Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis
Choledocholithiasis TERMINOLOGY Abbreviations • Cholangiolithiasis, hepatolithiasis, biliary calculi, common bile duct (CBD) stones Definitions • Choledocholithiasis: Extrahepatic ductal stones/calculi • Hepatolithiasis: Intrahepatic stones/calculi IMAGING General Features • Best diagnostic clue ○ Echogenic focus within bile duct, casting posterior acoustic shadowing • Location ○ Intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts – More common in CBD • Size ○ Variable • Morphology ○ Classified into 2 main types based on origin – Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation within bile duct □ Calculi are composed predominantly of bilirubin (> 90% calcium bilirubinate composition) □ Brown pigment stones are associated with bacterial infections – Secondary choledocholithiasis (more common): Gallstone migration from gallbladder to bile ducts □ Calculi are composed primarily of cholesterol Ultrasonographic Findings • Grayscale ultrasound ○ Appearance depends on site, size, and composition of stones ○ Extrahepatic biliary stones – Most commonly seen within CBD □ Most often within lumen of periampullary region/distal portion of CBD – Classic appearance: Rounded echogenic lesion with posterior acoustic shadowing – Can be associated with extrahepatic and intrahepatic ductal dilatation ○ Intrahepatic biliary stones – Majority appear as highly echogenic foci with posterior acoustic shadowing – Located in region of portal triads paralleling course of intrahepatic portal veins – Small (< 5 mm) or soft pigmented stones may not produce posterior shadowing – Larger stone may cause biliary obstruction with focal intrahepatic ductal dilatation – Duct is filled with stones, appears as linear echogenic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing ○ 10% stones: No posterior acoustic shadow – Small size, soft, and porous composition ○ CBD/intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (IHBD) based on stone size, degree, and duration of obstruction ○ Transabdominal US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 20% and 78%, may be obscured distally by bowel gas ○ Endoscopic US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 94% and 98% • Color Doppler ○ Echogenic focus is avascular, may show "twinkling" artifact ○ Aids definition of dilated biliary ducts against background intrahepatic parenchymal vessels Radiographic Findings • ERCP ○ Radiolucent filling defects within intrahepatic ± extrahepatic bile ducts ○ Potentially therapeutic: Portal for stone retrieval, sphincterotomy, or internal stent insertion ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 90- 95%, considered "gold standard" • Intraoperative and postoperative (T tube) cholangiography ○ Direct test for detection of CBD stones ○ Meniscus of contrast material clearly outlines margins of stones CT Findings • NECT ○ Attenuation of calculi varies from less than water density, through soft tissue, to dense calcification – Typically high-density filling defect within biliary duct ○ Abrupt termination of CBD by obstructing stone ○ CBD &/or IHBD dilatation – Varies depending on stone size, degree, and duration of obstruction ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 67-88% MR Findings • MRCP ○ Bile: T2 hyperintense signal ○ Ductal stones: T2 hypointense foci ○ Calculi manifest as low intensity filling defects within increased signal intensity bile ducts ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 81-100% Imaging Recommendations • Best imaging tool ○ US, MRCP • Protocol advice ○ CBD stones are most commonly located in region of ampulla of Vater – High chance of being obscured by bowel gas ○ Practical advice to optimize detection – Examine patient in different positions: Supine, left lateral oblique, sitting upright – Use firm probe pressure to collapse superficial bowel and its content – Perform detailed assessment of head region of pancreas ○ Postcholecystectomy patients with persistent RUQ pain – Image after fasting and 45 min to 1 hr after fatty meal ○ If gas obscures CBD; have patient drink 6-12 oz of water – Keep patient in right decubitus position for 2-3 minutes and rescan in semierect position Diagnoses: Biliary System 329
