08.04.2019 Views

ARISTOTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICS vol.I by Eduard Zeller, B.F.C.Costelloe 1897

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!! Strabo – “Geography” “There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.” (Strab. 7.fragments.9) ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)

ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!!

Strabo – “Geography”
“There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.”
(Strab. 7.fragments.9)

ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

;<br />

56 <strong>ARISTOTLE</strong><br />

<strong>ARISTOTLE</strong>'S WRITINGS 55<br />

A second section of the writings may include those<br />

which dealt with scientific questions, but were yet<br />

essentially distinct in form from all the extant treatises,<br />

namely, the Dialogues. l We have repeated proofs 2<br />

that Aristotle, in one class of his works, did make<br />

use of the form of dialogue. It is said that his<br />

Dialogues differed from those of Plato in the fact<br />

that the individuality of the persons con . -trsing was<br />

not carried through, 3 and that the author kept the<br />

lead of the conversation in his own hands. 4 Of the<br />

known works of this kind, the Eudemus, 5 the three<br />

books On Philosophy 6 and the four books On Jus-<br />

291, and Mullek, Script, rer.<br />

Alex. pref. v.<br />

1<br />

Cf . Bernays, Bialoge d. Ar.<br />

(1863), Heitz, Verl. Sohr. 141-<br />

221, Rose, Ar. Pseud. 23 sq.<br />

2 Cf. Cic. Ad Att. xiii. 19, 4,<br />

Basil. Ep. 135 (167) ap. Rose,<br />

Ar. Ps. 24, Plut. Adv. Col. 14, 4,<br />

Dio Cheys. Or 53, p. 274, Alex.<br />

ap. David, Selwl. in Ar. 24, b,<br />

33, David, ibid. 24, b, 10 sq., 26,<br />

b, 35; Philop. ibid. 35, b, 41,<br />

and Be An. E. 2 ; PBOCL. ap.<br />

Philop. JEtem. M. 2, 2 (of.<br />

Ar. Fr. 10) and In Tim. 338 d;<br />

Ammon. Categ. 6, b (ap. Stahe,<br />

Ar. ii. 255) ; Simpl. Phys. 2, b<br />

Peiscian, Solut. Proasm. p. 553 b.<br />

s<br />

Basil. Ep. 135 (167) ap.<br />

Rose, Ar. Pseud. 24. Ar. Fr. 1474.<br />

Heitz, 146.<br />

4 Cic. ut supra. Ad Quint.<br />

Fr. iii. 5 does not refer to Dialogues.<br />

Aristotelius mos,' in Cic.<br />

'<br />

AdFani.i. 9, 23, has a wider sense;<br />

and refers to the in utramque<br />

'<br />

partem disputare,' cf . De Orat. iii.<br />

21, 80 ; but see Heitz, 149.<br />

5<br />

This remarkable Dialogue<br />

(de a. v. Beenays, 21, 143 etc.,<br />

and Rhein. Mus. xvi. 236 sq.,<br />

ROSE, Ar. Ps. 52 sq., Ar. Fr. 32-<br />

43, p. 1479, Fr. Hz. 47) is called<br />

EiiBiiuos (Themist. De An. 197,<br />

and cf. quotations in Ar. Fr.<br />

41), or 'ncpl tyuX rjs (D. 13, An. 13,<br />

Plut. Dio 22), or Ei/STj/tos % w.<br />

jfivxv' (Plut. Cons, ad Apol. 27,<br />

p. 115, and Simpl. ap. Ar. Fr.<br />

42). We learn from Plut. Dio<br />

22, and Cic. Divin. 1, 25, 53,<br />

that it was dedicated to Aristotle's<br />

friend, Eudemus, who died in<br />

Sicily 352 B.C. (cf.p. 11 n. 4 supra),<br />

and it was probably written soon<br />

after (Keische, Forsch. i. 16).<br />

Of the Fragments ascribed to it <strong>by</strong><br />

Rose, more probable places will be<br />

indicated infra for Fr. 36, 38, and<br />

43. Aristotle himself seems, in De<br />

An. i. 4, in/it. to refer to a discussionin<br />

the Eudemus, cf. Ar.Fr. 41.<br />

6<br />

D. 3, An. 3 (who <strong>by</strong><br />

oversight gives four books),<br />

Beenays, 47, 95, Rose, Ar. Ps.<br />

27, Ar. Fr. 1-21, p. 1474, Heitz,<br />

Verl. Sohr. 179 sq., Fr. Hz. 30 sq.,<br />

Bywatee, 'Aristotle's Dialogue<br />

tice l seemto have been the most important. The first two<br />

are of particular interest, because they stand in such close<br />

relation, not only <strong>by</strong> their form but <strong>by</strong> their<br />

subjects,<br />

to the work of Plato, that there is much to be said for<br />

the conjecture that they were written in the period<br />

when Aristotle still belonged to the circle of Plato s<br />

scholars, and had not yet fully passed over to his later<br />

independer.'. position. 2 There are certain other works<br />

on Philosophy,' Jov/rn. of Philol.<br />

vii. 64 sq. Priscian tells us the<br />

work was a dialogue (Solut.<br />

Proasm. p. 553), and it is confirmed<br />

<strong>by</strong> the statement (Pl.tit.<br />

Adv. Col. 14, 4, Procl. ap. PHILOP.<br />

Mt. it. 2, 2; v. Ar. Fr. 10)<br />

that Aristotle had in his Dialogues<br />

attacked and renounced<br />

the Ideal Theory ; cf . Ar. Fr.<br />

11 from the second book n.<br />

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!