09.07.2019 Views

Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Unusual Ectopic Pregnancies<br />

Diagnoses: Female <strong>Pelvis</strong><br />

○ Look for hemoperitoneum around the liver<br />

• MR: Generally not necessary <strong>and</strong> avoided in first trimester<br />

unless clinical situation warrants<br />

○ Consider when ultrasound findings are equivocal or<br />

preoperative planning for large ectopics<br />

– Can delineate anatomy, location of placenta, <strong>and</strong><br />

vascular supply before intervention<br />

○ Useful in evaluating for congenital uterine anomalies<br />

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS<br />

Intrauterine Pregnancy vs. Interstitial<br />

• High or eccentric implantation can be confusing<br />

• Should always have normal myometrial coverage<br />

• Angular pregnancy: May descend or grow into cavity<br />

Tubal Ectopic vs. Interstitial EP<br />

• Can be confusing if adjacent to uterine cornua<br />

• Use ultrasound probe to gently separate structures<br />

Septate Uterus vs. Interstitial EP<br />

• Implantation in one horn gives eccentric appearance<br />

• Myometrium completely surrounds GS<br />

• 3D US helpful in showing 2 uterine cavities<br />

Scar EP vs. IUP or Abortion in Progress<br />

• Thin overlying myometrium or uterine serosa<br />

• May bulge uterine contour at C-section scar if large enough<br />

• If not diagnosed, reports of becoming placenta accreta<br />

Abortion in Progress vs. Cervical EP<br />

• Centrally located products of conception, ± open internal<br />

os; may move during the examination<br />

○ May be displaced with gentle pressure<br />

• Cardiac activity <strong>and</strong> trophoblastic flow are more suggestive<br />

of cervical EP with vascularity from adjacent cervical tissue<br />

○ Cardiac activity occasionally seen with Ab in progress<br />

Corpus Luteum vs. Ovarian EP<br />

• Extremely difficult to differentiate from ovarian EP unless<br />

YS or embryo is seen<br />

• Corpus luteum wall less echogenic than trophoblast<br />

• Very rare compared to ubiquitous corpus luteum<br />

CLINICAL ISSUES<br />

Presentation<br />

• Most common signs/symptoms<br />

○ Pelvic/abdominal pain; vaginal bleeding, palpable mass<br />

• Other signs/symptoms<br />

○ Hypotension <strong>and</strong> shock if presenting with rupture<br />

○ May be an incidental or subtle finding on early US<br />

• Risk factors<br />

○ Sexually transmitted disease or pelvic inflammatory<br />

disease; prior tubal surgery, especially salpingectomy;<br />

prior ectopic pregnancy; assisted reproductive<br />

technology pregnancies; previous uterine, cervical<br />

surgery, or dilatation <strong>and</strong> curettage; endometriosis;<br />

indwelling intrauterine contraceptive devices; Asherman<br />

syndrome; fibroids<br />

Demographics<br />

• Age<br />

○ Majority of EP are detected in women > 35 years<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

○ EP outside the fallopian tube occurs in 3-5% of cases<br />

○ Interstitial 2-4%; scar < 1%; cervical < 1%; ovarian 0.15-<br />

3%; abdominal 1-3%<br />

Natural History & Prognosis<br />

• Overall, ↑ morbidity <strong>and</strong> mortality than for usual tubal EP<br />

○ Mortality rate 0.14% for usual tubal EP vs. 2-2.5% for<br />

interstitial EP <strong>and</strong> up to 20% for abdominal EP<br />

○ Improved blood supply from myometrium, cervix, or<br />

parasitized visceral arterial supply allow EP to grow<br />

larger <strong>and</strong> present later<br />

○ Increased risk of uterine rupture <strong>and</strong> hemorrhage<br />

○ Potential exsanguination<br />

• Good outcome with preserved future fertility often<br />

possible with appropriate treatment<br />

• Important to distinguish cornual EP from interstitial EP or<br />

angular pregnancy → different outcomes<br />

○ Cornual EP: High risk of recurrence<br />

○ Angular pregnancy: Can progress to live birth; ↑ risk for<br />

spontaneous abortion (38%) <strong>and</strong> uterine rupture (23%)<br />

Treatment<br />

• Tailored to individual patients based on clinical<br />

presentation, size of GS, presence of cardiac activity, <strong>and</strong><br />

maternal hemodynamic stability<br />

• Conservative treatments: Generally favored for interstitial<br />

EP due to ↑ complication risk with surgery<br />

○ Systemic methotrexate: Requires close follow-up <strong>and</strong><br />

possibly additional doses<br />

– Failed treatment goes to surgery<br />

○ Local sac injection: Methotrexate or potassium chloride;<br />

etoposide also used<br />

– Via laparoscopy or ultrasound guidance<br />

• Surgical intervention: Laparoscopy or laparotomy<br />

○ Recommended treatment for cornual EP because of<br />

suggested increased risk of recurrence<br />

○ Rupture may require hysterectomy<br />

• Uterine artery embolization may be coupled with other<br />

treatments to control or reduce hemorrhage<br />

• Expectant management<br />

○ Considered only if small sac <strong>and</strong> no living embryo<br />

DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST<br />

Consider<br />

• 3D ultrasound for improved spatial orientation of sac to<br />

endometrial cavity<br />

Image Interpretation Pearls<br />

• Diagnosis of unusual ectopic pregnancy can be difficult<br />

○ Need high degree of suspicion, especially in a high-risk<br />

patient<br />

○ Short term follow-up for any eccentric or unusually<br />

located GS<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

1. Ghaneie A et al: Unusual Ectopic Pregnancies: Sonographic Findings <strong>and</strong><br />

Implications for Management. J <strong>Ultrasound</strong> Med. 34(6):951-962, 2015<br />

2. Parker RA 3rd et al: MR imaging findings of ectopic pregnancy: a pictorial<br />

review. Radiographics. 32(5):1445-60; discussion 1460-2, 2012<br />

782

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!