08.04.2019 Views

ARISTOTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICS vol.I by Eduard Zeller, B.F.C.Costelloe 1897

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!! Strabo – “Geography” “There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.” (Strab. 7.fragments.9) ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)

ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!!

Strabo – “Geography”
“There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.”
(Strab. 7.fragments.9)

ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

:<br />

:<br />

tract cited in the Be Ccelo '<br />

<strong>ARISTOTLE</strong>'S WHITINGS 125<br />

was written later than that<br />

work. 2 The Meteorology refers to the Be Sensu<br />

yet in its own preamble it<br />

3<br />

and<br />

described itself as the close<br />

of the series of investigations as to inorganic nature, after<br />

which the works on Animals and Plants were to be taken<br />

up. The Natural History quotes the book on Plants,<br />

which is spoken of in texts that are demonstrably later<br />

as being still unwritten. 4 The same treatise on Plants<br />

is referred to in an early section of the Hepl £mcov<br />

yeveasas as already existing, and in a later one as yet<br />

to come. 6 The lost book on Pood is quoted in the<br />

Be Somno ;<br />

6<br />

in the later works on the Parts and<br />

Generation of Animals, it is promised as in the future. 7<br />

There is a similar relation of cross reference between<br />

these same tracts and one of the lesser physiological<br />

126 <strong>ARISTOTLE</strong><br />

texts, 1 making it impossible to say which comes before<br />

the other. The tract on the Parts of Animals is cited<br />

once in that on the Motion of Animals, which it cites<br />

three times itself. 2<br />

How are we to treat this peculiarity ?<br />

Are we so to<br />

pervert the formulae of reference in all these cases as to<br />

read what ostensibly refers to an earlier writing as if it<br />

were only an indication of something intended in a later<br />

one ?<br />

This would be negatived <strong>by</strong> the number of cases in<br />

which the phenomenon recurs—itself a notable fact— and<br />

also <strong>by</strong> the circumstance that in several cases the assumption<br />

of the later treatise as a thing already in existence is<br />

too intimately interwoven with the tenor of the passage<br />

to allow the change. 3 The like reasons stand equally<br />

against the theory that these abnormal references crept<br />

into the text after Aristotle's death. 4 But there is a far<br />

1<br />

Be Ccelo, ii. 2, 284, b, 13<br />

if the world had a right and left<br />

side, it would also be obliged to<br />

have an above and below, a before<br />

and behind ; SubpiOTai piv oZv irepl<br />

roiruv iv rois trepl rks twv £(po>v<br />

Kivfiacts (Ingr. An. 2, 704, b, 18,<br />

sqq., ibid, c, 4 sq.) Sm -rb rrjs<br />

tptiffeas oiKeta rqs ineiva>v elvat.<br />

- This is proved not only from<br />

Meteorol. i. 1 fin. but also because<br />

the History of Animals and n.<br />

%4 av p-optuv are quoted ; see Iml.<br />

Arist. 100, a, 55 sq.<br />

3 III. 2 fin.<br />

: €

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!