Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis
PART II SECTION 9 Bowel Approach to Bowel Sonography 642 Appendicitis 646 652 Intussusception 656 Epiploic Appendagitis 660 Diverticulitis 664 Crohn Disease 668 674
Approach to Bowel Sonography 642 Diagnoses: Bowel Introduction Assessment of the bowel with ultrasound has been undervalued due to the commonly held perception that artifact (notably from gas in the lumen of the bowel) will limit visibility. The lack of awareness of normal and diseased bowel, limited technical expertise, and prolonged time of study are some compounding factors that have lead to a significant inconsistency in radiology departments for the application of ultrasound in the assessment of the bowel. US is safe, noninvasive, inexpensive, and does not use ionizing radiation. Real-time images can be obtained to provide a dynamic assessment. With the appropriate skills and knowledge, ultrasound has a valuable role in the assessment of patients with suspected and known bowel diseases. US remains the first-line imaging modality in acute abdominal conditions, particularly in Europe, hence a systematic approach and familiarity of the sonographic appearances of the spectrum of diseases affecting the bowel is crucial. Anatomy-Based Imaging Issues The gut is a long, tortuous, confluent hollow viscus that has a reproducible stratified layered pattern on ultrasound referred to as the gut signature. This alternating layered pattern corresponds to distinct histological layers of the normal bowel wall. Five sonographic layers are identified as alternating hyperechoic and hypoechoic layers. These consecutive layers from innermost (layer 1) to outermost (layer 5) are listed below. • Layer 1: Interface of lumen and mucosa • Layer 2: Muscularis mucosa • Layer 3: Submucosa • Layer 4: Muscularis propria • Layer 5: Serosa There are typically three hyperechoic layers (layer 1, 3, and 5). These three hyperechoic layers are the interface of the lumen and mucosa, submucosa and serosa. The hypoechoic layers (layers 2 and 4) represent the two respective muscular layers; the muscularis mucosa (inner) and muscularis propria (outer), respectively. The number of visible layers depends on: • Frequency of transducer • Proximity of transducer to gut wall The trade off between the improved resolution with a highfrequency probe is the depth of penetration of the sound beam. It is ideal to maximize the frequency to obtain the best permissible resolution; however, this is reliant on the body habitus of the patient. On a routine 5 MHz curvilinear probe, the transverse section of the bowel demonstrates a stratified target-like appearance with an inner hyperechoic layer representing the submucosa and a hypoechoic outer rim of the muscularis propria. Using high-resolution linear transducer (12-18 MHz), the five distinct layers can be readily appreciated. On axial imaging, a pattern of concentric rings of alternating bands of hyper and hypoechoic rings can be seen. The technological advances in transducers, combined with endoscopy, have lead to the evolution of endoscopic ultrasound technique. This represents the combined endoscopic and ultrasound assessment of the gut wall. The direct contact of the ultrasound transducer with the gut wall and high-frequency transducer allows for a focused assessment of a lesion, depiction of the depth of penetration in relation to the gut wall layers and lumen. In addition, histological assessment with needle biopsy is now also possible using this minimally invasive technique. Normal bowel has an average maximal single wall thickness of 3-5 mm dependent on the degree of distension. Fixed points of the bowel are easier to assess with transabdominal ultrasound: C loop of the duodenum, ileocecal junction, rectum, and recto sigmoid. Features of small bowel loops are the central location, presence of valvulae conniventes, and active bowel peristalsis. In contrast, the colon has a heterogenous haustral pattern associated with a prominent linear arc of gas and posterior reverberation artefact. Clinical