24.01.2019 Views

brozura-meranie-EN

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

IMPACT MEASUREM<strong>EN</strong>T<br />

of Generation 3.0 Awarded Projects


G<strong>EN</strong>ERATION 3.0 CYCLE<br />

System changes<br />

We communicate with<br />

stakeholders to integrate<br />

the verified educational<br />

approaches into<br />

the education system.<br />

Applying for<br />

Generation 3.0<br />

Evaluation<br />

committee<br />

The Lab<br />

The aim of the two-day<br />

bootcamp is to select the best<br />

projects led by motivated teams<br />

prepared to disseminate their<br />

approaches to Slovak schools.<br />

Awards<br />

Measurement<br />

We work with experts to<br />

monitor the effectiveness<br />

and dissemination<br />

of awarded projects.<br />

The best projects receive<br />

a financial grant of € 15,000<br />

and professional support<br />

in monitoring their impact.<br />

Personality Prepared for Changes<br />

Natural Sciences and Technology Knowledge<br />

EDUmap<br />

Educational<br />

approaches<br />

online map.<br />

Career and Entrepreneurial Skills<br />

Social and Civic Competences<br />

Innovations in the System of Education<br />

EDUpoints<br />

(Bratislava, Košice, Zvolen)<br />

EDUpoint is a place<br />

to educate teachers, school<br />

principals, and parents<br />

as well as to disseminate<br />

educational approaches.<br />

MentorExpres<br />

In a three-month accelerator<br />

programme, business experts advise<br />

the best organisations in the Lab<br />

on how to develop and disseminate<br />

their approaches most effectively.<br />

Give our children and young people<br />

the chance to develop their full potential<br />

and acquire the knowledge, values<br />

and skills necessary for the 21 st century.<br />

3


RESEARCH DESIGN<br />

In the first year of the Generation 3.0 programme, we monitored<br />

the effectiveness of awarded educational approaches. For each<br />

of them, we had designed a research project with its objectives,<br />

questions, and hypotheses which we were verifying during<br />

the entire school year. The results are in the report you hold in your<br />

hands. In it, we summarise the course of the research and show<br />

to what extent the projects develop young people’s skills,<br />

knowledge, and attitudes necessary for life in the 21 st century.<br />

In this second year, we are modifying the ways of monitoring<br />

the impact of awarded projects.<br />

In order to meet our goal – to reach 15,000 teachers and learning<br />

guides, it is not necessary for each project to carry out<br />

time-consuming and costly research. After all, even the most<br />

detailed analysis that confirms the impact of the educational<br />

approach does not automatically ensure its integration into<br />

the system. For that, the projects would have to be accepted<br />

by all stakeholders and as widely as possible.<br />

Through ongoing monitoring, we will be able to better advise<br />

the organisations on how to develop their projects so that they can<br />

be disseminated to schools as efficiently as possible. The evaluation<br />

and result monitoring must be flexible and show that the approach<br />

brings both changes in the education system and the potential<br />

for dissemination.<br />

We have modified the result evaluation strategy to gain answers<br />

to three basic questions:<br />

4


1. Is the educational approach effective?<br />

In the first step, researchers will use professional literature<br />

to find out whether such an educational approach already exists<br />

and works somewhere in the world. They will assess whether<br />

these conclusions suffice for the assessment of the effectiveness<br />

of the educational approach under the Slovak conditions.<br />

Consequently, they will prepare a research design and calculate<br />

its approximate costs. They will also prepare a short study<br />

with an estimate of the benefits and costs compared to similar<br />

projects implemented in Slovakia.<br />

2. Is the educational approach disseminatable?<br />

The researchers will assess whether the approach is disseminatable<br />

under the conditions of the Slovak education system<br />

and whether the organisation has sufficient capacities to do so.<br />

3. What are the lessons learnt for further dissemination,<br />

evaluation and research activities?<br />

We will use the feedback from people involved in the project<br />

implementation and dissemination of similar educational<br />

approaches.<br />

5


C. S. LEWIS BILINGUAL HIGH SCHOOL<br />

Personality Development Programme and the Transition of the C. S. Lewis Grammar<br />

