Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

09.07.2019 Views

Choledocholithiasis TERMINOLOGY Abbreviations • Cholangiolithiasis, hepatolithiasis, biliary calculi, common bile duct (CBD) stones Definitions • Choledocholithiasis: Extrahepatic ductal stones/calculi • Hepatolithiasis: Intrahepatic stones/calculi IMAGING General Features • Best diagnostic clue ○ Echogenic focus within bile duct, casting posterior acoustic shadowing • Location ○ Intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts – More common in CBD • Size ○ Variable • Morphology ○ Classified into 2 main types based on origin – Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation within bile duct □ Calculi are composed predominantly of bilirubin (> 90% calcium bilirubinate composition) □ Brown pigment stones are associated with bacterial infections – Secondary choledocholithiasis (more common): Gallstone migration from gallbladder to bile ducts □ Calculi are composed primarily of cholesterol Ultrasonographic Findings • Grayscale ultrasound ○ Appearance depends on site, size, and composition of stones ○ Extrahepatic biliary stones – Most commonly seen within CBD □ Most often within lumen of periampullary region/distal portion of CBD – Classic appearance: Rounded echogenic lesion with posterior acoustic shadowing – Can be associated with extrahepatic and intrahepatic ductal dilatation ○ Intrahepatic biliary stones – Majority appear as highly echogenic foci with posterior acoustic shadowing – Located in region of portal triads paralleling course of intrahepatic portal veins – Small (< 5 mm) or soft pigmented stones may not produce posterior shadowing – Larger stone may cause biliary obstruction with focal intrahepatic ductal dilatation – Duct is filled with stones, appears as linear echogenic structure with posterior acoustic shadowing ○ 10% stones: No posterior acoustic shadow – Small size, soft, and porous composition ○ CBD/intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (IHBD) based on stone size, degree, and duration of obstruction ○ Transabdominal US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 20% and 78%, may be obscured distally by bowel gas ○ Endoscopic US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 94% and 98% • Color Doppler ○ Echogenic focus is avascular, may show "twinkling" artifact ○ Aids definition of dilated biliary ducts against background intrahepatic parenchymal vessels Radiographic Findings • ERCP ○ Radiolucent filling defects within intrahepatic ± extrahepatic bile ducts ○ Potentially therapeutic: Portal for stone retrieval, sphincterotomy, or internal stent insertion ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 90- 95%, considered "gold standard" • Intraoperative and postoperative (T tube) cholangiography ○ Direct test for detection of CBD stones ○ Meniscus of contrast material clearly outlines margins of stones CT Findings • NECT ○ Attenuation of calculi varies from less than water density, through soft tissue, to dense calcification – Typically high-density filling defect within biliary duct ○ Abrupt termination of CBD by obstructing stone ○ CBD &/or IHBD dilatation – Varies depending on stone size, degree, and duration of obstruction ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 67-88% MR Findings • MRCP ○ Bile: T2 hyperintense signal ○ Ductal stones: T2 hypointense foci ○ Calculi manifest as low intensity filling defects within increased signal intensity bile ducts ○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 81-100% Imaging Recommendations • Best imaging tool ○ US, MRCP • Protocol advice ○ CBD stones are most commonly located in region of ampulla of Vater – High chance of being obscured by bowel gas ○ Practical advice to optimize detection – Examine patient in different positions: Supine, left lateral oblique, sitting upright – Use firm probe pressure to collapse superficial bowel and its content – Perform detailed assessment of head region of pancreas ○ Postcholecystectomy patients with persistent RUQ pain – Image after fasting and 45 min to 1 hr after fatty meal ○ If gas obscures CBD; have patient drink 6-12 oz of water – Keep patient in right decubitus position for 2-3 minutes and rescan in semierect position Diagnoses: Biliary System 329

