Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

09.07.2019 Views

Urolithiasis TERMINOLOGY Abbreviations • Ureterovesicular junction (UVJ); ureteropelvic junction (UPJ); intravenous pyelogram (IVP) Synonyms • Urinary tract stone, urinary calculous disease, nephrolithiasis, ureterolithiasis, vesicolithiasis Definitions • Macroscopic concretions of crystals in urinary system, sometimes mixed with proteins IMAGING General Features • Location ○ Renal stones: Upper pole, mid kidney (interpolar region), lower pole ○ Ureter stones: Can divide ureter into UPJ, proximal, mid, distal, and UVJ – Iliac vessels are an important landmark for treatment planning: Divide ureter into UPJ, proximal (UPJ to iliac vessels), distal (iliac vessels to UVJ), and UVJ ○ Bladder stones Ultrasonographic Findings • Grayscale ultrasound ○ Advantages: No ionizing radiation, inexpensive, accessible ○ Disadvantages: Operator dependent, deep ureter difficult to visualize, limited sensitivity for < 5 mm stone, overestimates stone size relative to CT, limited in obese patients ○ Calculi = echogenic foci with sharp posterior acoustic shadowing ○ For renal stones > 5 mm: 96% sensitivity, nearly 100% specificity ○ May be difficult to detect small, nonshadowing renal and ureteral calculi, unless there is obstruction – Most calculi missed by US are < 3 mm, which are more likely to pass spontaneously without intervention ○ Optimize technique – Fast for 4 hours to decrease bowel gas and hydrate to fill bladder – Maximize shadowing by placing single focal zone at or slightly deep to stone – Always include bladder with attention to UVJ □ Roll patient to show mobility of bladder calculus ○ Valuable for follow-up imaging, especially in patients with stones & renal colic or those not improving on treatment • Color Doppler ○ Twinkling artifact: Focus of alternating colors on color Doppler behind rough, reflective object – Helps ID otherwise occult stone that blends with renal sinus fat; more sensitive than acoustic shadowing – ↑ sensitivity compared with grayscale alone, but also ↑false-positives (up to 51%) ○ Should see ureteral jets intermittently and bilaterally – High-grade obstruction: Ureteral jet almost always absent – Low-grade obstruction: May (~ 1/3) or may not have absent ureteral jet □ Asymmetric decrease or continuous low-amplitude jet on affected side Radiographic Findings • Radiography ○ ~ 90% of calculi are radiopaque; calcium stones > struvite & cystine stones – More sensitive than CT scout image (63% vs. 47%) – Valuable for planning treatment (e.g., ESWL) & monitoring stone burden – Disadvantages: Limited sensitivity (~ 60%); limiting factors: Bowel gas, extrarenal calcification, obesity ○ Radiolucent: Uric acid, xanthine, pure matrix, drug stones, 2,8-dihydroxyadenine • IVP ○ Formerly study of choice; has been replaced by CT ○ Fails to detect calculi in 31-48% of cases CT Findings • NECT ○ Preferred imaging modality to confirm stone in adult patients with acute flank pain ○ Virtually all stones are visible (including those radiolucent on KUB) except pure matrix stones and protease inhibitor stones (e.g., indinavir) ○ Advantages: Fast, no IV contrast, high sensitivity (nearly 100%), allows detection of unsuspected abnormalities, useful for treatment planning ○ CT attenuation measurements (highest to lowest) for evaluating stone composition – Calcium oxalate monohydrate and brushite (1700- 2800 HU) – Calcium phosphate (1200-1600 HU) – Cystine (600-1100 HU) – Struvite (600-900 HU) – Uric acid (200-450 HU) – 35-65% of stones are of mixed composition; CT attenuation measurements most valuable in differentiating 100% uric acid stones from others ○ Ureterolithiasis – Direct sign: Visualization of calculus within ureteral lumen; ureteral dilation may be absent – Secondary signs: Most reliable: Hydroureter/hydronephrosis, perinephric stranding, periureteral edema, and unilateral renal enlargement – "Soft tissue rim" sign = ureteral stone: Soft tissue halo around calcific focus = ureteral wall edema around stone; highly specific (≥ 90%) for ureteral stone – "Comet tail" sign = phlebolith: Eccentric, tapering soft tissue density adjacent to calcification = noncalcified portion of pelvic vein and phlebolith; specificity nearly 100% for phlebolith – Phlebolith: Central lucency, calculus, nearly all are centrally dense ○ Best way to measure stone size is with bone windows and magnification ○ Randall plaque = stone precursor; subepithelial calcification seen as whitish build-up in papillary tips Diagnoses: Urinary Tract 449

