fluid_mechanics
514 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immersed Bodies U p 0 U p 0 pdA τw dA p 0 dA ~ U 2 being of secondary importance. Hence, as indicated by the figure in the margin, for a given airfoil dθ (a) (b) 1.0 0.5 0 6 –0.5 4 –1.0 2 –1.5 0 0 π__ π__ ___ 3 π π 0 π__ π__ ___ 3 π π 4 2 4 4 2 4 θ, rad θ, rad (c) (d) F I G U R E E9.14 Note that the pressure contribution to the lift coefficient is or 0.88 whereas that due to the wall shear stress is only 1.961Re 12 2 0.001. The Reynolds number dependency of C L is l 944 lb quite minor. The lift is pressure dominated. Recall from Example There is a considerable tendency for the building to lift off the 9.9 that this is also true for the drag on a similar shape. From Eq. 4 with A 20 ft 50 ft 1000 ft 2 ground. Clearly this is due to the object being nonsymmetrical. , we obtain the The lift force on a complete circular cylinder is zero, although lift for the assumed conditions as the fluid forces do tend to pull the upper and lower halves l 1 2rU 2 AC L 1 2 10.00238 slugsft 3 2130 fts2 2 11000 ft 2 210.8812 apart. A typical device designed to produce lift does so by generating a pressure distribution that is different on the top and bottom surfaces. For large Reynolds number flows these pressure distributions are usually directly proportional to the dynamic pressure, rU 2 2, with viscous effects the lift is proportional to the square of the airspeed. Two airfoils used to produce lift are indicated in Fig. 9.32. Clearly the symmetrical one cannot produce lift unless the angle of attack, a, is nonzero. Because of the asymmetry of the nonsymmetric airfoil, the pressure distributions on the upper and U lower surfaces are different, and a lift is produced even with a 0. Of course, there will be a certain value of a 1less than zero for this case2 for which the lift is zero. For this situation, the pressure distributions on the upper and lower surfaces are different, but their resultant 1integrated2 pressure forces will be equal and opposite. Since most airfoils are thin, it is customary to use the planform area, A bc, in the definition of the lift coefficient. Here b is the length of the airfoil and c is the chord length—the length from the leading edge to the trailing edge as indicated in Fig. 9.32. Typical lift coefficients so defined are on the order of unity. That is, the lift force is on the order of the dynamic pressure times the planform area of the wing, l 1rU 2 22A. The wing loading, defined as the average lift per unit area of the wing, lA, therefore, increases with speed. For example, the wing loading of the C p sin θ = _______ p – p 0 sin θ F( θ) cos θ θ D/2
9.4 Lift 515 U α Symmetrical U α c Nonsymmetrical F I G U R E 9.32 nonsymmetrical airfoils. Symmetrical and Not stalled Stalled At large angles of attack the boundary layer separates and the wing stalls. 1903 Wright Flyer aircraft was 1.5 lbft 2 , while for the present-day Boeing 747 aircraft it is 150 lbft 2 . The wing loading for a bumble bee is approximately 1 lbft 2 1Ref. 152. Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack, a, and aspect ratio, a, are indicated in Figs. 9.33a and 9.33b. The aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the square of the wing length to the planform area, a b 2 A. If the chord length, c, is constant along the length of the wing 1a rectangular planform wing2, this reduces to a bc. In general, the lift coefficient increases and the drag coefficient decreases with an increase in aspect ratio. Long wings are more efficient because their wing tip losses are relatively more minor than for short wings. The increase in drag due to the finite length 1a 6 2 of the wing is often termed induced drag. It is due to the interaction of the complex swirling flow structure near the wing tips 1see Fig. 9.372 and the free stream 1Ref. 132. High-performance soaring airplanes and highly efficient soaring birds 1i.e., the albatross and sea gull2 have long, narrow wings. Such wings, however, have considerable inertia that inhibits rapid maneuvers. Thus, highly maneuverable fighter or acrobatic airplanes and birds 1i.e., the falcon2 have small-aspect-ratio wings. Although viscous effects and the wall shear stress contribute little to the direct generation of lift, they play an extremely important role in the design and use of lifting devices. This is because of the viscosity-induced boundary layer separation that can occur on nonstreamlined bodies such as airfoils that have too large an angle of attack 1see Fig. 9.182. As is indicated in Fig. 9.33, up to a certain point, the lift coefficient increases rather steadily with the angle of attack. If a is too large, the boundary layer on the upper surface separates, the flow over the wing develops a wide, turbulent wake region, the lift decreases, and the drag increases. This condition, as indicated by the figures in the margin, is termed stall. Such conditions are extremely dangerous if they occur while the airplane is flying at a low altitude where there is not sufficient time and altitude to recover from the stall. 1.4 1.2 1.0 = 7 = 3 0.8 0.6 C L 0.4 0.03 = 1 = 1 = 3 0.02 0.2 C D = 7 0 0.01 –0.2 –0.4 0 –10 0 10 20 –10 0 10 20 α , degrees α , degrees (a) (b) F I G U R E 9.33 Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and the aspect ratio of the airfoil: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.