Choledocholithiasis 330 Diagnoses: Biliary System DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS Cholangiocarcinoma • Intrahepatic or extrahepatic infiltrative or irregular mass • Soft tissue growth within ductal lumen • Obstruction and dilatation of CBD and IHBD • Regional nodal and liver metastases Biliary Parasitic Infestation • Most common infestation: Ascaris, Clonorchis • Parallel echogenic tubular structures with sonolucent center within bile duct • Active movement of parasite • Lack of posterior acoustic shadowing Ampullary Mass • Hypodense mass in head of pancreas or ampulla • Ill-defined infiltrative margin • "Double duct" sign ○ Obstruction and dilatation of pancreatic duct and CBD • Vascular encasement • Contiguous organ invasion/regional nodal metastases may be seen Ascending Cholangitis • Clinical information suggesting biliary sepsis • Ductal wall thickening is hallmark in appropriate clinical setting • Usually due to superinfection of biliary obstruction by CBD stone, less likely from strictures • Can be associated with echogenic biliary sludge within ducts Recurrent Pyogenic Cholangitis • Historically in patients of East Asian demographic • Recurrent bouts of cholangitis • Strong association with parasites, such as Ascaris lumbricoides and Clonorchis sinensis • Pigmented stones &/or sludge within dilated intrahepatic and extrahepatic bile ducts • Disproportionate increased dilation of central and extrahepatic bile ducts with stricturing and stenosis of peripheral ducts PATHOLOGY General Features • Etiology ○ Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation of stones within bile ducts, precipitated by bile stasis and infection ○ Secondary choledocholithiasis: Gallstones migrate into CBD, most common • Associated abnormalities ○ Gallstones – 5-20% of patients with gallstones will have choledocholithiasis at time of cholecystectomy ○ Dilated ducts CLINICAL ISSUES Presentation • Most common signs/symptoms ○ RUQ pain, pruritus, jaundice ○ May be asymptomatic • Other signs/symptoms ○ May present with complication: Acute cholangitis, acute pancreatitis • Clinical profile ○ "Fat, fertile, 40, female": Overweight, middle-aged female with history of acute or intermittent RUQ pain and jaundice • Lab data ○ Increased alkaline phosphatase and direct bilirubin Demographics • Age ○ Usually adults; can be seen in any age group • Gender ○ F > M Natural History & Prognosis • Small stones may pass spontaneously without causing any symptoms • Complications: Cholangitis, obstructive jaundice, pancreatitis, secondary biliary cirrhosis Treatment • ERCP: Preoperative, intraoperative, or postoperative • Intraoperative common bile duct exploration: Open versus laparoscopic • Other lithotripsy: Extracorporeal shock wave, electrohydraulic, laser DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST Consider • Rule out other causes of "CBD obstruction" Image Interpretation Pearls • Echogenic filling defects casting posterior acoustic shadowing associated with dilatation of CBD/intrahepatic bile ducts SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Costi R et al: Diagnosis and management of choledocholithiasis in the golden age of imaging, endoscopy and laparoscopy. World J Gastroenterol. 20(37):13382-401, 2014 2. Stinton LM et al: Epidemiology of gallbladder disease: cholelithiasis and cancer. Gut Liver. 6(2):172-87, 2012 3. O'Connor OJ et al: Imaging of biliary tract disease. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 197(4):W551-8, 2011 4. Yeh BM et al: MR imaging and CT of the biliary tract. Radiographics. 29(6):1669-88, 2009 5. Rubens DJ. Ultrasound imaging of the biliary tract. Ultrasound Clinics. 2(3):391–413, 2007 6. Caddy GR et al: Gallstone disease: Symptoms, diagnosis and endoscopic management of common bile duct stones. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20(6):1085-101, 2006 7. Freitas ML et al: Choledocholithiasis: evolving standards for diagnosis and management. World J Gastroenterol. 12(20):3162-7, 2006 8. Tazuma S: Gallstone disease: Epidemiology, pathogenesis, and classification of biliary stones (common bile duct and intrahepatic). Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol. 20(6):1075-83, 2006 9. Hanbidge AE et al: From the RSNA refresher courses: imaging evaluation for acute pain in the right upper quadrant. Radiographics. 24(4):1117-35, 2004

