Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
ALATORTSEV'S 9 ... 0,d5?! 121<br />
'ti'c2 (13 tOg6 'ti'e4+ 14 .te2 'i;;f7 is<br />
less clear) 13 ... .txh8 14 'ti'h7 winning.<br />
w<br />
Now:<br />
Bl: 12 'ti'd2!? 121<br />
B2: 12.l:tc1! 124<br />
<strong>The</strong> latter is my clear preference.<br />
<strong>The</strong> old main line was 12 'ifd2 but it<br />
makes more sense to keep the queen<br />
on the d1-h5 diagonal, as it is often<br />
very useful to have the possibility of<br />
.th5( +). That is, of course, only after<br />
having ascertained that 12 ... 'ife4+ is<br />
nothing but a blow in the air. However,<br />
the theoretical status of 12 'ti'd2 also<br />
looks very promising for White, although<br />
I have a strange feeling that<br />
Black is able to improve somewhere.<br />
Hence my preference for the move 12<br />
.l:tc1!.<br />
I should also mention that 12 a3!? is<br />
an interesting idea. It has only been<br />
tried in one game (that I know of), but<br />
it remains a mystery to me why it has<br />
not been repeated. Sadler goes as far<br />
as describing 12 a3 as "almost a forced<br />
win"; I will not go that far, but it does<br />
look very promising:<br />
a) 12 ... .txc3+ 13 bxc3 tOxc3<br />
(13 ... c5!?) 14 'ti'd2 tOd5 15 .te2 tOd7<br />
(15 ... c5 16 dxc5 tOc6 17 tOg6 also favours<br />
White) 16 tOg6 'ti'g5 (16 .. :i!i'e4<br />
17 'ifxh6 'i;;d8 18 'ti'h4+ +-) 17 'it'xg5<br />
hxg5 18 h4 should win for White.<br />
b) 12 ... .ta5 is perhaps best, but<br />
then Black is deprived of some of his<br />
sharpest options in the main line.<br />
c) 12 ... tOxc3 13 'it'f3! 'it'xd4 (if<br />
13 ... .ta5 14 bxc3 'it'xd4 then 15 'it'f7+<br />
'i;;d8 16 J::td1 and White wins - Tangborn;<br />
or 13 ... tOe4+ 14 axb4 tOg5 15<br />
'it'f8+ 'i;;xf8 16 tOg6+ 'i;;g7 17 tOxh4<br />
tOa6 18 .te2 tOxb4 19 0-0 tOc2 20<br />
l:tad1 a5 21 f4! ±) 14 'it'h5+ 'i;;d8 15<br />
axb4 'ti'e4+ (or 15 ... tOd5 16 .te2 tOd7<br />
17 tOf7+ 'i;;c7 18 0-0 tOf4 19 'it'f3<br />
tOxe2+ 20 'it'xe2 'iff4 21 tOd6 tOxe5<br />
22 tOxc8 'it>xc8 23 J::tfe 1 +-) 16 .te2<br />
tOxe217 'it'xe2 'ti'h718 't!Vd2+'it>c719<br />
'it'd6+ 'i;;b7 20 J::td1 't!Vxh8 21 't!Ve7+ ±<br />
Stefansson-Inkiov, Gausdal1990.<br />
91)<br />
121iVd2!? c5<br />
This is clearly the most critical.<br />
Other moves can be dealt with briefly:<br />
a) 12 ... tOd7 13 0-0-0 .tb7 is possible<br />
but Harding does not think Black's<br />
compensation is adequate after 14 g3<br />
.txc3 (14 ... 'it'g4 15 't!Vxh6 is good for<br />
White) 15 gxh4.txd2+ 16J::txd2c517<br />
.l:tg1!'<br />
b) 12 .. :iVg4 is Fritz's suggestion<br />
after a short 'think', but 13 .te2 't!Vxg2<br />
140-0-0 looks dangerous.