Botvinnik Semi-Slav, The (Pedersen)
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
MOVE-ORDERS AND VARIOUS DEVIATIONS 101<br />
was clearly better for White in Shabalov-Zamora,<br />
Philadelphia 1998.<br />
18 i.f4 c3!?<br />
Black attempts to create counterplay<br />
by activating his bishop on the<br />
a6-fl diagonal but the move has the<br />
obvious drawback that it opens lines<br />
for White against Black's own king.<br />
However, the alternative 18 .. J~h5<br />
is not much better: 19 ltd4 c5 (or<br />
19 .. Jbe5?! 20 i.xe5 'it'xe5 21 ltfd1)<br />
20 ltxc4 i.d5 (20 ... i.a6? 21 ltxc5+<br />
i.xc5 22 ltc1 ± Ermolinsky-Machulsky,<br />
USSR 1982) 21 .l:.c2 c4 22 liJd2<br />
c3 23 bxc3 bxc3 24 ltfc1 i.b4 25 liJb1<br />
i.xg2 26 ~xg2 'it'd5+ 27 f3 ±.<br />
19 bxc3 i.a6!<br />
19 ... bxc3 20 liJg5 i.a6 21 liJxf7<br />
i.xfl 22 i.xfl is very good for White.<br />
20 cxb4 i.xb4 21 a3! i.xa3 22<br />
.l:.fel i.d3! 23 liJd6+ i.xd6 24 exd6<br />
~d7 2SlteS<br />
25 .l:.al!? 'it'b6 26 i.e3 c5 27 .l:.ec1<br />
.l:.c8 28 l:.a3 i.b5 29 ltac3 ~xd6 30 h4<br />
is given by Yermolinsky and Shabalov,<br />
and looks more ambitious. I would<br />
definitely prefer White. Black cannot<br />
hold the c5-pawn and creating counterplay<br />
with ... a5 requires some preparation.<br />
Meanwhile White has walked<br />
his h-pawn closer to promotion.<br />
2S ... i.bS 26 .l:.c1 'it'a4 27 .l:.ecS<br />
White has a bind and an edge, Yermolinsky-Kaidanov,<br />
USA Ch 1993.<br />
822)<br />
14 ... cS<br />
It is important to note that if Black<br />
wishes to play the main line after 11<br />
g3, he will reach this position, i.e. after<br />
11 ... i.b7 12 i.g2 'iVb6 13 exf6 0-0-0<br />
140-0 c5. <strong>The</strong> question is now whether<br />
15 dxc5 represents a greater problem<br />
than 15 d5, which transposes to Chapters<br />
2-4.<br />
15 dxcS liJxcs<br />
15 ... i.xc5 16 'it'e2 .l:.dg8 17 i.xb7+<br />
'ii'xb7 18 liJe4 'ii'd5 19 .l:.fd1 i.d4 20<br />
ltxd4 'ii'xd4 21 ltd 1 'ii'e5 22 'ii'f3!<br />
gave White a promising attack in the<br />
game Yuferov-Timoshchenko, USSR<br />
1981.<br />
16 'iVe2 i..xg217 ~xg2 i.h6! (D)<br />
w<br />
18h4<br />
18 i.xh6 .l:.xh6 19 a4 (19 'ii'f3!?)<br />
19 ... b4 20liJe4 liJxe4 21 'ii'xe4 'ii'b7 22<br />
'ii'xb7+ 'iitxb7 23 l:ac1 l:d4 24 .l:.fd1<br />
ltxd1 25 .l:.xd1 'iitc6 leads to an unclear<br />
ending according to Tal. This is<br />
one of those endings where, despite<br />
being a pawn up, White must take<br />
great care owing to Black's queenside<br />
pawns.<br />
18 ... i..xgS 19 hxgS 'ili'c6+ 20 f3<br />
.l:.hS!