fluid_mechanics

claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa
from claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa More from this publisher
19.09.2019 Views

514 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immersed Bodies U p 0 U p 0 pdA τw dA p 0 dA ~ U 2 being of secondary importance. Hence, as indicated by the figure in the margin, for a given airfoil dθ (a) (b) 1.0 0.5 0 6 –0.5 4 –1.0 2 –1.5 0 0 π__ π__ ___ 3 π π 0 π__ π__ ___ 3 π π 4 2 4 4 2 4 θ, rad θ, rad (c) (d) F I G U R E E9.14 Note that the pressure contribution to the lift coefficient is or 0.88 whereas that due to the wall shear stress is only 1.961Re 12 2 0.001. The Reynolds number dependency of C L is l 944 lb quite minor. The lift is pressure dominated. Recall from Example There is a considerable tendency for the building to lift off the 9.9 that this is also true for the drag on a similar shape. From Eq. 4 with A 20 ft 50 ft 1000 ft 2 ground. Clearly this is due to the object being nonsymmetrical. , we obtain the The lift force on a complete circular cylinder is zero, although lift for the assumed conditions as the fluid forces do tend to pull the upper and lower halves l 1 2rU 2 AC L 1 2 10.00238 slugsft 3 2130 fts2 2 11000 ft 2 210.8812 apart. A typical device designed to produce lift does so by generating a pressure distribution that is different on the top and bottom surfaces. For large Reynolds number flows these pressure distributions are usually directly proportional to the dynamic pressure, rU 2 2, with viscous effects the lift is proportional to the square of the airspeed. Two airfoils used to produce lift are indicated in Fig. 9.32. Clearly the symmetrical one cannot produce lift unless the angle of attack, a, is nonzero. Because of the asymmetry of the nonsymmetric airfoil, the pressure distributions on the upper and U lower surfaces are different, and a lift is produced even with a 0. Of course, there will be a certain value of a 1less than zero for this case2 for which the lift is zero. For this situation, the pressure distributions on the upper and lower surfaces are different, but their resultant 1integrated2 pressure forces will be equal and opposite. Since most airfoils are thin, it is customary to use the planform area, A bc, in the definition of the lift coefficient. Here b is the length of the airfoil and c is the chord length—the length from the leading edge to the trailing edge as indicated in Fig. 9.32. Typical lift coefficients so defined are on the order of unity. That is, the lift force is on the order of the dynamic pressure times the planform area of the wing, l 1rU 2 22A. The wing loading, defined as the average lift per unit area of the wing, lA, therefore, increases with speed. For example, the wing loading of the C p sin θ = _______ p – p 0 sin θ F( θ) cos θ θ D/2

9.4 Lift 515 U α Symmetrical U α c Nonsymmetrical F I G U R E 9.32 nonsymmetrical airfoils. Symmetrical and Not stalled Stalled At large angles of attack the boundary layer separates and the wing stalls. 1903 Wright Flyer aircraft was 1.5 lbft 2 , while for the present-day Boeing 747 aircraft it is 150 lbft 2 . The wing loading for a bumble bee is approximately 1 lbft 2 1Ref. 152. Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack, a, and aspect ratio, a, are indicated in Figs. 9.33a and 9.33b. The aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the square of the wing length to the planform area, a b 2 A. If the chord length, c, is constant along the length of the wing 1a rectangular planform wing2, this reduces to a bc. In general, the lift coefficient increases and the drag coefficient decreases with an increase in aspect ratio. Long wings are more efficient because their wing tip losses are relatively more minor than for short wings. The increase in drag due to the finite length 1a 6 2 of the wing is often termed induced drag. It is due to the interaction of the complex swirling flow structure near the wing tips 1see Fig. 9.372 and the free stream 1Ref. 132. High-performance soaring airplanes and highly efficient soaring birds 1i.e., the albatross and sea gull2 have long, narrow wings. Such wings, however, have considerable inertia that inhibits rapid maneuvers. Thus, highly maneuverable fighter or acrobatic airplanes and birds 1i.e., the falcon2 have small-aspect-ratio wings. Although viscous effects and the wall shear stress contribute little to the direct generation of lift, they play an extremely important role in the design and use of lifting devices. This is because of the viscosity-induced boundary layer separation that can occur on nonstreamlined bodies such as airfoils that have too large an angle of attack 1see Fig. 9.182. As is indicated in Fig. 9.33, up to a certain point, the lift coefficient increases rather steadily with the angle of attack. If a is too large, the boundary layer on the upper surface separates, the flow over the wing develops a wide, turbulent wake region, the lift decreases, and the drag increases. This condition, as indicated by the figures in the margin, is termed stall. Such conditions are extremely dangerous if they occur while the airplane is flying at a low altitude where there is not sufficient time and altitude to recover from the stall. 1.4 1.2 1.0 = 7 = 3 0.8 0.6 C L 0.4 0.03 = 1 = 1 = 3 0.02 0.2 C D = 7 0 0.01 –0.2 –0.4 0 –10 0 10 20 –10 0 10 20 α , degrees α , degrees (a) (b) F I G U R E 9.33 Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and the aspect ratio of the airfoil: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.

