23.11.2018 Views

Richard H Thaler - Misbehaving- The Making of Behavioral Economics (epub)

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Econs are already doing the right thing. Nudges are supposedly irrelevant factors<br />

that influence our choices in ways that make us better <strong>of</strong>f. <strong>The</strong> fly further made<br />

clear to me that while Cass and I were capable <strong>of</strong> recognizing good nudges when<br />

we came across them, we were still missing an organizing principle for how to<br />

devise effective nudges.<br />

We had a breakthrough in finding our missing organizing principle when I<br />

reread Don Norman’s classic book <strong>The</strong> Design <strong>of</strong> Everyday Things. <strong>The</strong> book<br />

has one <strong>of</strong> the best covers I have ever seen. It is an image <strong>of</strong> a teapot that has<br />

both the handle and the spout on the same side. Think about it. After rereading<br />

Norman’s book, I realized we could apply many <strong>of</strong> his principles to the problems<br />

we were studying. I had recently bought my first iPhone, a device so easy to use<br />

that it didn’t need an instruction manual. What if we could design policies that<br />

were equally easy to create “user-centered” choice environments? At some point<br />

we adopted the term “choice architecture” to describe what we were trying to do.<br />

In curious ways, simply having that phrase to organize our thoughts helped us<br />

create a checklist <strong>of</strong> principles for good choice architecture, with many <strong>of</strong> the<br />

ideas borrowed from the human design literature. Designing good public policies<br />

has a lot in common with designing any consumer product.<br />

Now that we had our new set <strong>of</strong> tools, one big choice we had to make was<br />

which policy issues to try to address with them. Some topics that we had already<br />

written about were easy, but others required us to dig into the literature and see<br />

whether we could come up with anything useful or interesting. Some <strong>of</strong> these<br />

investigations led to dead ends. We drafted a chapter on Hurricane Katrina but<br />

cut it because we only found one remotely interesting idea, and it was not ours.<br />

John Tierney, a columnist for the New York Times, had a suggestion to encourage<br />

people to leave for higher ground before a storm strikes. Tierney’s idea was to<br />

<strong>of</strong>fer those who opt to stay a permanent ink marker and suggest they use it to<br />

write their Social Security number on their body, to aid in the identification <strong>of</strong><br />

victims after the storm. We had nothing nearly as good as that.<br />

In other cases, the research caused us to change our views on some subject. A<br />

good example <strong>of</strong> this is organ donations. When we made our list <strong>of</strong> topics, this<br />

was one <strong>of</strong> the first on the list because we knew <strong>of</strong> a paper that Eric Johnson had<br />

written with Daniel Goldstein on the powerful effect <strong>of</strong> default options in this<br />

domain. Most countries adopt some version <strong>of</strong> an opt-in policy, whereby donors<br />

have to take some positive step such as filling in a form in order to have their<br />

name added to the donor registry list. However, some countries in Europe, such<br />

as Spain, have adopted an opt-out strategy that is called “presumed consent.”<br />

You are presumed to give your permission to have your organs harvested unless<br />

you explicitly take the option to opt out and put your name on a list <strong>of</strong> “non-

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!