ARISTOTLE AND THE EARLIER PERIPATETICS vol.I by Eduard Zeller, B.F.C.Costelloe 1897
MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine) ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!! Strabo – “Geography” “There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.” (Strab. 7.fragments.9) ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA
MACEDONIA is GREECE and will always be GREECE- (if they are desperate to steal a name, Monkeydonkeys suits them just fine)
ΚΑΤΩ ΤΟ ΠΡΟΔΟΤΙΚΟ "ΣΥΝΤΑΓΜΑΤΙΚΟ ΤΟΞΟ"!!!
Strabo – “Geography”
“There remain of Europe, first, Macedonia and the parts of Thrace that are contiguous to it and extend as far as Byzantium; secondly, Greece; and thirdly, the islands that are close by. Macedonia, of course, is a part of Greece, yet now, since I am following the nature and shape of the places geographically, I have decided to classify it apart from the rest of Greece and to join it with that part of Thrace which borders on it and extends as far as the mouth of the Euxine and the Propontis. Then, a little further on, Strabo mentions Cypsela and the Hebrus River, and also describes a sort of parallelogram in which the whole of Macedonia lies.”
(Strab. 7.fragments.9)
ΚΚΕ, ΚΝΕ, ΟΝΝΕΔ, ΑΓΟΡΑ,ΕΚΚΛΗΣΙΑ,ΝΕΑ,ΦΩΝΗ,ΦΕΚ,ΝΟΜΟΣ,LIFO,MACEDONIA, ALEXANDER, GREECE,IKEA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
:<br />
:<br />
METAPHYSICS 351<br />
•<br />
and Matter, therefore, require nothing further to mediate<br />
between them in order to<br />
produce a whole, but are<br />
immediately united : Form is the definiteness of<br />
Matter in itself indefinite ; Matter receives into itself<br />
directly tl , lacking definiteness of Form. When the<br />
Potential passes into the Actual, these elements do not<br />
stand opposed to one another as two separate things,<br />
but one and the same thing looked at as Matter is<br />
the Potentiality of that of which the Actuality is its<br />
Form. 1<br />
But just as we may not regard Form and Matter in<br />
their mutual relation as two heterogeneous substances,<br />
so neither may we regard either of them in any case as<br />
a single substance, so as to imply that one Matter and<br />
one Form constitute the fundamental elements which in<br />
various combinations produce the<br />
aggregate of things.<br />
Aristotle recognises, indeed, in the Divine Spirit a<br />
being which is pure Form without Matter. Yet he<br />
does not treat this as the intelligible idea of all<br />
Forms,<br />
the universal, spiritual substance of all things, but as<br />
an individual being, beside which all other individual<br />
beings exist as so many substances. In like manner<br />
Aristotle recognises a fundamental matter, which, while<br />
in the elements and generally in all<br />
particular kinds of<br />
matter it assumes different forms and qualities, yet is in<br />
itself one and the same in all bodies.<br />
Yet this primitive<br />
'<br />
, Metaph. viii. 6, 1045, b, 17: elfpijTai koX % io-xarn KAtj [of. p.<br />
to the question how the elements 348, n. 1] ho! t\ /j.op
Change language