Implications US of the bowel: • Can be part of routine abdominal scan for nonspecific broad range of abdominal symptoms • Has an established focused role in suspected acute GI conditions, such as acute appendicitis, pyloric stenosis, and intussusception, especially in children and young adults • Can be used for dedicated assessment of chronic gutrelated disorders In patients with Crohn disease, ultrasound has a role in: • Detection of disease • Evaluation of disease extent • Detection of complication such as formation of abscess, fistula, or obstruction • Assessment of activity and follow-up of disease Given the increasing use of ultrasound as the first-line modality, in addition to the standard assessment of the solid abdominal viscera, it is crucial for the operator to have an understanding of the principles of bowel ultrasound to avoid overlooking a GI tract-related diagnosis. The value is significantly felt in the younger population where ultrasound is much better tolerated and can significantly reduce the radiation burden of unjustified CT scans. One of the inherent strengths of performing ultrasound is the instant clinical history and specific detail that is directly available from the patient. Ultrasound becomes an extension of the clinical examination and facilitates the diagnostic process. With accurate history and clinical signs, the operator can formulate a tailored approach to the ultrasound examination. Note that sonographic findings often overlap, hence the clinical history is crucial to determine the accurate diagnosis. Imaging Technique Routine transabdominal assessment of the bowel is typically performed after assessment of the solid abdominal viscera. The assessment of the bowel starts by using a standard 5 MHz curvilinear transducer. While scanning, it is important to optimize the settings, in particular the focal point and dynamic contrast, to enhance image quality. Recognizing useful landmarks such as the interface of the peritoneum with the abdominal wall and the psoas muscle provides an indicator of the depth of assessment and is helpful to avoid any confusion at the outset.
- Page 612 and 613: Myelolipoma (Left) Longitudinal US
- Page 614 and 615: Adrenal Adenoma TERMINOLOGY Synonym
- Page 616 and 617: Adrenal Adenoma (Left) Longitudinal
- Page 618 and 619: Adrenal Cyst TERMINOLOGY Definition
- Page 620 and 621: Pheochromocytoma TERMINOLOGY Defini
- Page 622 and 623: Pheochromocytoma (Left) Longitudina
- Page 624 and 625: Adrenal Carcinoma TERMINOLOGY Synon
- Page 626 and 627: Adrenal Carcinoma (Left) Transverse
- Page 628 and 629: PART II SECTION 8 Abdominal Wall/Pe
- Page 630 and 631: Approach to Sonography of Abdominal
- Page 632 and 633: Approach to Sonography of Abdominal
- Page 634 and 635: Abdominal Wall Hernia TERMINOLOGY D
- Page 636 and 637: Abdominal Wall Hernia (Left) Transv
- Page 638 and 639: Abdominal Wall Hernia (Left) Transv
- Page 640 and 641: Groin Hernia TERMINOLOGY Definition
- Page 642 and 643: Groin Hernia (Left) Graphic shows a
- Page 644 and 645: Groin Hernia (Left) Longitudinal ul
- Page 646 and 647: Ascites TERMINOLOGY Definitions •
- Page 648 and 649: Ascites (Left) Transverse ultrasoun
- Page 650 and 651: Peritoneal Carcinomatosis TERMINOLO
- Page 652 and 653: Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (Left) Lo
- Page 654 and 655: Peritoneal Carcinomatosis (Left) Tr
- Page 656 and 657: Peritoneal Space Abscess TERMINOLOG
- Page 658 and 659: Peritoneal Space Abscess (Left) Tra
- Page 660 and 661: Segmental Omental Infarction TERMIN
- Page 664 and 665: Approach to Bowel Sonography Given
- Page 666 and 667: Approach to Bowel Sonography (Left)
- Page 668 and 669: Appendicitis TERMINOLOGY Definition
- Page 670 and 671: Appendicitis (Left) Axial ultrasoun
- Page 672 and 673: Appendicitis (Left) Axial ultrasoun
- Page 674 and 675: Appendiceal Mucocele TERMINOLOGY De
- Page 676 and 677: Appendiceal Mucocele (Left) Sagitta
- Page 678 and 679: Intussusception TERMINOLOGY Definit
- Page 680 and 681: Intussusception (Left) Transverse t
