Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

09.07.2019 Views

Cholangiocarcinoma TERMINOLOGY Synonyms • Cholangiocellular carcinoma or bile duct adenocarcinoma Definitions • Malignancy that arises from intrahepatic bile duct (IHBD)or extrahepatic bile duct epithelium IMAGING General Features • Best diagnostic clue ○ Intra- or extrahepatic bile duct mass with upstream bile duct dilatation • Location ○ Distribution in different segments of biliary tree – Distal common bile duct (CBD): 30-50%, most common extrahepatic location – Proximal CBD: 15-30% – Common hepatic duct (CHD): 14-37% – Confluence of hepatic ducts (Klatskin tumor): 10-26% – Isolated right or left IHBD: 8-13% – Cystic duct: 6% ○ Classification based on anatomy or radiography – Peripheral (10%): Intrahepatic; proximal to secondary biliary radicles – Hilar (50%): Klatskin tumor; confluence of hepatic ducts – Distal (40%): Extrahepatic; distal CBD • Size ○ Intrahepatic mass: A few cm up to 20 cm ○ Extrahepatic: Typically present when smaller • Morphology ○ Classification by Liver Cancer Study Group of Japan – Mass-forming type – Periductal-infiltrating type – Intraductal-growing type Ultrasonographic Findings • Grayscale ultrasound ○ Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – Mass with ill-defined margin, mixed and heterogeneous echotexture – Isolated thickening of IHBD or intraductal mass, with upstream ductal dilatation ○ Hilar cholangiocarcinoma (Klatskin tumor) – Dilatation of intrahepatic ducts without extrahepatic ductal dilatation – Apparent nonunion of dilated right and left IHBDs – Primary tumor may not be discernible, or appears as small infiltrative iso-/hyperechoic mass in hilar region – Nodular or polypoid mass in bile ducts – Mass effect, invasion of portal vein and hepatic artery ○ Extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma – Dilatation of intrahepatic and proximal extrahepatic bile duct □ Primary tumor often undetectable due to its deep location – Ill-defined, solid, heterogeneous mass within or surrounding duct at point of obstruction □ May be exophytic: Heterogeneous mass arising from bile duct □ May be intraluminal: Polypoid iso-/hyperechoic mass within bile duct ○ Other signs of malignancy – Infiltration of liver parenchyma – Lymphatic spread; commonly to porta hepatis, paraceliac and peripancreatic lymph nodes – Liver metastases Radiographic Findings • Cholangiography (PTC/ERCP) ○ Intraductal filling defect with upstream ductal dilatation ○ Ductal wall irregularity and shouldering ○ "Missing duct" sign: Unopacified segmental IHBDs upstream to tumor (ERCP) ○ Infiltrating type: Frequently long, rarely short concentric focal stricture ○ Klatskin tumor: Nonunion of left and right IHBDs CT Findings • NECT ○ Intrahepatic/hilar: Peripheral hypodense lesions with IHBD proximal to obstruction ○ Extrahepatic: Large growth (seen as hypodense mass) and IHBD dilatation • CECT ○ Arterial phase: Peripheral enhancement with progressive, central patchy enhancement and IHBD dilatation ○ Portal venous phase: Moderate enhancement of thickened bile duct wall, vascular invasion, lymphadenopathy ○ Delayed phase (10-15 min): Persistent enhancing tumor due to fibrous stroma MR Findings • T1WI:Iso-/hypointense • T2WI:Hyperintense periphery (viable) and hypointense center (fibrosis) • T1WI C+:Superior to CT in detecting small hilar tumors, intrahepatic and periductal tumor infiltration • T1WI FS: Tumor of intrapancreatic portion of CBD seen as hypointense against hyperintense pancreatic head • MRCP: Reveals site of obstruction and extension of tumor growth Imaging Recommendations • Best imaging tool ○ US: Detection and initial assessment of level and cause of biliary obstruction ○ ERCP/MRCP: Extent of biliary ductal involvement ○ CECT/CEMR: More detailed tumor extent (liver invasion, porta hepatis involvement, regional nodal metastases) DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Pancreatic Head Adenocarcinoma • Irregular hypoechoic mass in pancreatic head on US • Abrupt obstruction of pancreatic duct &/or distal CBD • Early invasion of celiac axis and superior mesenteric vessels common • Obliteration of retropancreatic fat Diagnoses: Biliary System 335

