09.07.2019 Views

Diagnostic Ultrasound - Abdomen and Pelvis

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Hepatic Adenoma<br />

244<br />

Diagnoses: Liver<br />

• Vascular, biliary, nodal invasion may be present<br />

Metastases<br />

• Usually multiple <strong>and</strong> look for primary tumors<br />

PATHOLOGY<br />

General Features<br />

• Etiology<br />

○ ↑ risk in oral contraceptives <strong>and</strong> anabolic steroid users<br />

○ Pregnancy<br />

– Increased tumor growth rate <strong>and</strong> tumor rupture<br />

○ Types I <strong>and</strong> III glycogen storage disease<br />

– Multiple adenomas: 60%<br />

○ Diabetes mellitus<br />

○ Klinefelter syndrome<br />

○ Obesity<br />

• High incidence of<br />

○ Hemorrhage, necrosis, <strong>and</strong> fatty change<br />

Staging, Grading, & Classification<br />

• 4 molecular/pathological subtypes: Help determine<br />

prognosis <strong>and</strong> management<br />

○ β-catenin-mutated HCA (10-15%): High risk of<br />

malignant transformation<br />

– Occurs more frequently in men<br />

– Steatosis is rare, inflammation is absent<br />

– Difficult to differentiate from well-differentiated HCC<br />

on pathology<br />

○ Inflammatory HCA (50%): 10% risk of malignant<br />

transformation<br />

– Focal steatosis may be present<br />

– Previously classified as telangiectatic FNH<br />

○ Hepatocyte nuclear factor 1α-inactivated HCA (30-<br />

35%)<br />

– Steatosis characteristically present<br />

– Absence of inflammatory infiltrate<br />

○ Unclassified (< 10%)<br />

Gross Pathologic & Surgical Features<br />

• Well-circumscribed mass on external surface of liver<br />

• Soft, pale, or yellow tan<br />

• Large areas of hemorrhage or infarction<br />

• "Pseudocapsule" <strong>and</strong> occasional "pseudopods"<br />

CLINICAL ISSUES<br />

Presentation<br />

• Most common signs/symptoms<br />

○ RUQ pain (40%): Due to hemorrhage<br />

○ Asymptomatic (20%)<br />

• Clinical profile<br />

○ Usually normal liver function tests<br />

Demographics<br />

• Age<br />

○ Young women of childbearing age group<br />

• Gender<br />

○ 98% seen in females (M:F = 1:10)<br />

○ Males on anabolic steroids or with glycogen storage<br />

disease<br />

• Epidemiology<br />

http://radiologyebook.com/<br />

○ Estimated incidence in oral contraceptive users<br />

– 4 adenomas per 100,000 users<br />

○ Multiple adenomas in glycogen storage disease<br />

Natural History & Prognosis<br />

• Complications<br />

○ Hemorrhage: Intrahepatic or intraperitoneal (40%)<br />

○ Rupture: Increased risk in pregnancy<br />

○ Malignant transformation<br />

– 4.3% risk in adenomas larger than 5 cm<br />

– High risk in β-catenin subtype<br />

• Prognosis<br />

○ Usually good<br />

– After discontinuation of oral contraceptives<br />

– After surgical resection of large/symptomatic<br />

○ Poor<br />

– Intraperitoneal rupture<br />

– Rupture during pregnancy<br />

– Adenomatosis (> 10 adenomas)<br />

– Malignant transformation<br />

Treatment<br />

• Adenoma < 6 cm<br />

○ Observation <strong>and</strong> discontinue oral contraceptives<br />

• Adenoma > 6 cm <strong>and</strong> near surface<br />

○ Surgical resection<br />

• β-catenin mutated subtype<br />

○ Resection due to increased risk of malignant<br />

transformation<br />

• Avoid pregnancy due to increased risk of rupture<br />

DIAGNOSTIC CHECKLIST<br />

Consider<br />

• Rule out other benign <strong>and</strong> malignant liver tumors, which<br />

have similar imaging features, particularly HCC or FNH<br />

• Percutaneous biopsy is associated with high risk of bleeding<br />

• Check for history of oral contraceptives <strong>and</strong> glycogen<br />

storage disease (in case of multiple adenomas)<br />

SELECTED REFERENCES<br />

1. Khanna M et al: Current updates on the molecular genetics <strong>and</strong> magnetic<br />

resonance imaging of focal nodular hyperplasia <strong>and</strong> hepatocellular<br />

adenoma. Insights Imaging. ePub, 2015<br />

2. Dhingra S et al: Update on the new classification of hepatic adenomas:<br />

clinical, molecular, <strong>and</strong> pathologic characteristics. Arch Pathol Lab Med.<br />

138(8):1090-7, 2014<br />

3. Frulio N et al: Evaluation of liver tumors using acoustic radiation force<br />

impulse elastography <strong>and</strong> correlation with histologic data. J <strong>Ultrasound</strong><br />

Med. 32(1):121-30, 2013<br />

4. Bieze M et al: <strong>Diagnostic</strong> accuracy of MRI in differentiating hepatocellular<br />

adenoma from focal nodular hyperplasia: prospective study of the additional<br />

value of gadoxetate disodium. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 199(1):26-34, 2012<br />

5. Purysko AS et al: Characteristics <strong>and</strong> distinguishing features of<br />

hepatocellular adenoma <strong>and</strong> focal nodular hyperplasia on gadoxetate<br />

disodium-enhanced MRI. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 198(1):115-23, 2012<br />

6. Kamaya A et al: Hypervascular liver lesions. Semin <strong>Ultrasound</strong> CT MR.<br />

30(5):387-407, 2009

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!