- Page 682 and 683: Epiploic Appendagitis TERMINOLOGY A
- Page 684 and 685: Epiploic Appendagitis (Left) Graysc
- Page 686 and 687: Diverticulitis TERMINOLOGY Definiti
- Page 688 and 689: Diverticulitis (Left) Acute diverti
- Page 690 and 691: Crohn Disease TERMINOLOGY Synonyms
- Page 692 and 693: Crohn Disease (Left) Long-axis ultr
- Page 694 and 695: Crohn Disease (Left) Long-axis ultr
- Page 696 and 697: Large Bowel Malignancy TERMINOLOGY
- Page 698 and 699: Large Bowel Malignancy (Left) Hepat
- Page 700 and 701: PART II SECTION 10 Scrotum Introduc
- Page 702 and 703: Approach to Scrotal Sonography (Lef
- Page 704 and 705: Testicular Germ Cell Tumors TERMINO
- Page 706 and 707: Testicular Germ Cell Tumors (Left)
- Page 708 and 709: Gonadal Stromal Tumors, Testis TERM
- Page 710 and 711: Gonadal Stromal Tumors, Testis (Lef
Approach to Bowel Sonography<br />
642<br />
Diagnoses: Bowel<br />
Introduction<br />
Assessment of the bowel with ultrasound has been<br />
undervalued due to the commonly held perception that<br />
artifact (notably from gas in the lumen of the bowel) will limit<br />
visibility. The lack of awareness of normal <strong>and</strong> diseased bowel,<br />
limited technical expertise, <strong>and</strong> prolonged time of study are<br />
some compounding factors that have lead to a significant<br />
inconsistency in radiology departments for the application of<br />
ultrasound in the assessment of the bowel. US is safe,<br />
noninvasive, inexpensive, <strong>and</strong> does not use ionizing radiation.<br />
Real-time images can be obtained to provide a dynamic<br />
assessment. With the appropriate skills <strong>and</strong> knowledge,<br />
ultrasound has a valuable role in the assessment of patients<br />
with suspected <strong>and</strong> known bowel diseases. US remains the<br />
first-line imaging modality in acute abdominal conditions,<br />
particularly in Europe, hence a systematic approach <strong>and</strong><br />
familiarity of the sonographic appearances of the spectrum of<br />
diseases affecting the bowel is crucial.<br />
Anatomy-Based Imaging Issues<br />
The gut is a long, tortuous, confluent hollow viscus that has a<br />
reproducible stratified layered pattern on ultrasound referred<br />
to as the gut signature. This alternating layered pattern<br />
corresponds to distinct histological layers of the normal bowel<br />
wall.<br />
Five sonographic layers are identified as alternating<br />
hyperechoic <strong>and</strong> hypoechoic layers. These consecutive layers<br />
from innermost (layer 1) to outermost (layer 5) are listed<br />
below.<br />
• Layer 1: Interface of lumen <strong>and</strong> mucosa<br />
• Layer 2: Muscularis mucosa<br />
• Layer 3: Submucosa<br />
• Layer 4: Muscularis propria<br />
• Layer 5: Serosa<br />
There are typically three hyperechoic layers (layer 1, 3, <strong>and</strong> 5).<br />
These three hyperechoic layers are the interface of the lumen<br />
<strong>and</strong> mucosa, submucosa <strong>and</strong> serosa. The hypoechoic layers<br />
(layers 2 <strong>and</strong> 4) represent the two respective muscular layers;<br />
the muscularis mucosa (inner) <strong>and</strong> muscularis propria (outer),<br />
respectively.<br />
The number of visible layers depends on:<br />
• Frequency of transducer<br />
• Proximity of transducer to gut wall<br />
The trade off between the improved resolution with a highfrequency<br />
probe is the depth of penetration of the sound<br />
beam. It is ideal to maximize the frequency to obtain the best<br />
permissible resolution; however, this is reliant on the body<br />
habitus of the patient.<br />
On a routine 5 MHz curvilinear probe, the transverse section<br />
of the bowel demonstrates a stratified target-like appearance<br />
with an inner hyperechoic layer representing the submucosa<br />
<strong>and</strong> a hypoechoic outer rim of the muscularis propria.<br />
Using high-resolution linear transducer (12-18 MHz), the five<br />
distinct layers can be readily appreciated. On axial imaging, a<br />
