19.09.2019 Views

fluid_mechanics

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

498 Chapter 9 ■ Flow over Immersed Bodies<br />

2.5<br />

•<br />

Flat plate<br />

normal to flow<br />

C D<br />

2.0<br />

1.5<br />

U<br />

<br />

D<br />

Re = UD<br />

v = 10 5<br />

b = length<br />

1.0<br />

<br />

C D =<br />

1<br />

ρU 2 bD<br />

2<br />

Flat plate<br />

0.5<br />

parallel to flow<br />

C D =<br />

<br />

1<br />

ρU 2 b<br />

2<br />

0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6<br />

<br />

D<br />

F I G U R E 9.19 Drag coefficient<br />

for an ellipse with the characteristic area either<br />

the frontal area, A bD, or the planform area,<br />

A b / (Ref. 5).<br />

Re < 1<br />

<br />

U<br />

= f(U, , )<br />

<br />

After all, it is the planform area on which the shear stress acts, rather than the much smaller 1for thin<br />

bodies2 frontal area. The ellipse drag coefficient based on the planform area, C D d1rU 2 b/22, is<br />

also shown in Fig. 9.19. Clearly the drag obtained by using either of these drag coefficients would be<br />

the same. They merely represent two different ways to package the same information.<br />

The amount of streamlining can have a considerable effect on the drag. Incredibly, the drag<br />

on the two two-dimensional objects drawn to scale in Fig. 9.20 is the same. The width of the wake<br />

for the streamlined strut is very thin, on the order of that for the much smaller diameter circular<br />

cylinder.<br />

Reynolds Number Dependence. Another parameter on which the drag coefficient can<br />

be very dependent is the Reynolds number. The main categories of Reynolds number dependence<br />

are 112 very low Reynolds number flow, 122 moderate Reynolds number flow 1laminar boundary<br />

layer2, and 132 very large Reynolds number flow 1turbulent boundary layer2. Examples of these three<br />

situations are discussed below.<br />

Low Reynolds number flows 1Re 6 12 are governed by a balance between viscous and pressure<br />

forces. Inertia effects are negligibly small. In such instances the drag on a threedimensional<br />

body is expected to be a function of the upstream velocity, U, the body size, /, and<br />

the viscosity, m. Thus, for a small grain of sand settling in a lake 1see margin figure2<br />

d f 1U, /, m2<br />

From dimensional considerations 1see Section 7.7.12<br />

d Cm/U<br />

(9.38)<br />

where the value of the constant C depends on the shape of the body. If we put Eq. 9.38 into dimensionless<br />

form using the standard definition of the drag coefficient, we obtain<br />

C D <br />

d<br />

1<br />

2rU 2 / 2Cm/U<br />

2 rU 2 / 2<br />

2C<br />

Re<br />

a = b<br />

U, ρ<br />

U, ρ<br />

10 D<br />

Diameter = D<br />

(a)<br />

(b)<br />

F I G U R E 9.20 Two objects of considerably different size that have the same drag force:<br />

(a) circular cylinder C D 1.2; (b) streamlined strut C D 0.12.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!