fluid_mechanics

claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa
from claudia.marcela.becerra.rativa More from this publisher
19.09.2019 Views

362 Chapter 7 ■ Dimensional Analysis, Similitude, and Modeling E XAMPLE 7.6 Reynolds Number Similarity GIVEN Model tests are to be performed to study the flow through a large check valve having a 2-ft-diameter inlet and carrying water at a flowrate of 30 cfs as shown in Fig. E7.6a. The working fluid in the model is water at the same temperature as that in the prototype. Complete geometric similarity exists between model and prototype, and the model inlet diameter is 3 in. Q = 30 cfs FIND Determine the required flowrate in the model. (Q m = ?) SOLUTION To ensure dynamic similarity, the model tests should be run so that or where V and D correspond to the inlet velocity and diameter, respectively. Since the same fluid is to be used in model and prototype, n n m , and therefore The discharge, Q, is equal to VA, where A is the inlet area, so and for the data given Q m Q V mA m VA a D 31p42D 2 m 4 b D m 31p42D 2 4 D m D Re m Re V m D m n m V m VD n V D D m D = 2 ft (D m = 3 in.) F I G U R E E7.6a For this particular example, D mD 0.125, and the corresponding velocity scale is 8 (see Fig. E7.6b). Thus, with the prototype velocity equal to V 130 ft 3 s21p4212 ft2 2 9.50 fts, the required model velocity is V m 76.4 fts. Although this is a relatively large velocity, it could be attained in a laboratory facility. It is to be noted that if we tried to use a smaller model, say one with D 1 in., the required model velocity is 229 fts, a very high velocity that would be difficult to achieve. These results are indicative of one of the difficulties encountered in maintaining Reynolds number similarity—the required model velocities may be impractical to obtain. 25 20 15 Q m 13 12 ft2 12 ft2 Q m 3.75 cfs 130 ft 3 s2 (Ans) COMMENT As indicated by the above analysis, to maintain Reynolds number similarity using the same fluid in model and prototype, the required velocity scale is inversely proportional to the length scale, that is, V mV 1D mD2 1 . This strong influence of the length scale on the velocity scale is shown in Fig. E7.6b. V m /V 10 (0.125, 8) 5 0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 D m /D 0.8 1 F I G U R E E7.6b In some problems Reynolds number similarity may be relaxed. Two additional points should be made with regard to modeling flows in closed conduits. First, for large Reynolds numbers, inertial forces are much larger than viscous forces, and in this case it may be possible to neglect viscous effects. The important practical consequence of this is that it would not be necessary to maintain Reynolds number similarity between model and prototype. However, both model and prototype would have to operate at large Reynolds numbers. Since we do not know, a priori, what a “large Reynolds number” is, the effect of Reynolds numbers would

7.9 Some Typical Model Studies 363 have to be determined from the model. This could be accomplished by varying the model Reynolds number to determine the range 1if any2 over which the dependent pi term ceases to be affected by changes in Reynolds number. The second point relates to the possibility of cavitation in flow through closed conduits. For example, flow through the complex passages that may exist in valves may lead to local regions of high velocity 1and thus low pressure2, which can cause the fluid to cavitate. If the model is to be used to study cavitation phenomena, then the vapor pressure, p v , becomes an important variable and an additional similarity requirement such as equality of the cavitation number 1p r p v 2 1 2rV 2 is required, where p r is some reference pressure. The use of models to study cavitation is complicated, since it is not fully understood how vapor bubbles form and grow. The initiation of bubbles seems to be influenced by the microscopic particles that exist in most liquids, and how this aspect of the problem influences model studies is not clear. Additional details can be found in Ref. 17. Geometric and Reynolds number similarity is usually required for models involving flow around bodies. 7.9.2 Flow around Immersed Bodies Models have been widely used to study the flow characteristics associated with bodies that are completely immersed in a moving fluid. Examples include flow around aircraft, automobiles, golf balls, and buildings. 1These types of models are usually tested in wind tunnels as is illustrated in Fig. 7.6.2 Modeling laws for these problems are similar to those described in the preceding section; that is, geometric and Reynolds number similarity is required. Since there are no fluid interfaces, surface tension 1and therefore the Weber number2 is not important. Also, gravity will not affect the flow patterns, so the Froude number need not be considered. The Mach number will be important for high-speed flows in which compressibility becomes an important factor, but for incompressible fluids 1such as liquids or for gases at relatively low speeds2 the Mach number can be omitted as a similarity requirement. In this case, a general formulation for these problems is Dependent pi term f a / i / , e / , rV/ m b (7.18) V7.13 Wind engineering models where / is some characteristic length of the system and / i represents other pertinent lengths, e/ is the relative roughness of the surface 1or surfaces2, and rV/m is the Reynolds number. Frequently, the dependent variable of interest for this type of problem is the drag, d, developed on the body, and in this situation the dependent pi term would usually be expressed in the form of a drag coefficient, C D , where C D d 1 2rV 2 / 2 The numerical factor, 1 2, is arbitrary but commonly included, and / 2 is usually taken as some representative area of the object. Thus, drag studies can be undertaken with the formulation d 1 (7.19) 2rV 2 / C 2 D f a / i / , e / , rV/ m b F I G U R E 7.6 Model of the National Bank of Commerce, San Antonio, Texas, for measurement of peak, rms, and mean pressure distributions. The model is located in a long-test-section, meteorological wind tunnel. (Photograph courtesy of Cermak Peterka Petersen, Inc.)