pattern of concentric rings of alternating b<strong>and</strong>s of hyper <strong>and</strong><br />
hypoechoic rings can be seen.<br />
The technological advances in transducers, combined with<br />
endoscopy, have lead to the evolution of endoscopic<br />
ultrasound technique. This represents the combined<br />
endoscopic <strong>and</strong> ultrasound assessment of the gut wall. The<br />
direct contact of the ultrasound transducer with the gut wall<br />
<strong>and</strong> high-frequency transducer allows for a focused<br />
assessment of a lesion, depiction of the depth of penetration<br />
in relation to the gut wall layers <strong>and</strong> lumen. In addition,<br />
histological assessment with needle biopsy is now also<br />
possible using this minimally invasive technique.<br />
Normal bowel has an average maximal single wall thickness of<br />
3-5 mm dependent on the degree of distension.<br />
Fixed points of the bowel are easier to assess with<br />
transabdominal ultrasound: C loop of the duodenum, ileocecal<br />
junction, rectum, <strong>and</strong> recto sigmoid.<br />
Features of small bowel loops are the central location,<br />
presence of valvulae conniventes, <strong>and</strong> active bowel peristalsis.<br />
In contrast, the colon has a heterogenous haustral pattern<br />
associated with a prominent linear arc of gas <strong>and</strong> posterior<br />
reverberation artefact.<br />
Clinical Implications<br />
US of the bowel:<br />
• Can be part of routine abdominal scan for nonspecific<br />
broad range of abdominal symptoms<br />
• Has an established focused role in suspected acute GI<br />
conditions, such as acute appendicitis, pyloric stenosis,<br />
<strong>and</strong> intussusception, especially in children <strong>and</strong> young<br />
adults<br />
• Can be used for dedicated assessment of chronic gutrelated<br />
disorders<br />
In patients with Crohn disease, ultrasound has a role in:<br />
• Detection of disease<br />
• Evaluation of disease extent<br />
• Detection of complication such as formation of abscess,<br />
fistula, or obstruction<br />
• Assessment of activity <strong>and</strong> follow-up of disease<br />
Given the increasing use of ultrasound as the first-line<br />
modality, in addition to the st<strong>and</strong>ard assessment of the solid<br />
abdominal viscera, it is crucial for the operator to have an<br />
underst<strong>and</strong>ing of the principles of bowel ultrasound to avoid<br />
overlooking a GI tract-related diagnosis. The value is<br />
significantly felt in the younger population where ultrasound<br />
is much better tolerated <strong>and</strong> can significantly reduce the<br />
radiation burden of unjustified CT scans.<br />
One of the inherent strengths of performing ultrasound is the<br />
instant clinical history <strong>and</strong> specific detail that is directly<br />
available from the patient. <strong>Ultrasound</strong> becomes an extension<br />
of the clinical examination <strong>and</strong> facilitates the diagnostic<br />
process. With accurate history <strong>and</strong> clinical signs, the operator<br />
can formulate a tailored approach to the ultrasound<br />
examination. Note that sonographic findings often overlap,<br />
hence the clinical history is crucial to determine the accurate<br />
diagnosis.<br />
Imaging Technique<br />
Routine transabdominal assessment of the bowel is typically<br />
performed after assessment of the solid abdominal viscera.<br />
The assessment of the bowel starts by using a st<strong>and</strong>ard 5 MHz<br />
curvilinear transducer. While scanning, it is important to<br />
optimize the settings, in particular the focal point <strong>and</strong> dynamic<br />
contrast, to enhance image quality. Recognizing useful<br />
l<strong>and</strong>marks such as the interface of the peritoneum with the<br />
abdominal wall <strong>and</strong> the psoas muscle provides an indicator of<br />
the depth of assessment <strong>and</strong> is helpful to avoid any confusion<br />
at the outset.