Urolithiasis Diagnoses: Urinary Tract • CECT ○ CT lucent stones →filling defects ○ In select cases, CT IVP may help differentiate distal ureteral stone from phlebolith • Dual-energy CT (DECT): Scanning at different energies (80 and 140 kVp) allows better stone characterization ○ Can differentiate: Urate stones from other stones; struvite from cystine stones→ both relevant for treatment planning MR Findings • Virtually all stones = signal voids • Ureteral calculi: Abrupt change in ureter caliber indicates obstruction level; secondary signs DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Nephrocalcinosis (NC) • Calcification within parenchyma: Medullary NC (most common) & cortical NC • Often associated with urolithiasis Papillary Necrosis • Calcified sloughed papilla • Nonshadowing echoes within medullary cavities; empty medullary cavities after passed sloughed papilla Emphysematous Pyelonephritis (EP), Pyelitis • Gas within renal parenchyma (pyelonephritis) or renal collecting system (pyelitis) with dirty shadowing PATHOLOGY General Features • Etiology ○ Exact mechanism is unknown, but concept of urinary supersaturation is essential ○ Low urine volume/dehydration (most common) ○ Metabolic: Commonly hypercalciuria, hyperuricosuria,hypocitraturia, hyperoxaluria ○ Urine composition: pH, crystal inhibitors, stone-forming substances ○ Disease states: Obesity, RTA type 1, IBD, medullary sponge kidney, sarcoid, etc. ○ UTI, including urease-producing bacteria (Klebsiella, Proteus, Pseudomonas, some Staphylococci) ○ Sedentary lifestyle, immobilization ○ Anatomic: Urinary obstruction or stasis ○ Medications: Protease inhibitors (Indinavir), supplements (e.g., ephedrine), triamterene, sulfonamides • Types of stones ○ Calcium-based stones (70-80%): Calcium oxalate monohydrate and dihydrate, calcium phosphate ○ Struvite (5-15%): Magnesium ammonium phosphate ○ Uric acid (5-10%) ○ Cystine (1-2.5%) ○ Other (< 5%): Xanthine, matrix, drugs,2,8- dihydroxyadenine ○ Acute flank pain, renal colic ○ Associated symptoms: Microscopic or gross hematuria, nausea, and vomiting Demographics • Gender ○ M > F • Epidemiology ○ Up to 14% of men and 6% of women develop stones Natural History & Prognosis • Spontaneous ureteral stone passage based on size ○ > 8 mm rarely pass without intervention ○ 95% of stones up to 4 mm pass within 40 days • Complications: Obstruction, infection, and renal insufficiency • Recurrence rate is ~ 75% over 20 years Treatment • Options for upper tract urolithiasis ○ Surveillance (trial of passage): Hydration & pain relief; medical expulsive therapy (MET) ○ Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) ○ Ureteroscopy and endoscopic lithotripsy (URS) ○ Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) ○ Dissolution (chemolysis) ○ Open or laparoscopic surgery • Size, number, location, obstruction or infection, and anatomic findings (aberrant vasculature, distorted pelvicalyceal architecture) all impact treatment ○ Urate stones (< 450 HU): Only stones efficiently treated with oral chemolysis (alkalinization) ○ CT findings that ↓ success of ESWL: Lower pole stone location, larger stone size, high-attenuation (> 1000 HU) and cystine stones, larger stone-to-skin distance ○ > 1000 HU→ URS or PCNL • For renal stones: 0.5-1.5 cm stones → increasing popularity of URS due to high stone-free rates ○ < 1 cm: Asymptomatic →observation; symptomatic→ SWL or URS ○ 1-2 cm→ SWL or PCNL ○ > 2 cm or staghorn→ PCNL – Staghorn calculi →progressive renal damage and persistent infection; treatment goal: Complete stone removal • For ureteral stones: < 10 mm→ MET or SWL, URS; > 10 mm→ SWL or URS SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Spettel S et al: Using Hounsfield unit measurement and urine parameters to predict uric acid stones. Urology. 82(1):22-6, 2013 2. Cheng PM et al: What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 2--CT findings, reporting, and treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(6):W548-54, 2012 3. Cheng PM et al: What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part 1--pathogenesis, types, assessment, and variant anatomy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(6):W540-7, 2012 450 CLINICAL ISSUES Presentation • Most common signs/symptoms