High School to an Inclusive Community<br />

Education research expert: Martin Kuruc<br />

The goal of the school is to produce graduates with a solid character and high-quality<br />

education. That is why character education is a part of the school curriculum<br />

as a whole. It is applied across all subjects and at all levels – including all, the pupils,<br />

teachers, and the leadership. In the course of five years, the students are asked<br />

in different ways about their motivation (how do I define success?), identity (who am<br />

I?), mission (why was I born?), faith (what are my beliefs?), and the use of acquired skills<br />

and attitudes in the future (what will I do with all these in the next 50 years?). Together<br />

with their mentors – teachers, the students look for answers to these questions.<br />

What We Measured<br />

Hypothesis 1 (hereafter H): We assume that teachers show a significantly higher<br />

proportion of positive than negative attitudes towards the inclusion<br />

of disadvantaged pupils.<br />

H2: We assume that in students of higher grades there is a significantly higher<br />

proportion of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged students<br />

than in first-year students.<br />

H3: We assume that the first-year students will show a smaller share of positive<br />

attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged students at the beginning<br />

of the school year than at the end of the school year.<br />

Research question (focus groups): What are the elements of inclusion in social<br />

relationships in the school?<br />

Impact Measurement<br />

There were 253 pupils and 19 out of 50 teachers participated in the research. Data<br />

were obtained through a quantitative method using questionnaires and a qualitative<br />

method through focus groups. In the case of H3 and focus groups, data were collected<br />

at the beginning and at the end of the school year.<br />

6


Research Results<br />

H1: Following from the analysis of collected data, we can state that the H1 has<br />

been confirmed. When there are 14 teachers in a school, all of whose attitudes<br />

are pro-inclusive, and 5 whose attitudes are at least partially pro-inclusive,<br />

it provides a good prerequisite for a gradual creation of pro-inclusive<br />

atmosphere throughout the school.<br />

H2: Following from the analysis of the collected data we can say that<br />

H2 has not been confirmed. In the higher grades, there was not a significantly<br />

higher proportion of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged<br />

students than in first-year students. A possible explanation may be that pupils<br />

concentrate on mastering their quite demanding studies and have no internal<br />

capacity to address these issues. It can also be related to the issue<br />

of development. During this period, the students still need to cope with their own<br />

changes. The adolescent children tend to close up so that they can find stability<br />

within themselves and then open up to the world.<br />

Still, based on the overall data, we can consider pupils’ attitudes<br />

to be significantly pro-inclusive. 95% of students had a positive mindset<br />

in all three components of attitudes – affective, behavioral, and cognitive.<br />

H3: Following from the analysis of the collected data, we can claim that<br />

H3 has not been confirmed, which means that the first-year students did not<br />

show a smaller share of positive attitudes towards inclusion of disadvantaged<br />

students at the beginning of the school year than at the end of the school year.<br />

(To see the explanation of this result, please see H2.)<br />

Focus groups: Elements of inclusion are manifested by the development<br />

of informal relationships between students and teachers based on partnership<br />

and helpfulness, which have been differentiated by mutual sympathy during<br />

the school year. The informal atmosphere of the school, the opportunity to join<br />

various activities and engage publically contribute to inclusion. However, the<br />

amount of activities also brings the burden (sometimes, it seems to be excessive).<br />

7


EDUMA<br />

Online Live Library<br />

Education research expert: Ivan Lukšík<br />

The online live library is a video portal that uses storytelling to show children<br />

and young people what it feels like to live with certain disadvantages and obstacles.<br />

Storytelling is the best way of introducing any topic to children. There are dozens<br />

of personal testimonies of “living books” at the onlinezivakniznica.sk website, which<br />

can be used in teaching multiple subjects. Thanks to the encounters with the stories,<br />

children can better empathise with other people and their situations, look<br />

at things from another point of view, and learn to be empathetic. The online live library<br />

strengthens students’ critical thinking and helps prevent prejudices against diversity.<br />