Choledocholithiasis 330 Diagnoses: Biliary System DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Cholangiocarcinoma • Intrahepatic or extrahepatic infiltrative or irregular mass • Soft tissue growth within ductal lumen • Obstruction and dilatation of CBD and IHBD • Regional nodal and liver metastases Biliary Parasitic Infestation • Most common infestation: Ascaris, Clonorchis • Parallel echogenic tubular structures with sonolucent center within bile duct • Active movement of parasite • Lack of posterior acoustic shadowing Ampullary Mass • Hypodense mass in head of pancreas or ampulla • Ill-defined infiltrative margin • "Double duct" sign ○ Obstruction and dilatation of pancreatic duct and CBD • Vascular encasement • Contiguous organ invasion/regional nodal metastases may be seen Ascending Cholangitis • Clinical information suggesting biliary sepsis • Ductal wall thickening is hallmark in appropriate clinical setting • Usually due to superinfection of biliary obstruction by CBD stone, less likely from strictures • Can be associated with echogenic biliary sludge within ducts Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis • Historically in patients of East Asian demographic • Recurrent bouts of cholangitis • Strong association with parasites, such as Ascaris lumbricoides and Clonorchis sinensis • Pigmented stones &/or sludge within dilated intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts • Disproportionate increased dilation of central and extrahepatic bile ducts with stricturing and stenosis of peripheral ducts PATHOLOGY General Features • Etiology ○ Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation of stones within bile ducts, precipitated by bile stasis and infection ○ Secondary choledocholithiasis: Gallstones migrate into CBD, most common • Associated abnormalities ○ Gallstones – 5-20% of patients with gallstones will have choledocholithiasis at time of cholecystectomy ○ Dilated ducts CLINICAL ISSUES Presentation • Most common signs/symptoms ○ RUQ pain, pruritus, jaundice ○ May be asymptomatic • Other signs/symptoms ○ May present with complication: Acute cholangitis, acute pancreatitis • Clinical profile ○ "Fat, fertile, 40, female": Overweight, middle-aged female with history of acute or intermittent RUQ pain and jaundice • Lab data ○ Increased alkaline phosphatase and direct bilirubin Demographics • Age ○ Usually adults; can be seen in any age group • Gender ○ F > M Natural History & Prognosis • Small stones may pass spontaneously without causing any symptoms • Complications: Cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, pancreatitis, secondary biliary cirrhosis Treatment • ERCP: Preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative • Intraoperative common bile duct exploration: Open versus laparoscopic • Other lithotripsy: Extracorporeal shock wave, electrohydraulic, laser DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST Consider • Rule out other causes of "CBD obstruction" Image Interpretation Pearls • Echogenic filling defects casting posterior acoustic shadowing associated with dilatation of CBD/intrahepatic bile ducts SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Costi R et al: Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 20(37):13382-401, 2014 2. Stinton LM et al: Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 6(2):172-87, 2012 3. O'Connor OJ et al: Imaging of biliary tract disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 197(4):W551-8, 2011 4. Yeh BM et al: MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics. 29(6):1669-88, 2009 5. Rubens DJ. Ultrasound imaging of the biliary tract. Ultrasound Clinics. 2(3):391–413, 2007 6. Caddy GR et al: Gallstone disease: Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20(6):1085-101, 2006 7. Freitas ML et al: Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol. 12(20):3162-7, 2006 8. Tazuma S: Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20(6):1075-83, 2006 9. Hanbidge AE et al: From the RSNA refresher courses: imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics. 24(4):1117-35, 2004