Choledocholithiasis<br />

TERMINOLOGY<br />

Abbreviations<br />

• Cholangiolithiasis, hepatolithiasis, biliary calculi, common<br />

bile duct (CBD) stones<br />

Definitions<br />

• Choledocholithiasis: Extrahepatic ductal stones/calculi<br />

• Hepatolithiasis: Intrahepatic stones/calculi<br />

IMAGING<br />

General Features<br />

• Best diagnostic clue<br />

○ Echogenic focus within bile duct, casting posterior<br />

acoustic shadowing<br />

• Location<br />

○ Intrahepatic <strong>and</strong> extrahepatic bile ducts<br />

– More common in CBD<br />

• Size<br />

○ Variable<br />

• Morphology<br />

○ Classified into 2 main types based on origin<br />

– Primary choledocholithiasis: De novo formation within<br />

bile duct<br />

□ Calculi are composed predominantly of bilirubin (><br />

90% calcium bilirubinate composition)<br />

□ Brown pigment stones are associated with bacterial<br />

infections<br />

– Secondary choledocholithiasis (more common):<br />

Gallstone migration from gallbladder to bile ducts<br />

□ Calculi are composed primarily of cholesterol<br />

Ultrasonographic Findings<br />

• Grayscale ultrasound<br />

○ Appearance depends on site, size, <strong>and</strong> composition of<br />

stones<br />

○ Extrahepatic biliary stones<br />

– Most commonly seen within CBD<br />

□ Most often within lumen of periampullary<br />

region/distal portion of CBD<br />

– Classic appearance: Rounded echogenic lesion with<br />

posterior acoustic shadowing<br />

– Can be associated with extrahepatic <strong>and</strong> intrahepatic<br />

ductal dilatation<br />

○ Intrahepatic biliary stones<br />

– Majority appear as highly echogenic foci with<br />

posterior acoustic shadowing<br />

– Located in region of portal triads paralleling course of<br />

intrahepatic portal veins<br />

– Small (< 5 mm) or soft pigmented stones may not<br />

produce posterior shadowing<br />

– Larger stone may cause biliary obstruction with focal<br />

intrahepatic ductal dilatation<br />

– Duct is filled with stones, appears as linear echogenic<br />

structure with posterior acoustic shadowing<br />

○ 10% stones: No posterior acoustic shadow<br />

– Small size, soft, <strong>and</strong> porous composition<br />

○ CBD/intrahepatic bile duct dilatation (IHBD) based on<br />

stone size, degree, <strong>and</strong> duration of obstruction<br />

○ Transabdominal US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis<br />

reported between 20% <strong>and</strong> 78%, may be obscured<br />

distally by bowel gas<br />

○ Endoscopic US sensitivity for choledocholithiasis<br />

reported between 94% <strong>and</strong> 98%<br />

• Color Doppler<br />

○ Echogenic focus is avascular, may show "twinkling"<br />

artifact<br />

○ Aids definition of dilated biliary ducts against<br />

background intrahepatic parenchymal vessels<br />

Radiographic Findings<br />

• ERCP<br />

○ Radiolucent filling defects within intrahepatic ±<br />

extrahepatic bile ducts<br />

○ Potentially therapeutic: Portal for stone retrieval,<br />

sphincterotomy, or internal stent insertion<br />

○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis reported between 90-<br />

95%, considered "gold st<strong>and</strong>ard"<br />

• Intraoperative <strong>and</strong> postoperative (T tube) cholangiography<br />

○ Direct test for detection of CBD stones<br />

○ Meniscus of contrast material clearly outlines margins of<br />

stones<br />

CT Findings<br />

• NECT<br />

○ Attenuation of calculi varies from less than water<br />

density, through soft tissue, to dense calcification<br />

– Typically high-density filling defect within biliary duct<br />

○ Abrupt termination of CBD by obstructing stone<br />

○ CBD &/or IHBD dilatation<br />

– Varies depending on stone size, degree, <strong>and</strong> duration<br />

of obstruction<br />

○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 67-88%<br />

MR Findings<br />

• MRCP<br />

○ Bile: T2 hyperintense signal<br />

○ Ductal stones: T2 hypointense foci<br />

○ Calculi manifest as low intensity filling defects within<br />

increased signal intensity bile ducts<br />

○ Sensitivity for choledocholithiasis between 81-100%<br />

Imaging Recommendations<br />

• Best imaging tool<br />

○ US, MRCP<br />

• Protocol advice<br />

○ CBD stones are most commonly located in region of<br />

ampulla of Vater<br />

– High chance of being obscured by bowel gas<br />

○ Practical advice to optimize detection<br />

– Examine patient in different positions: Supine, left<br />

lateral oblique, sitting upright<br />

– Use firm probe pressure to collapse superficial bowel<br />

<strong>and</strong> its content<br />

– Perform detailed assessment of head region of<br />

pancreas<br />

○ Postcholecystectomy patients with persistent RUQ pain<br />

– Image after fasting <strong>and</strong> 45 min to 1 hr after fatty meal<br />

○ If gas obscures CBD; have patient drink 6-12 oz of water<br />

– Keep patient in right decubitus position for 2-3<br />

minutes <strong>and</strong> rescan in semierect position<br />

Diagnoses: Biliary System<br />

329

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!