Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

09.07.2019 Views

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) TERMINOLOGY Abbreviations • Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS) Definitions • Shunt between portal vein (PV) and hepatic vein (HV) created typically with balloon-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent graft • Shunt dysfunction ○ Reduction > 50% of shunt lumen ○ Portosystemic gradient > 12-15 mmHg ○ Complete occlusion of shunt IMAGING General Features • Location ○ Most common route: Right PV → right HV • Size ○ 10-12 mm in diameter • Morphology ○ Typically follows curved course through hepatic parenchyma ○ Portal end in right portal vein near main PV bifurcation ○ Hepatic end located near junction of HV/inferior vena cava (IVC) Ultrasonographic Findings • Grayscale ultrasound ○ Echogenic stent easily seen ○ Stent typically curved but should not be kinked ○ Hepatic and portal ends "squarely" within veins (best seen on grayscale US) • Pulsed Doppler ○ PV, shunt malfunction – Peak velocity < 35 cm/sec – Change in direction of flow in left portal branch (i.e., change from hepatofugal to hepatopetal) ○ Within shunt, malfunction – Shunt velocity < 90 cm/sec or > 200 cm/sec at any point – Temporal change in velocity ≥ 50 cm/sec compared to prior studies – Focal severe turbulence or elevated velocity can suggest stenosis – Absence of flow: Occlusion □ Always confirm angiographically – Loss of pulsatility or respiratory variation (less specific finding) • Color Doppler ○ Within shunt, malfunction – Visible stenosis, focal or diffuse – Focal aliasing indicates high velocity and suggests stenosis – Absence of flow: Occlusion □ Check with spectral Doppler (more sensitive); confirm angiographically • Goal of US: Detection of stenosis before shunt occludes or symptoms recur Angiographic Findings • Shunt venography (gold standard) ○ Direct catheterization of shunt via peripheral vein approach ○ Detection and quantification of shunt patency or degree of stenosis ○ Simultaneous measurement of portosystemic gradient ○ Intervention if necessary ○ Limitation: Invasive nature Other Modality Findings • CTA, MRA ○ Anatomic depiction of stenosis, occlusion, and collateralization ○ Contrast enhancement essential for CTA, generally required for MRA ○ Obtain a global view Imaging Recommendations • Best imaging tool ○ US is primary TIPS surveillance tool ○ CTA/MRA indicated if US technically compromised or equivocal • Protocol advice ○ Post-TIPS assessment (grayscale, color Doppler, spectral Doppler) – Stent configuration/position – Patency and flow direction in PV and its branches □ Measure velocity mid-PV (not adjacent to shunt) – Assess shunt with color Doppler □ Measure Doppler waveforms/peak velocities: Proximal, mid, distal shunt □ Compare findings with prior results (velocities ideally within 50 cm/sec of prior measurement) – Presence of stenosis □ If present, document peak stenosis velocity, usually at point of maximum turbulence – Patency, flow direction, Doppler waveforms in HV – Always check for coexisting hepatic masses, especially in cirrhotic patients – Evaluate presence/volume of ascites and pleural fluid DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS PV Occlusion • Predisposing factors ○ Hypercoagulable states, pancreatitis, tumor invasion, dehydration, trauma, cirrhosis • Acute ○ CECT may demonstrate transient hepatic attenuation difference (THAD) with affected lobe or segment on arterial phase ○ If main PV acutely thrombotic, central perihepatic low attenuation on arterial phase • Chronic ○ Cavernous transformation ○ Innumerable periportal collaterals along hepatoduodenal ligament ○ "Cavernoma," i.e., mass-like tangle of collateral veins in porta hepatis Diagnoses: Liver http://radiologyebook.com/ 261

