You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Hesperornis, the premaxillary nail <strong>and</strong> m<strong>and</strong>ibular (lower jaw) nail were<br />
the most heavily keratinized parts of the beak. These “nails,” which often<br />
formed small hooks at the beak tips, are where the beaks would have been<br />
most solid, like typical modern bird bills. The same authors note that the<br />
simple presence of teeth in the maxilla <strong>and</strong> dentary of these species probably<br />
means that they entirely lacked the latericorn <strong>and</strong> ramicorn beak plates<br />
which normally cover the ‘lips’ of the jaws, <strong>and</strong> that the presence of hardened<br />
rhamphotheca on the edges of the<br />
jaws may be unique <strong>to</strong> modern <strong>birds</strong>.<br />
However, as noted above, the tip of the<br />
upper jaw (premaxilla) in Hesperornis<br />
is also <strong>to</strong>othless <strong>and</strong> provides space for<br />
an overhanging edge (<strong>to</strong>mia) of some<br />
kind <strong>to</strong> be present. This would have<br />
been somewhat softer tissue, like the<br />
more pliable bills of ducks <strong>and</strong> geese.<br />
Further support for the presence of a<br />
beak on the premaxilla comes from<br />
the presence of a “rhamphothecal<br />
groove” on the upper part in front of<br />
the naris (nasal opening in the skull),<br />
which likely served as an anchor point<br />
for the keratin on the skull.<br />
So how far did the beak extend?<br />
Heironymus & Witmer found<br />
that the latericorn almost always extends<br />
<strong>to</strong> the back of the subnarial bar<br />
in <strong>birds</strong>. This is a process of the premaxilla<br />
that extends back <strong>to</strong> separate<br />
the naris from the maxilla. This means<br />
that beaks will very rarely, if ever, extend<br />
on<strong>to</strong> the maxilla itself. The maxilla<br />
in Hesperornis even compensates<br />
for this limitation by extending a bit<br />
forward underneath the subnarial bar <strong>to</strong> extend the <strong>to</strong>oth row past the full<br />
extent of the beak.<br />
Based on the evidence above, in Hesperornis, the <strong>to</strong>othless, pointed<br />
beak tips would have been made of solid, normal keratin, while the rest of<br />
the beak would have been more like stiffened skin grading in<strong>to</strong> normal skin<br />
<strong>and</strong> feathers <strong>to</strong>ward the back of the skull. At no point would the teeth have<br />
occupied the same physical space as the rhamphotheca, though they may<br />
40<br />
Above: Evolution of the avian beak <strong>and</strong><br />
loss of teeth. From <strong>to</strong>p <strong>to</strong> bot<strong>to</strong>m: Archaeopteryx<br />
lithgraphica, Yixianornis<br />
grabaui, Hesperornis regalis, Polarornis<br />
gregorii. Not <strong>to</strong> scale.