08.04.2019 Views

ARISTOTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICS vol.I by Eduard Zeller, B.F.C.Costelloe 1897

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!! Strabo – “Geography” “There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.” (Strab. 7.fragments.9) ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)

ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!!

Strabo – “Geography”
“There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.”
(Strab. 7.fragments.9)

ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

;<br />

460 <strong>ARISTOTLE</strong><br />

PHYSICS 459<br />

•<br />

above material necessity, the design of the universe<br />

above the physical explanations of nature, the teleological.<br />

Our researches up to this point have already led to<br />

the conclusion that everything in nature has its End.<br />

If Nature is the inner cause of motion, every motion<br />

has its goal <strong>by</strong> which its measure and direction are<br />

determined.'<br />

If the essence of things consists in their<br />

form, the form is not to be distinguished from their<br />

End. 2 If everything which moves must of necessity be<br />

moved <strong>by</strong> something else, it follows that the ultimate<br />

cause of movement resides in that which moves the<br />

universe as its Final Cause, 3 and movement in general<br />

can only be conceived as the action of form upon<br />

matter, in which the former is the object of '<br />

desire,' and<br />

so the goal towards which the latter strives. 4 Aristotle<br />

cannot conceive<br />

of regulated and orderly events<br />

except under the analogy of human action directed<br />

towards an end.<br />

Hence while combating the theory<br />

of an anima mundi in the form in which it had been<br />

held <strong>by</strong> Plato, he adopts himself a similar view. 5 He<br />

1<br />

See p. 341, n. 2, supra. consists of circular motion, or of<br />

2<br />

See p. 356 sqq., p. 418, and any motion at all. It would be<br />

p. 462, n. 2. inconsistent with its perfect<br />

3<br />

See p. 404, and p. 396, n. 3. happiness that it should be inter-<br />

4<br />

See p. 383, and p. 379, n. 1. mixed with the body of the<br />

5<br />

Be An. i. 3, 406, b, 25 world and, burdened with the<br />

sqq. ; Be Ccclo, ii. 1, 284, a, 27 latter, should have unintermitsqq.<br />

; Metapk. xii. 6, 1071, b, 37. tently to produce, like an Ixion<br />

Aristotle rejects this theory in with bis wheel, a, motion which<br />

the first place because he cannot had no affinity with its nature<br />

regard the soul as in any sense a and which therefore in<strong>vol</strong>ved<br />

iiigtum and therefore not even as exertion. Nor, indeed, is it shown<br />

tavrb kuiovv (see the beginning of bow it produces it. Lastly, the<br />

Ch. X. infra). He further objects soul cannot be apxh as asserted<br />

that Plato conceives of the soul of in the Pluedrus, if, according to<br />

the world as something extended the Timieus, it comes into existin<br />

space. But it would be impos- ence only with the world.<br />

sible to suppose that its thought<br />

refers not only the movement of the outermost sphere,<br />

which communicates itself to all others, but also that of<br />

the stars, like Plato, to the action of spirits, which are<br />

related to the spheres moved <strong>by</strong> them as the human<br />

soul is to the body. 1 He even treats the forces of<br />

nature in general, to a certain extent, from the same<br />

point of view : in the eternity of motion he recognises<br />

the immortal life of nature, 2 and he even ascribes a sort<br />

of animation to the elements. 3<br />

also, as we shall see, 4<br />

for everything in living beings is<br />

Every vital activity is<br />

an activity guided <strong>by</strong> a purpose,<br />

related to the soul as<br />

the incorporeal unity of the corporeal existence.<br />

Hence<br />

it follows that <strong>by</strong> regarding nature as a living whole,<br />

1<br />

Cf. p. 373 sq. and see the section<br />

in tlie next chapter concerning<br />

the Spheres. Aristotle is so<br />

far justified from his own point<br />

of view in treating both the world<br />

as a whole, and its individual<br />

parts as animated with life, as he<br />

does also Be Cmlo, ii. 12 followed<br />

<strong>by</strong> Eudemus (Fr. 76 b, Simpl.<br />

Phys. 283 m. : cf. Siebeck, D.<br />

Lelne d Ar. v. d. Leben d. Unirermtm,<br />

in Fiehte s Ztschr f. Phil. lx.<br />

3 ). 1<br />

God is a part of the universe<br />

in the same sense in which reason<br />

is a part of the man<br />

;<br />

and of the<br />

same nature is the relation of the<br />

spheral spirits to their spheres.<br />

Each of these spirits, however,<br />

animates only the sphere which<br />

it moves and the primvm movens<br />

only the irparos oipav6s. While<br />

the movement of the latter, indeed,<br />

extends to all the other<br />

spheres, yet in their case it is<br />

something1 communicated from<br />

without like the motion of the<br />

driver on a carriage ; their own<br />

proper motion, on the other hand,<br />

is due, not to-the pnmu?n inovens,<br />

but to particular motors. Although<br />

the whole world is thus<br />

animated, yet Aristotle refuses to.<br />

call it with Plato i'lpoy, because<br />

its life springs from nn single<br />

principle of motion.<br />

/<br />

z<br />

Phys. viii. 1 init. : ridVepoi'<br />

5e yeyoj/e irore kIvtj(Tis ouk nficru<br />

Trp6repov, Kal

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!