21.10.2019 Views

Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

JO ... iJ.e7 111<br />

a) 150-00-0-016 a4 l:.xd4 17 'iie2<br />

b4 18 lbe4 'it'e5 19 l:.adl l:.hd8 20<br />

l:.xd4 'iWxd4 21 lbg5 l:.d7 + Tunik­<br />

Dreev, USSR 1985.<br />

b) 15 a4 and now:<br />

bl) 15 ... b4 16 lbe4 'it'e7 17 'it'e2<br />

O-O-O!? (17 ... f5 18 lbc5 lbxc5 19 dxc5<br />

'iWxc5 20 'iWxe6+ 'fie7 21 'fixe7+ rt;xe7<br />

22 0-0 ± Ross-Schiller, Pan American<br />

1986) 18 'ir'xc4 e5 19 dxe5 'iWxe5 20<br />

0-0 l:ld4 21 'it'c2 c5 22 l:.fel 'it>b8 23<br />

h4 'ir'd5 24 i.f3 'fif5 25 l:.e3 l:lhd8 is<br />

unclear, Ribli-Fahnenschmidt, Bundesliga<br />

1985/6.<br />

b2) 15 ... 0-0-0 16 axb5 cxb5 (Polugaevsky<br />

also considered 16 ... l:.xd4,<br />

when 17 'iWf3 'it'xf3 18 i.xf3 cxb5 19<br />

i.xb7+ ~xb7 20 lbxb5 %:te4+ 21 'it>f1<br />

%:td8 is equal, but White might try 17<br />

bxa6!? l:.xdl+ 18lbxdl i.a8 190-0<br />

followed by lbe3; this is of course<br />

risky but perhaps promising as it is not<br />

so easy for Black to wake up the sleeping<br />

bishop on a8) 17 i.xb7+ ~xb7 18<br />

lbxb5 with a further divide:<br />

b21) 18 ... 'fif5?! 19 'fia4! 'fie4+ 20<br />

rt;d2 'ir'c6 21 b3 leads to a distinct<br />

advantage for White, Polugaevsky­<br />

Flear, London 1986.<br />

b22) 18 ... lbb4 190-0 lbc6 20 'fie2<br />

± Babula-Vavra, Czech Extraleague<br />

1998/9.<br />

b23) 18 ... e5 19 d5 and then:<br />

b231) 19 ... lbc5 has the point that<br />

a4 is not accessible to White's queen<br />

but then another route to near Black's<br />

king is available: 20 l:.xa7+ ~b6 21<br />

'ir'd2! lbd3+ 22 ~f1 (22 ~dl? 'it'f3+<br />

23 ~c2 'it'xf2 was rather embarrassing<br />

for White in Kirilov-Nei, Tallinn tt<br />

1986; White inevitably loses a piece<br />

and there is no perpetual afterwards,<br />

so White took the fastest course to end<br />

the game and resigned) 22 ... 'it'xf2+ 23<br />

'iWxf2+ lbxf2 24 ~xf2 'it>xb5 25 %:txf7<br />

and White is better even though it is<br />

not clear that it is enough to win the<br />

game.<br />

b232) 19 ... lbb4 20 l:.xa7+ (20 O-O??<br />

'fih6! and White resigned in view of<br />

21 h4 'fi xh4! in Eingorn-I vanovic, Bor<br />

1986) 20 ... 'it>b6 21 'fia4lbd3+ 22 'it>d2<br />

'fixf2+ 23 ~c3 'fixb2+ 24 ~xc4 l:lc8+<br />

25 'it>xd3 e4+ 26 ~e3 l:.c3+ 27 lbxc3<br />

'fixc3+ 28 'it>xe4 f5+ 29 'it>f4 'it'd2+<br />

Ih-1f2 Ehlvest-Ivanchuk, Minsk 1986. I<br />

can imagine there is a perpetual.<br />

c) 15lbxb5 with a further branch:<br />

cl) 15 ... cxb5!? (playing 15 lbxb5<br />

one does not really expect this to work<br />

but it is not so clear) 16 i.xb7 lbb4 17<br />

0-0 (17 i.xa8lbd3+ 18 ~d2 'it'xd4 is<br />

probably just a draw) 17 ... %:td818 'it'd2<br />

lbd3 19 i.c6+ ~e7 20 i.xb5 %:tdg8,<br />

intending ... 'fih4, is actually very dangerous<br />

for White and led to quick win

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!