08.04.2019 Views

ARISTOTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICS vol.I by Eduard Zeller, B.F.C.Costelloe 1897

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!! Strabo – “Geography” “There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.” (Strab. 7.fragments.9) ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)

ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!!

Strabo – “Geography”
“There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.”
(Strab. 7.fragments.9)

ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

;:<br />

PHYSICS 475<br />

This position draws further support from experience.<br />

For he contends that if the spaces of the heavens, as well<br />

as the intermediate<br />

space between heaven and earth,<br />

were full of air or fire, then the bulk of these elements,<br />

considering the magnitude of the stars and their distance<br />

from each other, would be so hugely disproportioned to<br />

that of the remaining elements that the latter could not<br />

preserve their equilibrium, but would be swallowed up<br />

<strong>by</strong> them. A proper proportion between the elements '<br />

can therefore only be maintained on the hypothesis that<br />

the celestial space is filled with a body different from the<br />

matter of the elements. We 2 are also led to believe that<br />

this body is superior to all change, <strong>by</strong> the fact that<br />

antiquity, so far as tradition reaches, furnishes us with<br />

no evidence of the least alteration in the fabric of the<br />

heaven or its parts. 3 Finally, the unthinking belief of<br />

humanity harmonises with this<br />

conviction, and such a<br />

belief deserves respect as the inheritance of unnumbered<br />

generations. 4 All nations have placed the residence of<br />

the gods in heaven, because they were convinced of its<br />

immortal and divine nature. The name ' aether ' may<br />

be traced to the same source, for Aristotle, like Plato, 5<br />

derives it from del dsiv, from the restless rotation of<br />

3<br />

treatise on birth and destruc- De Ccelo, i. 3, 270, b, 11.<br />

tion.<br />

4<br />

ov yap aira| ou5e Sis a\A*<br />

1<br />

Such a proportion in<strong>vol</strong>ves airetpdicis Se? voiiifeiv t&s uvtzs<br />

that there is as much air and as atpiKveiaBai S6^as els ri/ias. De,<br />

much fire as will be produced <strong>by</strong> Ccelo, 270, b, 19. See Meteor.<br />

the transformation of all water 339, b, 27, where the same reason<br />

into air and all air into fire on is given in almost the same<br />

the basis of the existing quanti- words, and Metapli. xii. 8 ad fin.<br />

tative extent of these bodies. See infra, the section of Ch. IX.<br />

2 Meteor, i. 3, 339, b, 13-340, on the Heavens, and Ch.XII.pt. 2.<br />

a, 18.<br />

s<br />

Plato, Crat. 410, b.<br />

470 <strong>ARISTOTLE</strong><br />

the celestial globes, and not from aWsiv. 1<br />

The conclusion<br />

is that the asther must be distinguished from all<br />

elementary matter. 2<br />

1<br />

De Casio, i. 3, 270, b, 4-25<br />

Meteor, i. 3, 339, b, 19 sqq.<br />

and following these passages<br />

De Mundo, c. 2, 392, a, 5. On<br />

the name ' aether,' cf. Zell. Ph.<br />

d. Or. i. 897, 4 ad fin.<br />

2<br />

Although it is called mparov<br />

ittoix«ov, Dp Cado, iii. 1, 298, b,<br />

6 ; Meteor, i. 1, 338, b, 21 ; c. 3,<br />

339, b, 16, 340, b, 11, rb ruv<br />

acrrptav (TTOix^ov; Gen. An. iii.<br />

3, 737, a, 1, it is yet expressly<br />

distinguished in these passages<br />

from the four o-TDixeta. Gen. An.<br />

ii. 3, 736, b, 29, it is called Urepov<br />

(Tu/xa Kal 8et6repov t£>v Ka\ovfi4vtav<br />

o-toix*'""' ; Meteor, i. 3, 340, b, 7<br />

(cf . p. 488, n. 3, infra), erepov o-Sjua<br />

irvpds T€ Kal aepos ; and De Cosh,<br />

i. 2, 269, a, 30 : oiicia ctefiaros<br />

&\hri irapa ras ivravda ffvffra'fftis<br />

6etor4pa Kal Trporepa rofrruv andvtuv<br />

;<br />

cf. ibid. o. 3 (following n.).<br />

If, therefore, we understand <strong>by</strong><br />

oToixeia only such simple bodies<br />

as stand to one another in the<br />

relation of opposites, and pass<br />

into one another, we cannot<br />

reckon the aather among these.<br />

Only when we extend the meaning<br />

of the word to embrace all<br />

simple bodies can we call it a<br />

aroix&ov. On the other hand, it<br />

is, to say the least of it, inaccurate<br />

and misleading to say<br />

Without opposition and without<br />

that according to Aristotle the<br />

celestial spheres have no material<br />

substratum ' (Bbkntano,<br />

'<br />

Psyclwl. d. Arist. 198 ; Hebtling,<br />

Mat. und Form, 22), that 'the<br />

a3th er consists of a material which<br />

is 'no material, of an immaterial<br />

material ' (Kampe, Erlienntnissth.<br />

d. Arist. 30 sq.) that all<br />

that is meant <strong>by</strong> the BAij of the<br />

stars is the potentiality they<br />

possess of motion and change<br />

in space, and that in this sense<br />

we might even attribute SAtj to<br />

vovs (Heetling, Hid. 23). Aristotle<br />

certainly says, Metaph. viii.<br />

4, 1044, b, 7 : in the case of<br />

ytwtrral ovaiai, we have to deal<br />

both with their matter and form<br />

it is otherwise with (pvaucaX piv<br />

atbioL 8e ovaiai. iaws yap tvta<br />

(<br />

ovk 6X<br />

€I faviv, ff oil roiavTfjv aWa.<br />

fx6vov KaTard-rrov K

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!