16.09.2019 Views

InsideHistoryDigital

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

helped elevate the twins’ show. Indeed, from the<br />

1840s the freak show would become a respectable<br />

family affair attracting everyone from Queen<br />

Victoria to working-class men, women and<br />

children.<br />

On the other hand, medicine benefited from<br />

associating with Chang and Eng. The public were<br />

still sceptical of surgeons, so the medical<br />

endorsements were an exercise in public relations:<br />

surgeons were associating with the popular freak<br />

show and demonstrating an ability to view and<br />

inspect, not steal and dissect, the exceptional body<br />

(important when surgeons were renowned for<br />

relying on the dreaded body snatchers). And a<br />

relationship with the freak show meant access to<br />

the ‘freak’ body. There was a long tradition of<br />

surgeons getting their hands on the corpses of<br />

freak performers: the cadavers of the so-called Irish<br />

Giant Charles Byrne and the Sicilian Fairy Caroline<br />

Crachami found their way to the RCS, while the<br />

managers of Chang and Eng carried embalming<br />

fluid to preserve their corpses in case of sudden<br />

death. (3)<br />

Such was the friendliness between the medics and<br />

the managers that the surgeon George Bolton, a<br />

member of the RCS, could examine the twins<br />

intimately during their seven-month stay in<br />

London. Bolton delivered a report to his colleagues<br />

in April 1830, relaying how he had tested the<br />

sensitivity of the twins’ connecting band by poking<br />

it with a pin; he fed Chang an asparagus and sniffed<br />

the twins’ urine to decipher their ‘sanguineous<br />

communication’; and he even examined the twins’<br />

genitals, which they particularly resented.<br />

Nonetheless, Bolton could praise their ‘owners’<br />

(merchants who had effectively purchased the<br />

twins) for ‘the liberal manner in which they have<br />

uniformly afforded the means of investigating so<br />

curious an object of philosophical inquiry’.(4) The<br />

medical world and the freak show were happily<br />

united.<br />

But fast forward towards the end of the century.<br />

Chang and Eng had transitioned from freak<br />

performers to American farmers, fathers and<br />

slaveowners in the South (they had 21 children<br />

between them and were committed slaveowners).<br />

They continued to tour intermittently, displaying<br />

their offspring to gawping crowds, but the twins<br />

remained more concerned about their plantations<br />

in North Carolina than they did about their freak<br />

show careers. In 1874 the twins died aged sixty-two<br />

and, despite protestations from the family, the men<br />

of science finally got their sweaty palms on the<br />

corpses: Chang and Eng were dissected and their<br />

conjoined livers were displayed at the Mütter<br />

Museum in Philadelphia, where they can still be<br />

seen today.<br />

Medicine was increasingly colonising and<br />

controlling the ‘freak’ body. Indeed, Joseph Merrick,<br />

famously known as The Elephant Man, was taken<br />

from the freak show and contained within the<br />

London Hospital from 1884 until his dying days,<br />

under the careful watch of the eminent surgeon<br />

Frederick Treves. He condemned the freak show<br />

and Merrick’s London manager but, paradoxically,<br />

the surgeon became the showman: Treves<br />

exhibited Merrick at the Pathological Society of<br />

London; he controlled who saw, photographed and<br />

examined Merrick; and he capitalised on his<br />

association with The Elephant Man. When Merrick<br />

died in 1890, his body was handed over to Treves<br />

who dissected Merrick and arranged his skeleton<br />

for display in the Pathological Museum which,<br />

according to a contemporary surgeon, was ‘little<br />

better than a freak-museum’. (5)<br />

By the twentieth century, the rise of eugenics and<br />

social Darwinism led to a medical condemnation of<br />

freak shows which, it was increasingly believed,<br />

peddled physical deformity that threatened the<br />

nation’s health. The enigma of exceptional bodies<br />

was uncovered by the discovery of the endocrine<br />

system, ductless glands that regulate growth and<br />

secondary sexual functions; the X-Ray further<br />

exposed the inner realities of outward deformities.<br />

(6)<br />

Science was pathologizing the freak, killing the<br />

onstage mystique that had once been an essential<br />

part of the freak’s appeal. And freak performers<br />

increasingly went from the circuses and music halls<br />

to the laboratories and asylums as science gave the<br />

freak show a kiss of death.<br />

However, with shows like Embarrassing Bodies and<br />

documentaries peddling unusual bodies, the<br />

relationship between medicine and freakery<br />

lingers. Reality TV and programmes like The<br />

Undateables continue to rely on spectacle,<br />

titillation and voyeurism. Science might have<br />

marginalised the freak show in popular culture but<br />

remnants remain.<br />

The show, as they say,<br />

must go on.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!