- Page 488 and 489: 464 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 490 and 491: 466 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 492 and 493: 468 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 494 and 495: 470 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 496 and 497: 472 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 498 and 499: 474 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 500 and 501: 476 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 502 and 503: 478 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 504 and 505: 480 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 506 and 507: 482 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 508 and 509: 484 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 510 and 511: 486 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 512 and 513: 488 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 514 and 515: 490 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 516 and 517: 492 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 518 and 519: 494 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 520 and 521: 496 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 522 and 523: 498 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 524 and 525: 500 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 526 and 527: 502 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 528 and 529: 504 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 530 and 531: 506 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 532 and 533: 508 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 534 and 535: 510 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 536 and 537: 512 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 540 and 541: 516 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 542 and 543: 518 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 544 and 545: 520 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 546 and 547: 522 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 548 and 549: 524 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 550 and 551: 526 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 552 and 553: 528 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 554 and 555: ∋ 530 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Imm
- Page 556 and 557: 532 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immerse
- Page 558 and 559: 10 Open-Channel Flow CHAPTER OPENIN
- Page 560 and 561: 536 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 562 and 563: 538 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 564 and 565: 540 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 566 and 567: 542 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 568 and 569: 544 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 570 and 571: 546 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 572 and 573: 548 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 574 and 575: 550 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 576 and 577: 552 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 578 and 579: 554 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 580 and 581: 556 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 582 and 583: 558 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 584 and 585: 560 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
- Page 586 and 587: 562 Chapter 10 ■ Open-Channel Flo
9.4 Lift 515<br />
U<br />
α<br />
Symmetrical<br />
U<br />
α<br />
c<br />
Nonsymmetrical<br />
F I G U R E 9.32<br />
nonsymmetrical airfoils.<br />
Symmetrical and<br />
Not stalled<br />
Stalled<br />
At large angles of<br />
attack the boundary<br />
layer separates and<br />
the wing stalls.<br />
1903 Wright Flyer aircraft was 1.5 lbft 2 , while for the present-day Boeing 747 aircraft it is<br />
150 lbft 2 . The wing loading for a bumble bee is approximately 1 lbft 2 1Ref. 152.<br />
Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack, a, and aspect ratio, a,<br />
are indicated in Figs. 9.33a and 9.33b. The aspect ratio is defined as the ratio of the square of the<br />
wing length to the planform area, a b 2 A. If the chord length, c, is constant along the length of<br />
the wing 1a rectangular planform wing2, this reduces to a bc.<br />
In general, the lift coefficient increases and the drag coefficient decreases with an increase<br />
in aspect ratio. Long wings are more efficient because their wing tip losses are relatively more minor<br />
than for short wings. The increase in drag due to the finite length 1a 6 2 of the wing is often<br />
termed induced drag. It is due to the interaction of the complex swirling flow structure near<br />
the wing tips 1see Fig. 9.372 and the free stream 1Ref. 132. High-performance soaring airplanes and<br />
highly efficient soaring birds 1i.e., the albatross and sea gull2 have long, narrow wings. Such wings,<br />
however, have considerable inertia that inhibits rapid maneuvers. Thus, highly maneuverable fighter<br />
or acrobatic airplanes and birds 1i.e., the falcon2 have small-aspect-ratio wings.<br />
Although viscous effects and the wall shear stress contribute little to the direct generation of<br />
lift, they play an extremely important role in the design and use of lifting devices. This is because of<br />
the viscosity-induced boundary layer separation that can occur on nonstreamlined bodies such as<br />
airfoils that have too large an angle of attack 1see Fig. 9.182. As is indicated in Fig. 9.33, up to a certain<br />
point, the lift coefficient increases rather steadily with the angle of attack. If a is too large, the<br />
boundary layer on the upper surface separates, the flow over the wing develops a wide, turbulent<br />
wake region, the lift decreases, and the drag increases. This condition, as indicated by the figures in<br />
the margin, is termed stall. Such conditions are extremely dangerous if they occur while the airplane<br />
is flying at a low altitude where there is not sufficient time and altitude to recover from the stall.<br />
1.4<br />
1.2<br />
1.0<br />
= 7<br />
= 3<br />
0.8<br />
0.6<br />
C L<br />
0.4<br />
0.03<br />
= 1 = 1 = 3<br />
0.02<br />
0.2<br />
C D<br />
= 7<br />
0<br />
0.01<br />
–0.2<br />
–0.4<br />
0<br />
–10 0 10<br />
20<br />
–10 0 10 20<br />
α , degrees<br />
α , degrees<br />
(a)<br />
(b)<br />
F I G U R E 9.33 Typical lift and drag coefficient data as a function of angle of attack and the<br />
aspect ratio of the airfoil: (a) lift coefficient, (b) drag coefficient.