fluid_mechanics

claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa
from claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa More from this publisher
19.09.2019 Views

518 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immersed Bodies SOLUTION (a) For steady flight conditions the lift must be exactly balanced COMMENT This power level is obtainable by a well-conditioned athlete 1as is indicated by the fact that the flight was suc- by the weight, or cessfully completed2. Note that only 80% of the pilot’s power w l 1 2 rU 2 AC L 1i.e., 0.8 0.302 0.242 hp, which corresponds to a drag of Thus, d 8.86 lb2 is needed to force the aircraft through the air. The other 20% is lost because of the power train inefficiency. C L 2w By repeating the calculations for various flight speeds, the rU 2 A results shown in Fig. E9.15b are obtained. Note from Eq. 1 that where A bc 96 ft 7.5 ft 720 ft 2 , w 210 lb, and r for a constant drag coefficient, the power required increases as 2.38 10 3 slugsft 3 for standard air. This gives U 3 —a doubling of the speed to 30 ft/s would require an eightfold increase in power (i.e., 2.42 hp, well beyond the range of 21210 lb2 any human). C L 12.38 10 3 slugsft 3 2115 fts2 2 1720 ft 2 2 1.09 (Ans) 2.5 a reasonable number. The overall lift-to-drag ratio for the aircraft is C LC D 1.090.046 23.7. (b) The product of the power that the pilot supplies and the power train efficiency equals the useful power needed to overcome the drag, d. That is, where Thus, or hp dU d 1 2 rU 2 AC D p dU 1 h 2 rU 2 AC D U rAC DU 3 h 2h p 12.38 103 slugsft 3 21720 ft 2 210.0462115 fts2 3 210.82 p 166 ft # 1 hp lbs a (Ans) 550 ft # b 0.302 hp lbs (1) , hp 2.0 1.5 1.0 0.5 0 0 5 (15, 0.302) 10 F I G U R E E9.15b 15 20 25 30 U, ft/s Inviscid flow analysis can be used to obtain ideal flow past airfoils. 9.4.2 Circulation Since viscous effects are of minor importance in the generation of lift, it should be possible to calculate the lift force on an airfoil by integrating the pressure distribution obtained from the equations governing inviscid flow past the airfoil. That is, the potential flow theory discussed in Chapter 6 should provide a method to determine the lift. Although the details are beyond the scope of this book, the following is found from such calculations 1Ref. 42. The calculation of the inviscid flow past a two-dimensional airfoil gives a flow field as indicated in Fig. 9.36. The predicted flow field past an airfoil with no lift 1i.e., a symmetrical airfoil at zero angle of attack, Fig. 9.36a2 appears to be quite accurate 1except for the absence of thin boundary layer regions2. However, as is indicated in Fig. 9.36b, the calculated flow past the same airfoil at a nonzero angle of attack 1but one small enough so that boundary layer separation would not occur2 is not proper near the trailing edge. In addition, the calculated lift for a nonzero angle of attack is zero—in conflict with the known fact that such airfoils produce lift. In reality, the flow should pass smoothly over the top surface as is indicated in Fig. 9.36c, without the strange behavior indicated near the trailing edge in Fig. 9.36b. As is shown in Fig. 9.36d, the unrealistic flow situation can be corrected by adding an appropriate clockwise swirling flow around the airfoil. The results are twofold: 112 The unrealistic behavior near the trailing edge is eliminated 1i.e.,

9.4 Lift 519 α = 0 = 0 (a) α > 0 = 0 (b) α > 0 > 0 (c) + = "(a) + circulation = (c)" (d) F I G U R E 9.36 Inviscid flow past an airfoil: (a) symmetrical flow past the symmetrical airfoil at a zero angle of attack; (b) same airfoil at a nonzero angle of attack—no lift, flow near trailing edge not realistic; (c) same conditions as for (b) except circulation has been added to the flow—nonzero lift, realistic flow; (d) superposition of flows to produce the final flow past the airfoil. V9.19 Wing tip vortices (Photograph courtesy of NASA.) the flow pattern of Fig. 9.36b is changed to that of Fig. 9.36c2, and 122 the average velocity on the upper surface of the airfoil is increased while that on the lower surface is decreased. From the Bernoulli equation concepts 1i.e., pg V 2 2g z constant2, the average pressure on the upper surface is decreased and that on the lower surface is increased. The net effect is to change the original zero lift condition to that of a lift-producing airfoil. The addition of the clockwise swirl is termed the addition of circulation. The amount of swirl 1circulation2 needed to have the flow leave the trailing edge smoothly is a function of the airfoil size and shape and can be calculated from potential flow 1inviscid2 theory 1see Section 6.6.3 and Ref. 292. Although the addition of circulation to make the flow field physically realistic may seem artificial, it has well-founded mathematical and physical grounds. For example, consider the flow past a finite length airfoil, as is indicated in Fig. 9.37. For lift-generating conditions the average pressure on the lower surface is greater than that on the upper surface. Near the tips of the wing this pressure difference will cause some of the fluid to attempt to migrate from the lower to the upper surface, as is indicated in Fig. 9.37b. At the same time, this fluid is swept downstream, forming a trailing vortex 1swirl2 from each wing tip 1see Fig. 4.32. It is speculated that the reason some birds migrate in vee-formation is to take advantage of the updraft produced by the trailing vortex of the preceding bird. [It is calculated that for a given expenditure of energy, a flock of 25 birds flying in vee-formation could travel 70% farther than if each bird were to fly separately 1Ref. 152.] The trailing vortices from the right and left wing tips are connected by the bound vortex along the length of the wing. It is this vortex that generates the circulation that produces the lift. The combined vortex system 1the bound vortex and the trailing vortices2 is termed a horseshoe vortex. The strength of the trailing vortices 1which is equal to the strength of the bound vortex2 is proportional to the lift generated. Large aircraft 1for example, a Boeing 7472 can generate very strong trailing vortices that persist for a long time before viscous effects and instability mechanisms finally cause them to die out. Such vortices are strong enough to flip smaller aircraft out of control if they follow too closely behind the large aircraft. The figure in the margin clearly shows a trailing vortex produced during a wake vortex study in which an airplane flew through a column of smoke.

