A field guide to mesozoic birds and other winged dinosaurs

19.07.2019 Views

Barrett’s Seabird Enaliornis barretti Time: 100 Ma ago Location: England, UK Habitat: Cambridge Greensand Formation. Shores and lagoons surrounding semi-tropical islands in a shallow sea. Size: WS unknown; BL ~55cm (1.8ft); TL unknown Features: Marine hesperornitheans known from a partial skeleton & a number of fragments. Head small, but most of the skull & snout unknown. Legs very long, w/ long, robust tibia, short & stocky femur (probably less than half tibia length), & short but robust tarsus shorter than the femur. Distinguished by their small size, primitive characteristics, & internal characteristics of the hind limbs & pelvis (lack of femoral neck, mid-sized antitrochantor, keel beneath the synsacrum). Biology: These small seabirds combined some features in common with more advanced hesperornitheans, while retaining some primitive features found in ichthyornitheans & other carinatans. They were therefore probably coastal divers or dippers which may have retained some flight ability, though the wing is not known. Tanke’s Pasquia Bird Pasquiaornis tankei Time: 95 Ma ago Location: Saskatchewan, Canada Habitat: Ashville Formation, nearshore marine enviornment in the northern Western Interior Seaway Size: WS >36cm (1.2ft); BL ~70cm (2.3ft); TL unknown Features: Jaws long & toothed. Wings relatively long. Legs long & slender. Biology: The legs were positioned more directly under the body than in later hesperornitheans, possibly allowing a waddling gait on land. The toes could not twist during proportion as in lobed-toe birds, indicating normally webbed feet. The relatively long & robust wing bones suggest possible retention of flight ability, though the sternum is unknown. Probably surface swimmers (Sanchez 2012). Varner’s Brodkorb Bird Brodavis varneri Time: 78 Ma ago Location: Kansas, USA Habitat: Sharon Springs Member, Pierre Shale Formation. Relatively shallow river deltas and estuaries opening into the Western Interior Seaway. Size: WS unknown; BL ~90cm (3ft); TL unknown Features: Marine hesperornitheans. Body long & barrel-shaped, w/ short torso & long hips. Legs very long, w/ tibia over half the length of the torso + hips. Tarsus short & stocky, less than ¼ tibia length. Neck long, probably equal in length to torso + hips. Wings unknown. Biology: The hip bones of these birds were not as advanced & highly fused as in related species. This, compared w/ the robust foot bones, may suggest a slightly different method of underwater propulsion compared w/ similar species inhabiting deeper saltwater environments off the coasts. The skeleton was overall more lightly built & not as solid as other hesperornitheans. This implies a more limited diving ability, restricting these birds to near-surface feeding. The lighter skeleton may also suggest some flight ability was retained. 166

167

Barrett’s Seabird Enaliornis barretti<br />

Time: 100 Ma ago Location: Engl<strong>and</strong>, UK Habitat: Cambridge Greens<strong>and</strong> Formation.<br />

Shores <strong>and</strong> lagoons surrounding semi-tropical isl<strong>and</strong>s in a shallow sea. Size: WS unknown;<br />

BL ~55cm (1.8ft); TL unknown Features: Marine hesperornitheans known from a partial<br />

skele<strong>to</strong>n & a number of fragments. Head small, but most of the skull & snout unknown.<br />

Legs very long, w/ long, robust tibia, short & s<strong>to</strong>cky femur (probably less than half tibia<br />

length), & short but robust tarsus shorter than the femur. Distinguished by their small<br />

size, primitive characteristics, & internal characteristics of the hind limbs & pelvis (lack<br />

of femoral neck, mid-sized antitrochan<strong>to</strong>r, keel beneath the synsacrum). Biology: These<br />

small sea<strong>birds</strong> combined some features in common with more advanced hesperornitheans,<br />

while retaining some primitive features found in ichthyornitheans & <strong>other</strong> carinatans.<br />

They were therefore probably coastal divers or dippers which may have retained some<br />

flight ability, though the wing is not known.<br />

Tanke’s Pasquia Bird Pasquiaornis tankei<br />

Time: 95 Ma ago Location: Saskatchewan, Canada Habitat: Ashville Formation, nearshore<br />

marine enviornment in the northern Western Interior Seaway Size: WS >36cm<br />

(1.2ft); BL ~70cm (2.3ft); TL unknown Features: Jaws long & <strong>to</strong>othed. Wings relatively<br />

long. Legs long & slender. Biology: The legs were positioned more directly under the body<br />

than in later hesperornitheans, possibly allowing a waddling gait on l<strong>and</strong>. The <strong>to</strong>es could<br />

not twist during proportion as in lobed-<strong>to</strong>e <strong>birds</strong>, indicating normally webbed feet. The<br />

relatively long & robust wing bones suggest possible retention of flight ability, though the<br />

sternum is unknown. Probably surface swimmers (Sanchez 2012).<br />

Varner’s Brodkorb Bird Brodavis varneri<br />

Time: 78 Ma ago Location: Kansas, USA Habitat: Sharon Springs Member, Pierre Shale<br />

Formation. Relatively shallow river deltas <strong>and</strong> estuaries opening in<strong>to</strong> the Western Interior<br />

Seaway. Size: WS unknown; BL ~90cm (3ft); TL unknown Features: Marine hesperornitheans.<br />

Body long & barrel-shaped, w/ short <strong>to</strong>rso & long hips. Legs very long, w/ tibia<br />

over half the length of the <strong>to</strong>rso + hips. Tarsus short & s<strong>to</strong>cky, less than ¼ tibia length. Neck<br />

long, probably equal in length <strong>to</strong> <strong>to</strong>rso + hips. Wings unknown. Biology: The hip bones<br />

of these <strong>birds</strong> were not as advanced & highly fused as in related species. This, compared<br />

w/ the robust foot bones, may suggest a slightly different method of underwater propulsion<br />

compared w/ similar species inhabiting deeper saltwater environments off the coasts.<br />

The skele<strong>to</strong>n was overall more lightly built & not as solid as <strong>other</strong> hesperornitheans. This<br />

implies a more limited diving ability, restricting these <strong>birds</strong> <strong>to</strong> near-surface feeding. The<br />

lighter skele<strong>to</strong>n may also suggest some flight ability was retained.<br />

166

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!