23.10.2018 Views

Coffee layout samples

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

U.S. Food Industry<br />

Profitability<br />

DRAFT October 1, 2018


<strong>Coffee</strong><br />

Ground/Beans<br />

2006<br />

24.7%<br />

Grocery 2011<br />

22.0%<br />

Avg 2006-2008<br />

19.0%<br />

19%<br />

2015<br />

16.9%<br />

2012<br />

12.3%<br />

Beverages 2012<br />

9.5%<br />

Pods<br />

13%<br />

2015<br />

16.9%<br />

Instant<br />

CST Estimated Range<br />

20% 25%<br />

30%<br />

Liquid, RTD<br />

35%<br />

Channel Dev<br />

Segment 2016<br />

41.8%


US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

Margins are generally related to the strength of the<br />

brand versus manufacturing scale: Kraft’s Maxwell<br />

House operating profit margin is estimated at 10%,<br />

with Folgers at 19%, and Peet’s at 22%, reflects this<br />

relationship<br />

1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. Starbucks<br />

3. Maxwell House (Heinz<br />

Kraft)<br />

4. Dunkin (JM Smucker<br />

under license)<br />

5. Peet’s<br />

• Keurig Green Mountain has a margin advantage<br />

as is the leading manufacturer of pods in the US<br />

for its own use, acts as a copacker for other<br />

brands, and also licenses brands for use in its<br />

pod business.<br />

• Globally, Nestle and its Nespresso machines is<br />

the largest coffee pod system, and is expected to<br />

make inroads in the US based on their $8 Billion<br />

arrangement with Starbucks to market and<br />

distribute the brand worldwide<br />

While not popular in the US, these products benefit<br />

from a brand umbrella in ground coffee or are a<br />

niche offering with a historically older consumer<br />

and not supported by advertising/consumer<br />

promotions, giving rise to attractive margins<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Green Mountain (JAB<br />

Holdings)<br />

3. Dunkin (Smuckers)<br />

1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. General Foods Instant<br />

3. Maxwell House<br />

4. Yuban (Kraft Heinz)<br />

Manufacturing scale and route distribution<br />

efficiency, sourced from carbonated soda partners<br />

(e.g. Starbucks/Pepsi) are the foundation for<br />

attractive brand leverage and profits<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Monster


Ground/Beans<br />

Pods<br />

Instant<br />

Liquid, RTD<br />

<strong>Coffee</strong><br />

Midpoint<br />

Estimate<br />

2006<br />

24.7%<br />

2015<br />

16.9%<br />

US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

19%<br />

Grocery 2011<br />

22.0%<br />

Avg 2006-2008<br />

19.0%<br />

2012<br />

12.3%<br />

Beverages<br />

2012<br />

9.5%<br />

1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. Starbucks<br />

3. Maxwell House (Heinz<br />

Kraft)<br />

4. Dunkin (JM Smucker<br />

under license)<br />

5. Peet’s<br />

Midpoint<br />

Estimate<br />

US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

13%<br />

2015<br />

16.9%<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Green Mountain (JAB<br />

Holdings)<br />

3. Dunkin (Smuckers)<br />

Midpoint<br />

Estimate<br />

US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

25%<br />

CST Estimated Range<br />

20%-30%<br />

1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. General Foods Instant<br />

3. Maxwell House<br />

4. Yuban (Kraft Heinz)<br />

Midpoint<br />

Estimate<br />

US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

35%<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Monster<br />

Channel Dev<br />

Segment 2016<br />

41.8%


Margins are generally related to the strength of the brand versus<br />

manufacturing scale: Kraft’s Maxwell House operating profit margin is<br />

estimated at 10%, with Folgers at 19%, and Peet’s at 22%, reflects this<br />

relationship<br />

• Keurig Green Mountain has a margin advantage as is<br />

the leading manufacturer of pods in the US for its<br />

own use, acts as a copacker for other brands, and<br />

also licenses brands for use in its pod business.<br />

• Globally, Nestle and its Nespresso machines is the<br />

largest coffee pod system, and is expected to make<br />

inroads in the US based on their $8 Billion<br />

arrangement with Starbucks to market and distribute<br />

the brand worldwide<br />

While not popular in the US, these products<br />

benefit from a brand umbrella in ground coffee<br />

or are a niche offering with a historically older<br />

consumer and not supported by advertising/<br />

consumer promotions, giving rise to attractive<br />

margins<br />

Manufacturing scale and route distribution<br />

efficiency, sourced from carbonated soda<br />

partners (e.g. Starbucks/Pepsi) are the<br />

foundation for attractive brand leverage and<br />

profits


Category<br />

Ground/Beans<br />

Kraft Beverages 2012 9.5%<br />

US Market Share/<br />

Rank Order<br />

Pods<br />

DE Master Blender ("DE") 2012 12.3%<br />

Green Mountain/ Keurig 2015 16.9%<br />

Midpoint Estimate 19.0%<br />

Folgers Avg 2006-2008 19.0%<br />

Peet's Grocery 2011 22.0%<br />

Eight O'Clock 2006 24.7%<br />

Midpoint Estimate 13.0%<br />

Keurig 2015 16.9%<br />

1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. Starbucks<br />

3. Maxwell House (Heinz Kraft)<br />

4. Dunkin (JM Smucker under<br />

license)<br />

5. Peet’s<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Green Mountain (JAB Holdings)<br />

3. Dunkin (Smuckers)<br />

Instant 1. Folgers (JM Smuckers)<br />

2. General Foods Instant<br />

CST Estimated Range 20-30%<br />

3. Maxwell House<br />

Midpoint Estimate 25.0% 4. Yuban (Kraft Heinz)<br />

Liquid, RTD<br />

Midpoint Estimate 35%<br />

Starbucks Channel Dev<br />

Segment 2016<br />

41.8%<br />

1. Starbucks<br />

2. Monster


Margins are generally related to the strength of the brand versus<br />

manufacturing scale: Kraft’s Maxwell House operating profit margin is<br />

estimated at 10%, with Folgers at 19%, and Peet’s at 22%, reflects this<br />

relationship<br />

• Keurig Green Mountain has a margin advantage as is<br />

the leading manufacturer of pods in the US for its<br />

own use, acts as a copacker for other brands, and<br />

also licenses brands for use in its pod business.<br />

• Globally, Nestle and its Nespresso machines is the<br />

largest coffee pod system, and is expected to make<br />

inroads in the US based on their $8 Billion<br />

arrangement with Starbucks to market and distribute<br />

the brand worldwide<br />

While not popular in the US, these products<br />

benefit from a brand umbrella in ground coffee<br />

or are a niche offering with a historically older<br />

consumer and not supported by advertising/<br />

consumer promotions, giving rise to attractive<br />

margins<br />

Manufacturing scale and route distribution<br />

efficiency, sourced from carbonated soda<br />

partners (e.g. Starbucks/Pepsi) are the<br />

foundation for attractive brand leverage and<br />

profits

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!