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS) 262 Diagnoses: Liver HV Occlusion • Predisposing factors ○ Hypercoagulable states, Budd-Chiari syndrome, myeloproliferative states, birth control pills, tumor invasion (especially hepatocellular carcinoma) • CECT ○ Arterial phase: Normal enhancing caudate lobe, mottled and reticular enhancement in liver periphery – Due to congestion and centrilobular necrosis ○ Venous phase: "Flip-flop" with lower attenuation of caudate lobe and increased density in liver periphery ○ Visualization of thrombi in HV and peridiaphragmatic collateral veins IVC Occlusion • Etiologies ○ Tumor infiltration, hepatocellular carcinoma most common; rarely metastases ○ Congenital web or band ○ Angiosarcoma of IVC PATHOLOGY General Features • Etiology ○ Stenosis usually secondary to intimal fibroplasia within HV – Biliary leak or contamination of shunt may induce intimal hyperplasia • Associated abnormalities ○ Hepatic encephalopathy as portal venous flow bypasses liver Microscopic Features • Intimal hyperplasia within areas of TIPS stenosis CLINICAL ISSUES Presentation • Most common signs/symptoms ○ TIPS malfunction – Signs of worsening portal hypertension with increasing ascites – Variceal hemorrhage Demographics • Epidemiology ○ Maintaining TIPS shunt patency is major problem – Primary patency (no intervention): 1 year = 38-84% – Secondary (assisted) patency: 1 year = 96-100% Natural History & Prognosis • Causes of TIPS failure ○ Technical problems: Malposition, kinks, incomplete deployment, hepatic perforation with hemoperitoneum, or bile leak ○ Venous trauma during stent insertion: Usually HV progresses to fibrosis/stenosis, may result in acute occlusion of PV ○ Neointimal hyperplasia (ameliorated by covered stents) ○ Thrombosis: Coagulopathy, intercurrent illness due to above problems ○ Hepatic arterial injury and arteriovenous fistula http://radiologyebook.com/ ○ Gallbladder injury • Guarded prognosis ○ Maintaining shunt patency ○ Inevitable liver disease progression ○ High risk of cirrhosis-related hepatocellular carcinoma ○ 7-45% 30-day mortality Indications for TIPS • Variceal bleeding refractory to sclerosis/banding • Refractory ascites • Hepatic hydrothorax • Budd-Chiari syndrome • Bridge to liver transplantation Relative Contraindications for TIPS • Hepatobiliary or pancreatic malignancy • Portal venous system thrombosis • Polycystic liver disease • Biliary obstruction • Infectious cholangitis DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST Consider • TIPS malfunction on Doppler US ○ If shunt velocity < 90 cm/sec or > 200 cm/sec or PV velocity < 35 cm/sec • Low flow difficult to detect with US ○ Confirm occlusion angiographically (CTA, MRA, shunt venography) SELECTED REFERENCES 1. Engstrom BI et al: Covered transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts: accuracy of ultrasound in detecting shunt malfunction. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 200(4):904-8, 2013 2. Sajja KC et al: Long-term follow-up of TIPS created with expanded polytetrafluoroethylene covered stents. Dig Dis Sci. 58(7):2100-6, 2013 3. Wu Q et al: Transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt using the FLUENCY expanded polytetrafluoroethylene-covered stent. Exp Ther Med. 5(1):263-266, 2013 4. Gazzera C et al: Fifteen years' experience with transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) using bare stents: retrospective review of clinical and technical aspects. Radiol Med. 114(1):83-94, 2009 5. Kim MJ et al: Technical essentials of hepatic Doppler sonography. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 38(2):53-60, 2009 6. Bauer J et al: The role of TIPS for portal vein patency in liver transplant patients with portal vein thrombosis. Liver Transpl. 12(10):1544-51, 2006 7. Harrod-Kim P et al: Predictors of early mortality after transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt creation for the treatment of refractory ascites. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 17(10):1605-10, 2006 8. Benito A et al: Doppler ultrasound for TIPS: does it work? Abdom Imaging. 29(1):45-52, 2004 9. Middleton WD et al: Doppler evaluation of transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Ultrasound Q. 19(2):56-70; quiz 108 - 10, 2003 10. Bodner G et al: Color and pulsed Doppler ultrasound findings in normally functioning transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunts. Eur J Ultrasound. 12(2):131-6, 2000 11. Zizka J et al: Value of Doppler sonography in revealing transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt malfunction: a 5-year experience in 216 patients. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 175(1):141-8, 2000

Transjugular Intrahepatic Portosystemic Shunt (TIPS)<br />

TERMINOLOGY<br />

Abbreviations<br />

• Transjugular intrahepatic portasystemic shunt (TIPS)<br />

Definitions<br />

• Shunt between portal vein (PV) <strong>and</strong> hepatic vein (HV)<br />

created typically with balloon-exp<strong>and</strong>able<br />

polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-covered stent graft<br />

