20.09.2019 Views

The Political Dynamics of Justice Reform in The U.S.

The Political Dynamics of Justice Reform in The U.S.

The Political Dynamics of Justice Reform in The U.S.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

National and International Developments<br />

Development <strong>of</strong> <strong>The</strong> Concept<br />

<strong>The</strong> development <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence has been argued to <strong>in</strong>volve a cycle <strong>of</strong><br />

national law hav<strong>in</strong>g an impact on <strong>in</strong>ternational law, and <strong>in</strong>ternational law subsequently<br />

impact<strong>in</strong>g national law. This is said to occur <strong>in</strong> three phases: the first phase is<br />

characterized by the domestic development <strong>of</strong> the concept <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence, the<br />

second by the spread <strong>of</strong> these concepts <strong>in</strong>ternationally and their implementation <strong>in</strong><br />

<strong>in</strong>ternational law, and the third by the implementation <strong>in</strong> national law <strong>of</strong> these newly<br />

formulated <strong>in</strong>ternational pr<strong>in</strong>ciples <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence.<br />

A notable example illustrat<strong>in</strong>g this cycle is the United K<strong>in</strong>gdom. <strong>The</strong> first phase occurred<br />

<strong>in</strong> England with the orig<strong>in</strong>al conception <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence <strong>in</strong> the Act <strong>of</strong> Settlement<br />

1701. <strong>The</strong> second phase was evident when England’s concepts regard<strong>in</strong>g judicial<br />

<strong>in</strong>dependence spread <strong>in</strong>ternationally, and were adopted <strong>in</strong>to the domestic law <strong>of</strong> other<br />

countries; for <strong>in</strong>stance, England served as the model for Montesquieu’s separation <strong>of</strong><br />

powers doctr<strong>in</strong>e, and the Found<strong>in</strong>g Fathers <strong>of</strong> the US Constitution used England as<br />

their dom<strong>in</strong>ant model <strong>in</strong> formulat<strong>in</strong>g the Constitution’s Article III, which is the foundation<br />

<strong>of</strong> American judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence. Other common law countries, <strong>in</strong>clud<strong>in</strong>g Canada,<br />

Australia, and India, also adopted the British model <strong>of</strong> judicial <strong>in</strong>dependence.<br />

Page 49 <strong>of</strong> 262

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!