- Page 300 and 301: PART II SECTION 2 Biliary System In
- Page 302 and 303: Approach to Biliary Sonography hosp
- Page 304 and 305: Approach to Biliary Sonography (Lef
- Page 306 and 307: Approach to Biliary Sonography (Lef
- Page 308 and 309: Cholelithiasis TERMINOLOGY Synonyms
- Page 310 and 311: Cholelithiasis (Left) Longitudinal
- Page 312 and 313: Cholelithiasis (Left) Abdominal rad
- Page 314 and 315: Echogenic Bile TERMINOLOGY Synonyms
- Page 316 and 317: Echogenic Bile (Left) Transverse ul
- Page 318 and 319: Gallbladder Cholesterol Polyp TERMI
- Page 320 and 321: Gallbladder Cholesterol Polyp (Left
- Page 322 and 323: Acute Calculous Cholecystitis TERMI
- Page 324 and 325: Acute Calculous Cholecystitis (Left
- Page 326 and 327: Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis TERM
- Page 328 and 329: Acute Acalculous Cholecystitis (Lef
- Page 330 and 331: Chronic Cholecystitis TERMINOLOGY D
- Page 332 and 333: Xanthogranulomatous Cholecystitis T
- Page 334 and 335: Porcelain Gallbladder TERMINOLOGY A
- Page 336 and 337: Hyperplastic Cholecystosis (Adenomy
- Page 338 and 339: Hyperplastic Cholecystosis (Adenomy
- Page 340 and 341: Gallbladder Carcinoma TERMINOLOGY A
- Page 342 and 343: Gallbladder Carcinoma (Left) Sagitt
- Page 344 and 345: Biliary Ductal Dilatation IMAGING G
- Page 346 and 347: Choledochal Cyst TERMINOLOGY Synony
- Page 348 and 349: Choledochal Cyst (Left) Longitudina
- Page 352 and 353: Choledocholithiasis (Left) A single
- Page 354 and 355: Biliary Ductal Gas TERMINOLOGY Syno
- Page 356 and 357: Cholangiocarcinoma TERMINOLOGY Syno
- Page 358 and 359: Cholangiocarcinoma (Left) Ultrasoun
- Page 360 and 361: Ascending Cholangitis TERMINOLOGY S
- Page 362 and 363: Ascending Cholangitis (Left) Longit
- Page 364 and 365: Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis TERM
- Page 366 and 367: Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis (Lef
- Page 368 and 369: AIDS-Related Cholangiopathy TERMINO
- Page 370 and 371: PART II SECTION 3 Pancreas Introduc
- Page 372 and 373: Approach to Pancreatic Sonography C
- Page 374 and 375: Approach to Pancreatic Sonography (
- Page 376 and 377: Acute Pancreatitis TERMINOLOGY Abbr
- Page 378 and 379: Acute Pancreatitis (Left) Transvers
- Page 380 and 381: Pancreatic Pseudocyst TERMINOLOGY D
- Page 382 and 383: Pancreatic Pseudocyst (Left) Transv
- Page 384 and 385: Chronic Pancreatitis TERMINOLOGY Ab
- Page 386 and 387: Chronic Pancreatitis (Left) Transve
- Page 388 and 389: Mucinous Cystic Pancreatic Tumor TE
- Page 390 and 391: Mucinous Cystic Pancreatic Tumor (L
- Page 392 and 393: Serous Cystadenoma of Pancreas TERM
- Page 394 and 395: Serous Cystadenoma of Pancreas (Lef
- Page 396 and 397: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neop
- Page 398 and 399: Intraductal Papillary Mucinous Neop
Choledocholithiasis<br />
TERMINOLOGY<br />
Abbreviations<br />
• Cholangiolithiasis, hepatolithiasis, biliary calculi, common<br />
bile duct (CBD) stones<br />
Definitions<br />
• Choledocholithiasis: Extrahepatic ductal stones/calculi<br />
• Hepatolithiasis: Intrahepatic stones/calculi<br />
IMAGING<br />
General Features<br />
• Best diagnostic clue<br />
○ Echogenic focus within bile duct, casting posterior<br />
acoustic shadowing<br />
• Location<br />
○ Intrahepatic <strong>and</strong> extrahepatic bile ducts<br />
– More common in CBD<br />
• Size<br />
○ Variable<br />
• Morphology<br />
○ Classified into 2 main types based on origin<br />
– Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation within<br />
bile duct<br />
□ Calculi are composed predominantly of bilirubin (><br />
90% calcium bilirubinate composition)<br />
□ Brown pigment stones are associated with bacterial<br />
infections<br />
– Secondary choledocholithiasis (more common):<br />
Gallstone migration from gallbladder to bile ducts<br />
