14.05.2019 Views

Angelus News | May 17, 2019 | Vol. 4 No. 18

A priest waits while sitting in a confessional box in the Cathedral of Barcelona. A new bill making its way through the California legislature would seek to force priests to break divine law in order to follow civil law. But would requiring priests to break the seal of confession in cases of alleged child sexual abuse really prevent abuse? On page 10, editor Pablo Kay weighs both sides of the debate surrounding SB 360 and looks at how similar legislation has fared in other places. On page 13, contributing editor Mike Aquilina recounts the history of confessional secrecy as a key part of the Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation in the Catholic faith. And on page 3, Archbishop José H. Gomez writes why the bill is a “mortal threat to the religious freedom of every Catholic.”

A priest waits while sitting in a confessional box in the Cathedral of Barcelona. A new bill making its way through the California legislature would seek to force priests to break divine law in order to follow civil law. But would requiring priests to break the seal of confession in cases of alleged child sexual abuse really prevent abuse? On page 10, editor Pablo Kay weighs both sides of the debate surrounding SB 360 and looks at how similar legislation has fared in other places. On page 13, contributing editor Mike Aquilina recounts the history of confessional secrecy as a key part of the Sacrament of Penance and Reconciliation in the Catholic faith. And on page 3, Archbishop José H. Gomez writes why the bill is a “mortal threat to the religious freedom of every Catholic.”

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

often in preposterous ways.<br />

Take Marcion — please. A Roman<br />

shipping magnate born about 80 years<br />

after Christ, Marcion was a generous<br />

Church member and contributor —<br />

until the Church asked him to leave.<br />

In a nutshell (key word: nut), Marcion<br />

believed that creation, including<br />

the human body, was evil; that an<br />

unknown “stranger” God existed — a<br />

good God — who was mightier than<br />

the creator God; that Jesus Christ<br />

didn’t have a real body but rather<br />

an illusory “magic mist”; and that<br />

our bodies would not be resurrected,<br />

because, well, they were evil.<br />

Marcion’s most famous work,<br />

“Antitheses,” attempted to prove<br />

that the God of the Jews could<br />

not possibly have been the God of<br />

Jesus. The errors of his ways were<br />

not funny to Marcion’s critics, but<br />

he stood by his crazy convictions<br />

and, astonishingly, was siphoning<br />

a troubling number of converts<br />

from the Church.<br />

The Church Fathers objected.<br />

And today, we have Marcion to<br />

thank for a necessary and immense<br />

contribution to Catholic<br />

doctrine. In order to argue against<br />

him, the Fathers had to take a<br />

deep breath and decide exactly<br />

how the Old Testament was related<br />

to the New: how the God of<br />

Abraham was the God of Jesus.<br />

Or consider Arius, after whom<br />

the Arian heresy is named. He<br />

taught that the Son was subordinate<br />

to the Father, created by the<br />

Father, and thus not eternal as the<br />

Father is.<br />

“What was so shocking about<br />

Arius’ teachings,” writes Aquilina,<br />

“was that they went against the<br />

traditional practice of the Church —<br />

never mind the doctrine. Christians<br />

worship Christ as God. They baptize<br />

in the name of the Father, Son, and<br />

Holy Spirit.” Arius’ interpretation<br />

“denies and defies” all that — and<br />

yet he, too, was enticing people away<br />

from the Church.<br />

Both the Church and the political<br />

arena were in chaos at the time.<br />

“The Eastern emperor, Licinius, was<br />

becoming increasingly intolerant of<br />

Christians, and the Western emperor,<br />

Constantine [a Christian], was<br />

becoming increasingly intolerant of<br />

Licinius,” writes Aquilina.<br />

“Eventually, open war broke out<br />

between them — a war that Constantine<br />

easily won. <strong>No</strong>w there was just<br />

one emperor for the whole Roman<br />

Empire, and that emperor was a<br />

Christian.”<br />

But as Constantine quickly learned,<br />

all was not well. The miasma of<br />

Arianism was spreading rapidly. He<br />

took decisive action and, in A.D. 325,<br />

“Portret van Nestorius,” by Romeyn de Hooghe, 1688.<br />

called all the bishops of the world —<br />

about 250 of them — to a meeting at<br />

Nicaea.<br />

From that momentous gathering<br />

issued the Nicene Creed, and 1,800<br />

years later, all around the world, 2 billion<br />

Christians still repeat the words:<br />

“God from God, Light from Light,<br />

true God from true God, begotten,<br />

not made, consubstantial with the<br />

Father.” Thank you, Arius.<br />

And finally, consider Nestorius,<br />

archbishop of Constantinople. On his<br />

very first day in office, he offended the<br />

WIKIMEDIA COMMONS<br />

emperor’s sister, who had consecrated<br />

her virginity to Christ and the Blessed<br />

Virgin Mary and “was the one who<br />

really ran things in Constantinople.”<br />

Next, Nestorius ordered the demolishing<br />

of Constantinople’s lone —<br />

and semi-officially tolerated — Arian<br />

chapel. To thwart Nestorius, the Arian<br />

congregation burned down their<br />

chapel before it could be torn down.<br />

The fire spread. Nestorius had been in<br />

office for five days.<br />

He went after monks, who were<br />

too independent. He went after<br />

women, who were too visible. And<br />

finally, he did himself in by insisting<br />

that technically the proper<br />

name for Mary was not “Mother of<br />

God” but “Mother of the Christ.”<br />

Aquilina writes: “The problem<br />

with most people, Nestorius<br />

seemed to believe, was that they<br />

didn’t choose their terms carefully<br />

enough. … The problem with<br />

Nestorius, thought practically<br />

everybody else in Constantinople,<br />

was that he had just said Mary<br />

wasn’t the Mother of God.<br />

“The people of the city instantly<br />

latched onto that little word ‘technically’<br />

as representing everything<br />

they hated about Nestorius.<br />

‘If Mary is not technically the<br />

Mother of God,’ they said, ‘then<br />

her Son is not technically God.’ ”<br />

Everyone but the new archbishop<br />

knew that was wrong.<br />

Rome and Alexandria eventually<br />

got into the fight. Nestorius<br />

doubled down. Finally, the emperor<br />

(or possibly his virgin sister)<br />

called a council at a place named<br />

Ephesus. What happened there<br />

was like a long bingefest of “The<br />

Three Stooges” with some “Game<br />

of Thrones” thrown in.<br />

Ultimately, of course, Mary was even<br />

more firmly enthroned as the Mother<br />

of God. And Nestorius, who deserves<br />

our gratitude for precipitating that<br />

doctrinal decision, was exiled to the<br />

Great Oasis of Egypt.<br />

Error — and even evil: they just can’t<br />

win against the one, holy, catholic and<br />

apostolic Church. <br />

Jane Greer edited and published<br />

“Plains Poetry Journal” and is author<br />

of “Bathsheba on the Third Day.”<br />

<strong>May</strong> <strong>17</strong>, <strong>2019</strong> • ANGELUS • 23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!