4liJc620l:1e4!, followed by 21 h4, White has much the better game. b) However, Black can try playing 14 ... 'ii'xd4!? IS l:1xd4liJxc3 16 bxc3 i.xc3, when the attempt to hang on to the e-pawn with 17 l:1e4 i.b7 18 %:te3 i.d4 19 l:1e2 liJc6 gives Black a very active position well worth the material sacrificed. Hence White should play 17 %:tdl!, when unfortunately there does not seem to be time to grab the
ALATORTSEV'S 9."tiJd5?! 123 e-pawn: 17 ... .txe5 (Black can try 17 ... .tb7 but the compensation after 18 .te2liJd7 19 .th5+ Wd8 20 f4 rJi;c7 21liJn .txg2 22 l:thgl .td5 is hardly sufficient) 18 .te2! .tb7 (18 ... .txh8 19 .tf3liJa6 20 .txa8liJb4 21 rJi;bl is not impressive) 19 .th5+ rJi;e7 20 liJg6+ rJi;f6 21liJxe5 Wxe5 22 ':'hel+ rJi;f6 23 ':'d6 .td5 24 .tg4 and White wins. 14liJg6!? (D) This brings out the knight immediately before it gets in danger of being trapped in the corner, and appears the most dangerous for Black. White has another promising option, viz. 14 dxc5 liJxe5 and now: a) 15 .te2 .tb7 16 g3 'iVf6 17 f4 liJxc3 18 .th5+! ~f8 19 fxe5liJxa2+ 20 ~bl 'iVf5+ 21 rJi;xa2 .txd2 22 ':'hfl, as analysed by Botterill, is probably also slightly better for White, for example after 22 ... 'iVxfl 23 ':'xfl + ~g8 24 liJg6 .te4 25 liJe7+ rJi;h8 26 c6. b) 15 f4! 'iVxf4 (it is possible to take on c3 flrst, but I prefer to keep the bishop) 16 'ti'xf4liJxf4 and now: bl) 17 g3liJfd3+ 18 .txd3liJxd3+ 19 ~c2 (19 ':'xd3!? cxd3 20 liJxb5 l:tb8 21 liJd6+ ~f8 22 liJg6+ has been suggested as an improvement, and here I disagree with Peter Wells, who believes that Black is flne; after 22.A.)g7 23 liJf4 .lixc5 24 liJxc8 .lle3+ 25 'it>bl .txf4 26liJxa7, I think White keeps an advantage, because the knight is not in danger of being trapped, and if Black is not careful White may even be able to round up the d-pawn) 19 ... .lixc3 20 ~xc3 .tb7 21 ':'hfl b4+ 22 'it>xc4 liJxb2+ 23 'it>xb4 liJxdl 24 l:txdl l:tb8 25 'it>c3 ':'c8 and Black has enough counterplay to draw, Razuvaev-Inkiov, Moscow 1986. b2) 17liJxb5 'it>e7! (17 ... ':'b8? 18 liJd6+ rJi;e7 19 liJxc4 wins the c4- pawn without compensation, Ribli Nogueiras, Montpellier Ct 1985) 18 c6 and now Polugaevsky's 18 ... ':'b8!? mixes things up considerably. 19liJxa7 i.a6 almost traps the knight, while if it retreats, Black will play ... liJfd3+. B 14 ... .txc3 14 ... liJxc3 15liJxh4liJxa2+ 16 ~bl i.xd2 17 l:txd2 liJab4 18 liJf3 is good for White according to Polugaevsky. 15 bxc3 Now there are the following possibilities for Black: a) 15 ... 'iVg4 16 'iVxh6 and White wins. b) 15 ... 'ti'h516liJf4liJxf417'iVxf4 cxd4 18 cxd4 liJb4 19 'iWd2 a5, with
- Page 73 and 74: BLACK'S 13TH MOVE ALTERNATNES 71 21
- Page 75 and 76: BLACK'S 13TH MOVE ALTERNATNES 73 .t
- Page 77 and 78: BUCK'S 13TH MOVE ALTERNATIVES 75 d)
- Page 79 and 80: BLACK'S 13TH MOVE ALTERNATNES 77 19
- Page 81 and 82: IDEAS WITH .. .'ila5 79 after 12 ..
- Page 83 and 84: IDEAS WITH ... "iia5 81 17 ~xf1 cS
- Page 85 and 86: IDEAS WITH .. :iia5 83 'iti>xb7 24
- Page 87 and 88: IDEAS WITH .. :ila5 85 It is very p
- Page 89 and 90: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 91 and 92: MOVE-ORDERS AND VAR,OUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 93 and 94: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 95 and 96: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 97 and 98: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 99 and 100: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 101 and 102: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 103 and 104: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 105 and 106: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 107 and 108: MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS
- Page 109 and 110: lO ... j.e7 107 his own best defend
- Page 111 and 112: JO ... .i.e7 109 A) 12 .txf6 'iVxf6
- Page 113 and 114: JO ... iJ.e7 111 a) 150-00-0-016 a4
- Page 115 and 116: lO ... J..e7 113 19 .. Jhd4 20 axb5
- Page 117 and 118: 1O ... i.e7 115 13 ... .te7 (D) 13
- Page 119 and 120: ALATORTSEV'S 9 . ..lijd5?! 117 Blac
- Page 121 and 122: ALATORTSEV'S 9.JiJd5?! 119 13 ... .