□ Calculi are composed primarily of cholesterol<br />
Ultrasonographic Findings<br />
• Grayscale ultrasound<br />
○ Appearance depends on site, size, <strong>and</strong> composition of<br />
stones<br />
○ Extrahepatic biliary stones<br />
– Most commonly seen within CBD<br />
□ Most often within lumen of periampullary<br />
region/distal portion of CBD<br />
– Classic appearance: Rounded echogenic lesion with<br />
posterior acoustic shadowing<br />
– Can be associated with extrahepatic <strong>and</strong> intrahepatic<br />
ductal dilatation<br />
○ Intrahepatic biliary stones<br />
– Majority appear as highly echogenic foci with<br />
posterior acoustic shadowing<br />
– Located in region of portal triads paralleling course of<br />
intrahepatic portal veins<br />
– Small (< 5 mm) or soft pigmented stones may not<br />
produce posterior shadowing<br />
– Larger stone may cause biliary obstruction with focal<br />
intrahepatic ductal dilatation<br />
– Duct is filled with stones, appears as linear echogenic<br />
structure with posterior acoustic shadowing<br />
○ 10% stones: No posterior acoustic shadow<br />
– Small size, soft, <strong>and</strong> porous composition<br />
○ CBD/intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (IHBD) based on<br />
stone size, degree, <strong>and</strong> duration of obstruction<br />
○ Transabdominal US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis<br />
reported between 20% <strong>and</strong> 78%, may be obscured<br />
distally by bowel gas<br />
○ Endoscopic US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis<br />
reported between 94% <strong>and</strong> 98%<br />
• Color Doppler<br />
○ Echogenic focus is avascular, may show "twinkling"<br />
artifact<br />
○ Aids definition of dilated biliary ducts against<br />
background intrahepatic parenchymal vessels<br />
Radiographic Findings<br />
• ERCP<br />
○ Radiolucent filling defects within intrahepatic ±<br />
extrahepatic bile ducts<br />
○ Potentially therapeutic: Portal for stone retrieval,<br />
sphincterotomy, or internal stent insertion<br />
○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 90-<br />
95%, considered "gold st<strong>and</strong>ard"<br />
• Intraoperative <strong>and</strong> postoperative (T tube) cholangiography<br />
○ Direct test for detection of CBD stones<br />
○ Meniscus of contrast material clearly outlines margins of<br />
stones<br />
CT Findings<br />
• NECT<br />
○ Attenuation of calculi varies from less than water<br />
density, through soft tissue, to dense calcification<br />
– Typically high-density filling defect within biliary duct<br />
○ Abrupt termination of CBD by obstructing stone<br />
○ CBD &/or IHBD dilatation<br />
– Varies depending on stone size, degree, <strong>and</strong> duration<br />
of obstruction<br />
○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 67-88%<br />
MR Findings<br />
• MRCP<br />
○ Bile: T2 hyperintense signal<br />
○ Ductal stones: T2 hypointense foci<br />
○ Calculi manifest as low intensity filling defects within<br />
increased signal intensity bile ducts<br />
○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 81-100%<br />
Imaging Recommendations<br />
• Best imaging tool<br />
○ US, MRCP<br />
• Protocol advice<br />
○ CBD stones are most commonly located in region of<br />
ampulla of Vater<br />
– High chance of being obscured by bowel gas<br />
○ Practical advice to optimize detection<br />
– Examine patient in different positions: Supine, left<br />
lateral oblique, sitting upright<br />
– Use firm probe pressure to collapse superficial bowel<br />
<strong>and</strong> its content<br />
– Perform detailed assessment of head region of<br />
pancreas<br />
○ Postcholecystectomy patients with persistent RUQ pain<br />
– Image after fasting <strong>and</strong> 45 min to 1 hr after fatty meal<br />
○ If gas obscures CBD; have patient drink 6-12 oz of water<br />
– Keep patient in right decubitus position for 2-3<br />
minutes <strong>and</strong> rescan in semierect position<br />
Diagnoses: Biliary System<br />
329