9.4 Lift 519<br />

α = 0<br />

= 0<br />

(a)<br />

α > 0<br />

= 0<br />

(b)<br />

α > 0<br />

> 0<br />

(c)<br />

+ =<br />

"(a) + circulation = (c)"<br />

(d)<br />

F I G U R E 9.36 Inviscid<br />

flow past an airfoil: (a) symmetrical flow<br />

past the symmetrical airfoil at a zero<br />

angle of attack; (b) same airfoil at a<br />

nonzero angle of attack—no lift, flow<br />

near trailing edge not realistic; (c) same<br />

conditions as for (b) except circulation<br />

has been added to the flow—nonzero<br />

lift, realistic flow; (d) superposition of<br />

flows to produce the final flow past the<br />

airfoil.<br />

V9.19 Wing tip<br />

vortices<br />

(Photograph courtesy of<br />

NASA.)<br />

the flow pattern of Fig. 9.36b is changed to that of Fig. 9.36c2, and 122 the average velocity on the<br />

upper surface of the airfoil is increased while that on the lower surface is decreased. From the Bernoulli<br />

equation concepts 1i.e., pg V 2 2g z constant2, the average pressure on the upper surface is<br />

decreased and that on the lower surface is increased. The net effect is to change the original zero lift<br />

condition to that of a lift-producing airfoil.<br />

The addition of the clockwise swirl is termed the addition of circulation. The amount of<br />

swirl 1circulation2 needed to have the flow leave the trailing edge smoothly is a function of the<br />

airfoil size and shape and can be calculated from potential flow 1inviscid2 theory 1see Section 6.6.3<br />

and Ref. 292. Although the addition of circulation to make the flow field physically realistic may<br />

seem artificial, it has well-founded mathematical and physical grounds. For example, consider the<br />

flow past a finite length airfoil, as is indicated in Fig. 9.37. For lift-generating conditions the average<br />

pressure on the lower surface is greater than that on the upper surface. Near the tips of the<br />

wing this pressure difference will cause some of the <strong>fluid</strong> to attempt to migrate from the lower<br />

to the upper surface, as is indicated in Fig. 9.37b. At the same time, this <strong>fluid</strong> is swept downstream,<br />

forming a trailing vortex 1swirl2 from each wing tip 1see Fig. 4.32. It is speculated that the<br />

reason some birds migrate in vee-formation is to take advantage of the updraft produced by the<br />

trailing vortex of the preceding bird. [It is calculated that for a given expenditure of energy, a flock<br />

of 25 birds flying in vee-formation could travel 70% farther than if each bird were to fly separately<br />

1Ref. 152.]<br />

The trailing vortices from the right and left wing tips are connected by the bound vortex<br />

along the length of the wing. It is this vortex that generates the circulation that produces the<br />

lift. The combined vortex system 1the bound vortex and the trailing vortices2 is termed a horseshoe<br />

vortex. The strength of the trailing vortices 1which is equal to the strength of the bound<br />

vortex2 is proportional to the lift generated. Large aircraft 1for example, a Boeing 7472 can generate<br />

very strong trailing vortices that persist for a long time before viscous effects and instability<br />

mechanisms finally cause them to die out. Such vortices are strong enough to flip smaller<br />

aircraft out of control if they follow too closely behind the large aircraft. The figure in the margin<br />

clearly shows a trailing vortex produced during a wake vortex study in which an airplane<br />

flew through a column of smoke.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!