Cholangiocarcinoma Diagnoses: Biliary System Choledocholithiasis • Intra- and extrahepatic bile duct stones with ductal dilatation • Echogenic filling defects with posterior acoustic shadowing • Biliary sludge of medium echoes mimic intraluminal form of extrahepatic tumor • May see ductal wall thickening due to superimposed cholangitis Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis • Ductal wall thickening due to repeated and longstanding cholangitis • Intrahepatic biliary stones and echogenic biliary sludge • Accompanies atrophy of involved hepatic segment &/or biliary cirrhosis • Present clinically with repeated episodes of acute ascending cholangitis Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC) • Multiple strictures associated with beading and peripheral pruning of bile ducts • Bile duct wall thickening • Risk for cholangiocarcinoma: 10% of PSC patients Porta Hepatis Tumor • Bulky primary tumor (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]), lymph node metastasis, metastasis • May invade or obstruct IHBDs and cause dilatation PATHOLOGY General Features • Etiology ○ Biliary intraepithelial neoplasm is considered premalignant lesion ○ Risk factors – Primary sclerosing cholangitis – Choledochal cyst – Biliary papillomatosis – Parasites (clonorchiasis, Opisthorchis) – Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis – Ulcerative colitis – Chronic liver disease – Thorotrast exposure • Patterns of disease progression ○ Local extension along bile duct ○ Local infiltration of liver parenchyma ○ Spread to regional lymph nodes; porta hepatis, paraceliac and peripancreatic lymph node (LN) ○ Perineural spread ○ Intraperitoneal seeding (peritoneal carcinomatosis) ○ Hematogenous spread Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features • Bismuth-Corlette classification of Klatskin tumor ○ I: Tumor involving CHD below confluence ○ II: Tumor involving CHD reaching confluence ○ IIIa: Tumor involving right 2nd-order branch ○ IIIb: Tumor involving left 2nd-order branch ○ IV: Tumor involving both 2nd-order branches Microscopic Features • Sclerosing type: Stricture, most common type, worst prognosis • Nodular type: Exophytic intrahepatic masses • Papillary type: Intraluminal polypoid lesions, least common type, best prognosis CLINICAL ISSUES Presentation • Most common signs/symptoms ○ Painless obstructive jaundice, pain, palpable mass, weight loss • Lab data:↑ bilirubin/alkaline phosphatase,↑ CEA/CA19-9 Demographics • Age: Peak at 6th-7th decade • Gender: M:F = 3:2 • Epidemiology ○ More common in Asia ○ Causes 15-33% of primary hepatobiliary cancers ○ 2nd most common primary hepatic tumor (after HCC) Natural History & Prognosis • 5-year survival rate: 5-10% • Resectability rate: Distal 91%, hilar 56%, peripheral 60% Treatment • Surgical resection (only potentially curative method) + adjuvant chemoradiation • Palliative treatment: Chemotherapy, radiation; laser therapy; biliary stenting DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST Consider • Rule out other biliary & pancreatic pathologies that can mimic cholangiocarcinoma by obstructing extrahepatic bile duct Image Interpretation Pearls • Long and rarely short focal extrahepatic biliary stricture, irregular ductal wall, stenosis and prestenotic biliary ductal dilatation • Klatskin tumor: Small tumor at confluence of right/left hepatic and proximal common hepatic ducts SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Chung YE et al: Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologicpathologic correlation. Radiographics. 29(3):683-700, 2009 2. Vilgrain V: Staging cholangiocarcinoma by imaging studies. HPB (Oxford). 10(2):106-9, 2008 3. Han JK et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT and cholangiographic findings. Radiographics. 22(1):173-87, 2002 336

Cholangiocarcinoma<br />

Diagnoses: Biliary System<br />

Choledocholithiasis<br />

• Intra- <strong>and</strong> extrahepatic bile duct stones with ductal<br />

dilatation<br />

• Echogenic filling defects with posterior acoustic shadowing<br />

• Biliary sludge of medium echoes mimic intraluminal form of<br />

extrahepatic tumor<br />

• May see ductal wall thickening due to superimposed<br />

cholangitis<br />

Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis<br />

• Ductal wall thickening due to repeated <strong>and</strong> longst<strong>and</strong>ing<br />

cholangitis<br />

• Intrahepatic biliary stones <strong>and</strong> echogenic biliary sludge<br />