Urolithiasis<br />

Diagnoses: Urinary Tract<br />

• CECT<br />

○ CT lucent stones →filling defects<br />

○ In select cases, CT IVP may help differentiate distal<br />

ureteral stone from phlebolith<br />

• Dual-energy CT (DECT): Scanning at different energies (80<br />

<strong>and</strong> 140 kVp) allows better stone characterization<br />

○ Can differentiate: Urate stones from other stones;<br />

struvite from cystine stones→ both relevant for<br />

treatment planning<br />

MR Findings<br />

• Virtually all stones = signal voids<br />

• Ureteral calculi: Abrupt change in ureter caliber indicates<br />

obstruction level; secondary signs<br />

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS<br />

Nephrocalcinosis (NC)<br />

• Calcification within parenchyma: Medullary NC (most<br />

common) & cortical NC<br />

• Often associated with urolithiasis<br />

Papillary Necrosis<br />

• Calcified sloughed papilla<br />

• Nonshadowing echoes within medullary cavities; empty<br />

medullary cavities after passed sloughed papilla<br />

Emphysematous Pyelonephritis (EP), Pyelitis<br />

• Gas within renal parenchyma (pyelonephritis) or renal<br />

collecting system (pyelitis) with dirty shadowing<br />

PATHOLOGY<br />

General Features<br />

• Etiology<br />

○ Exact mechanism is unknown, but concept of urinary<br />

supersaturation is essential<br />

○ Low urine volume/dehydration (most common)<br />

○ Metabolic: Commonly hypercalciuria,<br />

hyperuricosuria,hypocitraturia, hyperoxaluria<br />

○ Urine composition: pH, crystal inhibitors, stone-forming<br />

substances<br />

○ Disease states: Obesity, RTA type 1, IBD, medullary<br />

sponge kidney, sarcoid, etc.<br />

○ UTI, including urease-producing bacteria (Klebsiella,<br />

Proteus, Pseudomonas, some Staphylococci)<br />

○ Sedentary lifestyle, immobilization<br />

○ Anatomic: Urinary obstruction or stasis<br />

○ Medications: Protease inhibitors (Indinavir), supplements<br />

(e.g., ephedrine), triamterene, sulfonamides<br />

• Types of stones<br />

○ Calcium-based stones (70-80%): Calcium oxalate<br />

monohydrate <strong>and</strong> dihydrate, calcium phosphate<br />

○ Struvite (5-15%): Magnesium ammonium phosphate<br />

○ Uric acid (5-10%)<br />

○ Cystine (1-2.5%)<br />

○ Other (< 5%): Xanthine, matrix, drugs,2,8-<br />

dihydroxyadenine<br />

○ Acute flank pain, renal colic<br />

○ Associated symptoms: Microscopic or gross hematuria,<br />

nausea, <strong>and</strong> vomiting<br />

Demographics<br />

• Gender<br />

○ M > F<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

○ Up to 14% of men <strong>and</strong> 6% of women develop stones<br />

Natural History & Prognosis<br />

• Spontaneous ureteral stone passage based on size<br />

○ > 8 mm rarely pass without intervention<br />

○ 95% of stones up to 4 mm pass within 40 days<br />

• Complications: Obstruction, infection, <strong>and</strong> renal<br />

insufficiency<br />

• Recurrence rate is ~ 75% over 20 years<br />

Treatment<br />

• Options for upper tract urolithiasis<br />

○ Surveillance (trial of passage): Hydration & pain relief;<br />

medical expulsive therapy (MET)<br />

○ Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL)<br />

○ Ureteroscopy <strong>and</strong> endoscopic lithotripsy (URS)<br />

○ Percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL)<br />

○ Dissolution (chemolysis)<br />

○ Open or laparoscopic surgery<br />

• Size, number, location, obstruction or infection, <strong>and</strong><br />

anatomic findings (aberrant vasculature, distorted<br />

pelvicalyceal architecture) all impact treatment<br />

○ Urate stones (< 450 HU): Only stones efficiently treated<br />

with oral chemolysis (alkalinization)<br />

○ CT findings that ↓ success of ESWL: Lower pole stone<br />

location, larger stone size, high-attenuation (> 1000 HU)<br />

<strong>and</strong> cystine stones, larger stone-to-skin distance<br />

○ > 1000 HU→ URS or PCNL<br />

• For renal stones: 0.5-1.5 cm stones → increasing popularity<br />

of URS due to high stone-free rates<br />

○ < 1 cm: Asymptomatic →observation; symptomatic→<br />

SWL or URS<br />

○ 1-2 cm→ SWL or PCNL<br />

○ > 2 cm or staghorn→ PCNL<br />

– Staghorn calculi →progressive renal damage <strong>and</strong><br />

persistent infection; treatment goal: Complete stone<br />

removal<br />

• For ureteral stones: < 10 mm→ MET or SWL, URS; > 10<br />

mm→ SWL or URS<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

1. Spettel S et al: Using Hounsfield unit measurement <strong>and</strong> urine parameters to<br />

predict uric acid stones. Urology. 82(1):22-6, 2013<br />

2. Cheng PM et al: What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part<br />

2--CT findings, reporting, <strong>and</strong> treatment. AJR Am J Roentgenol.<br />

198(6):W548-54, 2012<br />

3. Cheng PM et al: What the radiologist needs to know about urolithiasis: part<br />

1--pathogenesis, types, assessment, <strong>and</strong> variant anatomy. AJR Am J<br />

Roentgenol. 198(6):W540-7, 2012<br />

450<br />

CLINICAL ISSUES<br />

Presentation<br />

• Most common signs/symptoms

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!