19.09.2019 Views

fluid_mechanics

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

406 Chapter 8 ■ Viscous Flow in Pipes<br />

25<br />

Experimental data<br />

20<br />

u ___<br />

u*<br />

15<br />

10<br />

Eq. 8.29<br />

Eq. 8.30<br />

Turbulent effects<br />

Pipe<br />

centerline<br />

5<br />

Viscous<br />

sublayer<br />

Viscous and<br />

turbulent effects<br />

0<br />

1 10 10<br />

2<br />

yu* ____<br />

v<br />

10 3 10 4<br />

F I G U R E 8.16<br />

Typical structure of the<br />

turbulent velocity profile in<br />

a pipe.<br />

A turbulent flow velocity<br />

profile can be<br />

divided into various<br />

regions.<br />

V8.8 Laminar to<br />

turbulent flow from<br />

a pipe<br />

where y R r is the distance measured from the wall, u is the time-averaged x component of velocity,<br />

and u* 1t wr2 1 2<br />

is termed the friction velocity. Note that u* is not an actual velocity of the<br />

<strong>fluid</strong>—it is merely a quantity that has dimensions of velocity. As is indicated in Fig. 8.16, Eq. 8.29<br />

1commonly called the law of the wall2 is valid very near the smooth wall, for<br />

Dimensional analysis arguments indicate that in the overlap region the velocity should vary<br />

as the logarithm of y. Thus, the following expression has been proposed:<br />

u<br />

2.5 ln ayu*<br />

u*<br />

(8.30)<br />

where the constants 2.5 and 5.0 have been determined experimentally. As is indicated in Fig. 8.16,<br />

for regions not too close to the smooth wall, but not all the way out to the pipe center, Eq. 8.30<br />

gives a reasonable correlation with the experimental data. Note that the horizontal scale is a logarithmic<br />

scale. This tends to exaggerate the size of the viscous sublayer relative to the remainder of<br />

the flow. As is shown in Example 8.4, the viscous sublayer is usually quite thin. Similar results<br />

can be obtained for turbulent flow past rough walls 1Ref. 172.<br />

A number of other correlations exist for the velocity profile in turbulent pipe flow. In the central<br />

region 1the outer turbulent layer2 the expression 1V c u2u* 2.5 ln1Ry2, where V c is the centerline<br />

velocity, is often suggested as a good correlation with experimental data. Another often-used<br />

1and relatively easy to use2 correlation is the empirical power-law velocity profile<br />

u<br />

V c<br />

a1 r R b 1n<br />

n b 5.0 0 yu*n f 5.<br />

(8.31)<br />

In this representation, the value of n is a function of the Reynolds number, as is indicated in<br />

Fig. 8.17. The one-seventh power-law velocity profile 1n 72 is often used as a reasonable approximation<br />

for many practical flows. Typical turbulent velocity profiles based on this power-law<br />

representation are shown in Fig. 8.18.<br />

A closer examination of Eq. 8.31 shows that the power-law profile cannot be valid near the<br />

wall, since according to this equation the velocity gradient is infinite there. In addition, Eq. 8.31<br />

cannot be precisely valid near the centerline because it does not give dudr 0 at r 0. However,<br />

it does provide a reasonable approximation to the measured velocity profiles across most of<br />

the pipe.<br />

Note from Fig. 8.18 that the turbulent profiles are much “flatter” than the laminar profile<br />

and that this flatness increases with Reynolds number 1i.e., with n2. Recall from Chapter 3 that

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!