• Accompanies atrophy of involved hepatic segment &/or<br />

biliary cirrhosis<br />

• Present clinically with repeated episodes of acute<br />

ascending cholangitis<br />

Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis (PSC)<br />

• Multiple strictures associated with beading <strong>and</strong> peripheral<br />

pruning of bile ducts<br />

• Bile duct wall thickening<br />

• Risk for cholangiocarcinoma: 10% of PSC patients<br />

Porta Hepatis Tumor<br />

• Bulky primary tumor (e.g., hepatocellular carcinoma [HCC]),<br />

lymph node metastasis, metastasis<br />

• May invade or obstruct IHBDs <strong>and</strong> cause dilatation<br />

PATHOLOGY<br />

General Features<br />

• Etiology<br />

○ Biliary intraepithelial neoplasm is considered<br />

premalignant lesion<br />

○ Risk factors<br />

– Primary sclerosing cholangitis<br />

– Choledochal cyst<br />

– Biliary papillomatosis<br />

– Parasites (clonorchiasis, Opisthorchis)<br />

– Recurrent pyogenic cholangitis<br />

– Ulcerative colitis<br />

– Chronic liver disease<br />

– Thorotrast exposure<br />

• Patterns of disease progression<br />

○ Local extension along bile duct<br />

○ Local infiltration of liver parenchyma<br />

○ Spread to regional lymph nodes; porta hepatis,<br />

paraceliac <strong>and</strong> peripancreatic lymph node (LN)<br />

○ Perineural spread<br />

○ Intraperitoneal seeding (peritoneal carcinomatosis)<br />

○ Hematogenous spread<br />

Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features<br />

• Bismuth-Corlette classification of Klatskin tumor<br />

○ I: Tumor involving CHD below confluence<br />

○ II: Tumor involving CHD reaching confluence<br />

○ IIIa: Tumor involving right 2nd-order branch<br />

○ IIIb: Tumor involving left 2nd-order branch<br />

○ IV: Tumor involving both 2nd-order branches<br />

Microscopic Features<br />

• Sclerosing type: Stricture, most common type, worst<br />

prognosis<br />

• Nodular type: Exophytic intrahepatic masses<br />

• Papillary type: Intraluminal polypoid lesions, least common<br />

type, best prognosis<br />

CLINICAL ISSUES<br />

Presentation<br />

• Most common signs/symptoms<br />

○ Painless obstructive jaundice, pain, palpable mass,<br />

weight loss<br />

• Lab data:↑ bilirubin/alkaline phosphatase,↑ CEA/CA19-9<br />

Demographics<br />

• Age: Peak at 6th-7th decade<br />

• Gender: M:F = 3:2<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

○ More common in Asia<br />

○ Causes 15-33% of primary hepatobiliary cancers<br />

○ 2nd most common primary hepatic tumor (after HCC)<br />

Natural History & Prognosis<br />

• 5-year survival rate: 5-10%<br />

• Resectability rate: Distal 91%, hilar 56%, peripheral 60%<br />

Treatment<br />

• Surgical resection (only potentially curative method) +<br />

adjuvant chemoradiation<br />

• Palliative treatment: Chemotherapy, radiation; laser<br />

therapy; biliary stenting<br />

DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST<br />

Consider<br />

• Rule out other biliary & pancreatic pathologies that can<br />

mimic cholangiocarcinoma by obstructing extrahepatic bile<br />

duct<br />

Image Interpretation Pearls<br />

• Long <strong>and</strong> rarely short focal extrahepatic biliary stricture,<br />

irregular ductal wall, stenosis <strong>and</strong> prestenotic biliary ductal<br />

dilatation<br />

• Klatskin tumor: Small tumor at confluence of right/left<br />

hepatic <strong>and</strong> proximal common hepatic ducts<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

1. Chung YE et al: Varying appearances of cholangiocarcinoma: radiologicpathologic<br />

correlation. Radiographics. 29(3):683-700, 2009<br />

2. Vilgrain V: Staging cholangiocarcinoma by imaging studies. HPB (Oxford).<br />

10(2):106-9, 2008<br />

3. Han JK et al: Cholangiocarcinoma: pictorial essay of CT <strong>and</strong> cholangiographic<br />

findings. Radiographics. 22(1):173-87, 2002<br />

336

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!