What We Measured<br />

Research Question 1: How have teachers who participated in EDUMA education<br />

“Through Storytelling to Inclusion” changed their thinking and attitudes towards<br />

inclusion? Has there been a shift towards critical thinking?<br />

Research Question 2: How have the pupils with whom these teachers<br />

subsequently worked using the “Through Storytelling to Inclusion” programme<br />

changed their thinking? Has there been a shift towards critical thinking?<br />

Impact Measurement<br />

The research sample consisted of 12 teachers, 26 pupils in the experimental group<br />

and 29 pupils in the control group. We used a questionnaire method. Teachers were<br />

supposed to comment on the claims about Roma children, migrants, and so on before<br />

and after the educational programme “Through Storytelling to Inclusion”. Then, they<br />

used the programme as part of their teaching. Their pupils were tested before and after<br />

the programme.<br />

8


Research Results<br />

Research Question 1: The results of the evaluation show that the teachers<br />

who participated in the programme are able to work with their prejudices.<br />

They take a critical look at their own prejudices, for doing which pro-inclusion<br />

attitudes and critical thinking are essential. Teachers use inclusive elements<br />

in the learning process and create conditions for the critical thinking of pupils.<br />

Research Question 2: The results show that after completing the programme,<br />

pupils take a critical look at their own ethnic stereotypes and start thinking<br />

in a broader context. In relation to migrants, there has been a shift from rejection<br />

and fear of diversity towards help in need, empathy, and consideration<br />

of political contexts.<br />

CIVIC ASSOCIATION OWL<br />

ChemPlay - Advancement<br />

Education research expert: Romana Kanovská<br />

ChemPlay is a board game that introduces players to inorganic chemistry, its logic<br />

and laws, and helps develop analytical thinking, critical thinking, and teamwork.<br />

Its inventors are Ivana Kravárova and Adrián Hegedűš. During their studies<br />

at a grammar school, they noticed that their classmates were not used to think<br />

creatively. The students also did not know how to use theoretical knowledge<br />

in practice even though chemistry provides loads of scope for creativity. The game<br />

has become popular at schools and is available for sale to anyone who wants to learn<br />

about the beauty of chemistry in a fun and effective way. Civic Association OWL is now<br />

creating a mobile app as an advancement of the board game.<br />

What We Measured<br />

H1: We assume that pupils taught using the ChemPlay board game will show<br />

a higher level of knowledge than the pupils taught frontally.<br />

H2: We assume that students taught using the ChemPlay board game will show<br />

a higher degree of internal motivation than the pupils taught frontally.<br />

H3: We assume that pupils taught using the ChemPlay board game will show more<br />

positive attitudes towards their teacher than pupils taught frontally.<br />

9


Impact Measurement<br />

There were 10 selected Slovak grammar schools (an experimental group of 5 schools<br />

+ a control group of 5 schools) were involved in the research. The experimental group<br />

consisted of 67 pupils, the control group had 65 pupils.<br />

Data collection took place through a quantitative method in the form of questionnaires<br />

at the beginning and at the end of the school year.<br />

Research Results<br />

H1: In the experimental group (schools using ChemPlay), the difference<br />

in the level of knowledge between the entry and end results of the first year<br />

pupils was moderately better (entry level of knowledge: 69.1%, end level: 79.5%).<br />

In the control group (schools without ChemPlay), the difference in the level<br />

of knowledge between entry and exit results of the first year pupils was<br />

slightly better (entry level of knowledge: 69.4%, exit level: 76.9%)<br />

It follows that the schools which used ChemPlay during the school year show<br />

somewhat better results than the schools that did not use this board game.<br />

Given that the board game has only been used rarely in schools, we can assume<br />

that regular playing would lead to even more significant results.<br />

H2 + H3: In pupils’ attitudes towards their teachers and their motivation to learn<br />

chemistry, we did not record any significant differences between the control<br />

and experimental group. This is probably due to the fact that the two selected<br />

groups were very balanced and made up of very clever and motivated pupils.<br />

Romana Kanovská<br />

Director of the<br />

National Institute<br />

for Certified Educational<br />

Measurements<br />

Martin Kuruc<br />

Researcher at the<br />

Faculty of Education,<br />

the Comenius University<br />

Ivan Lukšík<br />

Social and pedagogical<br />

psychologist and lecturer<br />

at the Faculty of Education,<br />

the University of Trnava<br />

10


WE WOULD LIKE TO THANK<br />

The Generation 3.0 programme is funded from individual, corporate, and institutional<br />

donors. Without listing their names upon their request, we would like to say a sincere<br />

thank you to all individual philanthropists. By dedicating their time, know-how,<br />

and finances, they contribute to the long-term sustainability and progress of the<br />

programme.<br />

Significant partners<br />

Main partners Partners With support<br />

11


generacia30.sk<br />

nadaciapontis.sk

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!