• Shunt dysfunction<br />

○ Reduction > 50% of shunt lumen<br />

○ Portosystemic gradient > 12-15 mmHg<br />

○ Complete occlusion of shunt<br />

IMAGING<br />

General Features<br />

• Location<br />

○ Most common route: Right PV → right HV <br />

• Size<br />

○ 10-12 mm in diameter<br />

• Morphology<br />

○ Typically follows curved course through hepatic<br />

parenchyma<br />

○ Portal end in right portal vein near main PV bifurcation<br />

○ Hepatic end located near junction of HV/inferior vena<br />

cava (IVC)<br />

Ultrasonographic Findings<br />

• Grayscale ultrasound<br />

○ Echogenic stent easily seen<br />

○ Stent typically curved but should not be kinked<br />

○ Hepatic <strong>and</strong> portal ends "squarely" within veins (best<br />

seen on grayscale US)<br />

• Pulsed Doppler<br />

○ PV, shunt malfunction<br />

– Peak velocity < 35 cm/sec<br />

– Change in direction of flow in left portal branch (i.e.,<br />

change from hepatofugal to hepatopetal)<br />

○ Within shunt, malfunction<br />

– Shunt velocity < 90 cm/sec or > 200 cm/sec at any<br />

point<br />

– Temporal change in velocity ≥ 50 cm/sec compared to<br />

prior studies<br />

– Focal severe turbulence or elevated velocity can<br />

suggest stenosis<br />

– Absence of flow: Occlusion<br />

□ Always confirm angiographically<br />

– Loss of pulsatility or respiratory variation (less specific<br />

finding)<br />

• Color Doppler<br />

○ Within shunt, malfunction<br />

– Visible stenosis, focal or diffuse<br />

– Focal aliasing indicates high velocity <strong>and</strong> suggests<br />

stenosis<br />

– Absence of flow: Occlusion<br />

□ Check with spectral Doppler (more sensitive);<br />

confirm angiographically<br />

• Goal of US: Detection of stenosis before shunt occludes or<br />

symptoms recur<br />

Angiographic Findings<br />

• Shunt venography (gold st<strong>and</strong>ard)<br />

○ Direct catheterization of shunt via peripheral vein<br />

approach<br />

○ Detection <strong>and</strong> quantification of shunt patency or degree<br />

of stenosis<br />

○ Simultaneous measurement of portosystemic gradient<br />

○ Intervention if necessary<br />

○ Limitation: Invasive nature<br />

Other Modality Findings<br />

• CTA, MRA<br />

○ Anatomic depiction of stenosis, occlusion, <strong>and</strong><br />

collateralization<br />

○ Contrast enhancement essential for CTA, generally<br />

required for MRA<br />

○ Obtain a global view<br />

Imaging Recommendations<br />

• Best imaging tool<br />

○ US is primary TIPS surveillance tool<br />

○ CTA/MRA indicated if US technically compromised or<br />

equivocal<br />

• Protocol advice<br />

○ Post-TIPS assessment (grayscale, color Doppler, spectral<br />

Doppler)<br />

– Stent configuration/position<br />

– Patency <strong>and</strong> flow direction in PV <strong>and</strong> its branches<br />

□ Measure velocity mid-PV (not adjacent to shunt)<br />

– Assess shunt with color Doppler<br />

□ Measure Doppler waveforms/peak velocities:<br />

Proximal, mid, distal shunt<br />

□ Compare findings with prior results (velocities<br />

ideally within 50 cm/sec of prior measurement)<br />

– Presence of stenosis<br />

□ If present, document peak stenosis velocity, usually<br />

at point of maximum turbulence<br />

– Patency, flow direction, Doppler waveforms in HV<br />

– Always check for coexisting hepatic masses, especially<br />

in cirrhotic patients<br />

– Evaluate presence/volume of ascites <strong>and</strong> pleural fluid<br />

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS<br />

PV Occlusion<br />

• Predisposing factors<br />

○ Hypercoagulable states, pancreatitis, tumor invasion,<br />

dehydration, trauma, cirrhosis<br />

• Acute<br />

○ CECT may demonstrate transient hepatic attenuation<br />

difference (THAD) with affected lobe or segment on<br />

arterial phase<br />

○ If main PV acutely thrombotic, central perihepatic low<br />

attenuation on arterial phase<br />

• Chronic<br />

○ Cavernous transformation<br />

○ Innumerable periportal collaterals along<br />

hepatoduodenal ligament<br />

○ "Cavernoma," i.e., mass-like tangle of collateral veins in<br />

porta hepatis<br />

Diagnoses: Liver<br />

http://radiologyebook.com/<br />

261

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!