9.4 Lift 515<br />

U<br />

α<br />

Symmetrical<br />

U<br />

α<br />

c<br />

Nonsymmetrical<br />

F I G U R E 9.32<br />

nonsymmetrical airfoils.<br />

Symmetrical and<br />

Not stalled<br />

Stalled<br />

At large angles of<br />

attack the boundary<br />

layer separates and<br />

the wing stalls.<br />

1903 Wright Flyer aircraft was 1.5 lbft 2 , while for the present-day Boeing 747 aircraft it is<br />

150 lbft 2 . The wing loading for a bumble bee is approximately 1 lbft 2 1Ref. 152.<br />

Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack, a, and aspect ratio, a,<br />

are indicated in Figs. 9.33a and 9.33b. The aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the square of the<br />

wing length to the planform area, a b 2 A. If the chord length, c, is constant along the length of<br />

the wing 1a rectangular planform wing2, this reduces to a bc.<br />

In general, the lift coefficient increases and the drag coefficient decreases with an increase<br />

in aspect ratio. Long wings are more efficient because their wing tip losses are relatively more minor<br />

than for short wings. The increase in drag due to the finite length 1a 6 2 of the wing is often<br />

termed induced drag. It is due to the interaction of the complex swirling flow structure near<br />

the wing tips 1see Fig. 9.372 and the free stream 1Ref. 132. High-performance soaring airplanes and<br />

highly efficient soaring birds 1i.e., the albatross and sea gull2 have long, narrow wings. Such wings,<br />

however, have considerable inertia that inhibits rapid maneuvers. Thus, highly maneuverable fighter<br />

or acrobatic airplanes and birds 1i.e., the falcon2 have small-aspect-ratio wings.<br />

Although viscous effects and the wall shear stress contribute little to the direct generation of<br />

lift, they play an extremely important role in the design and use of lifting devices. This is because of<br />

the viscosity-induced boundary layer separation that can occur on nonstreamlined bodies such as<br />

airfoils that have too large an angle of attack 1see Fig. 9.182. As is indicated in Fig. 9.33, up to a certain<br />

point, the lift coefficient increases rather steadily with the angle of attack. If a is too large, the<br />

boundary layer on the upper surface separates, the flow over the wing develops a wide, turbulent<br />

wake region, the lift decreases, and the drag increases. This condition, as indicated by the figures in<br />

the margin, is termed stall. Such conditions are extremely dangerous if they occur while the airplane<br />

is flying at a low altitude where there is not sufficient time and altitude to recover from the stall.<br />

1.4<br />

1.2<br />

1.0<br />

= 7<br />

= 3<br />

0.8<br />

0.6<br />

C L<br />

0.4<br />

0.03<br />

= 1 = 1 = 3<br />

0.02<br />

0.2<br />

C D<br />

= 7<br />

0<br />

0.01<br />

–0.2<br />

–0.4<br />

0<br />

–10 0 10<br />

20<br />

–10 0 10 20<br />

α , degrees<br />

α , degrees<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

F I G U R E 9.33 Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and the<br />

aspect ratio of the airfoil: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!