362 Chapter 7 ■ Dimensional Analysis, Similitude, and Modeling<br />

E XAMPLE 7.6<br />

Reynolds Number Similarity<br />

GIVEN Model tests are to be performed to study the flow<br />

through a large check valve having a 2-ft-diameter inlet and<br />

carrying water at a flowrate of 30 cfs as shown in Fig. E7.6a.<br />

The working <strong>fluid</strong> in the model is water at the same temperature<br />

as that in the prototype. Complete geometric similarity exists<br />

between model and prototype, and the model inlet diameter<br />

is 3 in.<br />

Q = 30 cfs<br />

FIND<br />

Determine the required flowrate in the model.<br />

(Q m = ?)<br />

SOLUTION<br />

To ensure dynamic similarity, the model tests should be run so<br />

that<br />

or<br />

where V and D correspond to the inlet velocity and diameter, respectively.<br />

Since the same <strong>fluid</strong> is to be used in model and prototype,<br />

n n m , and therefore<br />

The discharge, Q, is equal to VA, where A is the inlet area, so<br />

and for the data given<br />

Q m<br />

Q V mA m<br />

VA<br />

a D 31p42D 2 m 4<br />

b<br />

D m 31p42D 2 4<br />

D m<br />

D<br />

Re m Re<br />

V m D m<br />

n m<br />

V m<br />

VD n<br />

V D D m<br />

D = 2 ft<br />

(D m = 3 in.)<br />

F I G U R E E7.6a<br />

For this particular example, D mD 0.125, and the corresponding<br />

velocity scale is 8 (see Fig. E7.6b). Thus, with the prototype<br />

velocity equal to V 130 ft 3 s21p4212 ft2 2 9.50 fts, the required<br />

model velocity is V m 76.4 fts. Although this is a relatively<br />

large velocity, it could be attained in a laboratory facility. It<br />

is to be noted that if we tried to use a smaller model, say one with<br />

D 1 in., the required model velocity is 229 fts, a very high velocity<br />

that would be difficult to achieve. These results are indicative<br />

of one of the difficulties encountered in maintaining<br />

Reynolds number similarity—the required model velocities may<br />

be impractical to obtain.<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

Q m 13 12 ft2<br />

12 ft2<br />

Q m 3.75 cfs<br />

130 ft 3 s2<br />

(Ans)<br />

COMMENT As indicated by the above analysis, to maintain<br />

Reynolds number similarity using the same <strong>fluid</strong> in model and<br />

prototype, the required velocity scale is inversely proportional to<br />

the length scale, that is, V mV 1D mD2 1 . This strong influence<br />

of the length scale on the velocity scale is shown in Fig. E7.6b.<br />

V m /V<br />

10<br />

(0.125, 8)<br />

5<br />

0<br />

0 0.2 0.4 0.6<br />

D m /D<br />

0.8 1<br />

F I G U R E E7.6b<br />

In some problems<br />

Reynolds number<br />

similarity may be<br />

relaxed.<br />

Two additional points should be made with regard to modeling flows in closed conduits.<br />

First, for large Reynolds numbers, inertial forces are much larger than viscous forces, and in this<br />

case it may be possible to neglect viscous effects. The important practical consequence of this is<br />

that it would not be necessary to maintain Reynolds number similarity between model and prototype.<br />

However, both model and prototype would have to operate at large Reynolds numbers. Since<br />

we do not know, a priori, what a “large Reynolds number” is, the effect of Reynolds numbers would

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!