- Page 123: ALATORTSEV'S 9 ... 0,d5?! 121 'ti'c
- Page 127 and 128: ALATORTSEV'S 9 . ..tiJd5?! 125 is a
- Page 129 and 130: 10 White Gambits: 9 exf6!? 1 d4 d5
- Page 131 and 132: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 129 B Bello
- Page 133 and 134: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 131 positio
- Page 135 and 136: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 133 White h
- Page 137 and 138: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 135 12 .. :
- Page 139 and 140: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 137 tZ:lc6
- Page 141 and 142: WHITE GAMBITS: 9 exf6!? 139 Such a
- Page 143 and 144: 11 7 a4 1 d4 d5 2 c4 c6 3 lLlf3 lLl
- Page 145 and 146: 7 a4 143 w After the forced 8 ... h
- Page 147 and 148: 7 a4 145 b) 10 exf6 gxh4 11 ~eS cS!
- Page 149 and 150: 7 a4 147 There seems to be no way t
- Page 151 and 152: 7 a4 149 on such a peculiar rook mo
- Page 153 and 154: 12 Early Deviations (6 e3 and 6 a4)
- Page 155 and 156: EARLY DEVIATIONS (6 e3 AND 6 a4) 15
- Page 157 and 158: EARLY DEVIATIONS (6 e3 AND 6 a4) 15
- Page 159 and 160: 14 The Anti-Moscow Variation: 6 Jth
- Page 161 and 162: THE ANTI-MoSCOW VARIATION: 6 .i.h4!
- Page 163 and 164: THE ANTI-MOSCOW VARIATION: 6 Ji.h4!
- Page 165 and 166: THE ANTI-MOSCOW VARIATION: 6 iLh4!?
- Page 167 and 168: THE ANTI-MoSCOW VARIATION: 6 ~h4!?
- Page 169 and 170: THE ANTI-MoSCOW VARIATION: 6 i&.h4!
- Page 171 and 172: THE ANTI-MoSCOW VARIATION: 6 ~h4!?
- Page 173 and 174: THE ANTI-MoSCOW VARIATION: 6 iLh4!?
122 THE BOTVINNIK SEMI-SlAV<br />
130-0-0!<br />
Strangely enough, the safest place<br />
for White's king is actually on the<br />
queenside. Others:<br />
a) 13 a3?! is an inferior version of<br />
Stefansson's idea (12 a3!?) above:<br />
13 ... i.xc3 14 bxc3liJc6 IS dxcS i.b7<br />
(lS ... 'iie4+!?) 16 i.e2liJxeS 17 'ii'd4<br />
'ii'f6 180-0-0 'ii'xh8 19 i.xc4?! bxc4<br />
20 l:1he1 liJf7 + Buturin-Mikhalchishin,<br />
USSR 1977.<br />
b) 13 dxcS liJd7 and now White's<br />
best is probably 140-0-0 liJxeS transposing<br />
to the note to White's 14th<br />
move, while there are also two inferior<br />
options:<br />
b1) 14 i.e2?! liJxeS IS 0-0 (IS<br />
0-0-0 is better, transposing to note 'a'<br />
to White's 14th move) IS ... i.b7 16 a3<br />
i.xc3 (16 ... i.xcS also seems to give<br />
Black a promising attacking position,<br />
but the text-move is the simplest) 17<br />
bxc3, S.Gillam-Botterill, England 1979,<br />
and now 17 ... liJf4 18 %:tfe1 'ii'gS 19<br />
i.hS+ ~f8 20 'ii'd6+? ~g8 wins for<br />
Black (Botterill).<br />
b2) 14 g3 'ii'hS IS i.g2 i.b7 160-0<br />
O-O-O! and then:<br />
b21) 17 'ii'e2 'iixe2 18liJxe2 %:txh8<br />
19 liJd4 liJxeS 20 liJxe6 (20 liJxbS!<br />
i.xcs 21 l:1ae1 a6 22 %:txeS axbS 23<br />
%:txe6 reaches a rather level endgame)<br />
20 ... liJd3 favours Black, Timman-Henley,<br />
Surakarta/Denpasaar 1983.<br />
b22) 17 'ii'c2 %:txh8 (17 ... i.xc3 18<br />
bxc3 %:txh8 19 a4 b4 20 cxb4liJxeS 21<br />
'ii'e4! also favours White) 18 liJxb5<br />
i.xcS 19 'ii'xc4 'ifi>b8, Finegold-Waddingham,<br />
Oakham 1986, and now<br />
White should play 20 liJd6 i.xd6 21<br />
exd6 with the better game; for example,<br />
21...%:tc8 22 'ii'e4liJcS 23 'iid4 eS<br />
24 'ii'd 1 'ii'f7 2S 'ii'd2.<br />
Returning to the position after 13<br />
0-0-0 (D):<br />
B<br />
13 ... liJc6<br />
This is a difficult choice, as there is<br />
a serious alternative, viz. 13 ... cxd4, although<br />
this might appear rather shaky<br />
after 14 'ii'xd4:<br />
a) <strong>The</strong>n after 14 ... 'iigS+ IS f4!<br />
liJxf4 16liJe4! liJe2+ 17 ~b1 liJxd4<br />
18liJxgS, Shashin-Monin, Leningrad<br />
1980, 18 ... hxgS 191hd4liJc620l:1e4!,<br />
followed by 21 h4, White has much<br />
the better game.<br />
b) However, Black can try playing<br />
14 ... 'ii'xd4!? IS l:1xd4liJxc3 16 bxc3<br />
i.xc3, when the attempt to hang on to<br />
the e-pawn with 17 l:1e4 i.b7 18 %:te3<br />
i.d4 19 l:1e2 liJc6 gives Black a very<br />
active position well worth the material<br />
sacrificed. Hence White should play<br />
17 %:tdl!, when unfortunately there<br />
does not seem to be time to grab the