The New Paradigm - Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

FrontierCentreforPublicPolicy
from FrontierCentreforPublicPolicy More from this publisher
09.10.2018 Views

4 Exhibit 1 The U.S. Economy: Gaining Momentum in the ’90s By virtually any measure—GDP growth, unemployment, national wealth, inflation and more—the U.S. economy performed better in the ’90s than it had in decades. Some say the good times can’t continue. But a deluge of new technologies and industries made possible by the microprocessor has only begun to reshape the economy. 25 20 15 10 5 0 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 350 300 250 200 150 100 50 0 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 Percent Percent Percent Percent Growth in GDP per Worker 1970s 1980s 1990s End-of-Decade Unemployment Rate 1970s 1980s 1990s Change in Dow Jones Industrial Average 1970s 1980s 1990s Increase in Consumer Prices 1970s 1980s 1990s Times this good defy traditional economic analysis. For at least the past five decades, conventional wisdom held that a free market economy couldn’t long sustain strong growth, a low jobless rate and stable prices. Economists emphasized trade-offs—between unemployment and inflation, between price stability and growth. When the economy started to percolate, the thinking went, surging demand would create supply bottlenecks and rising wages would ignite inflationary pressures. Indeed, economic orthodoxy fixated on a “natural rate” of unemployment—somewhere between 5.5 percent and 6.5 percent—below which the economy couldn’t go without escalating inflation. Once the inflationary genie was out of the bottle, the remedy was to brake the economy, which meant fewer new jobs and more layoffs. The dismal science reached another dismal judgment: good times can’t last because prosperity sows the seeds of its own demise. To avoid ruinous cycles of boom and bust, the best a mature economy can do is plod along at a growth rate of 2.5 percent a year. Traditional theories are at a loss to explain the 1990s. They miss the mark because of sweeping changes in the U.S. economy. Over the past two decades, a new economy has emerged from a spurt of invention and innovation, led by the microprocessor. These thumbnail-size devices serve as the “brains” for computers and thousands of other products, some as cutting edge as Doppler radar, others as mundane as a musical birthday card. The microprocessor’s ability to manipulate, store and move vast amounts of information shifted the economy’s center of gravity, creating the era of smaller, faster, smarter, better, cheaper. The microprocessor’s myriad spillovers magnify its impact. The microchip ignited wave after wave of invention and innovation. New technologies and new products burst forth, a modern-day alchemy spinning silicon into gold. The microprocessor and its spillovers forged an Information Age infrastructure of ever more powerful and affordable computers, increasingly complex software, data-dense fiber-optic networks, cellular telephones, satellite communications, laser scanners and the ubiquitous Internet. What’s different about the New Economy? There’s an unbridled dynamism, flowing from an entrepreneurial cap- 1999 ANNUAL REPORT Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas

5 Exhibit 2 Technology Spillovers: Increasing Returns and Decreasing Costs Even when individual industries face decreasing returns to scale, the economy as a whole may enjoy increasing returns when technology spillovers from one industry benefit others. Technology spillovers are especially abundant with mother lode inventions, whose applications spread far and wide. Innovation in one company—though intended solely for internal benefit—can spark innovation in others, triggering a powerful, economy-wide cascading effect not unlike alchemy. Revolutionary technologies can take decades to spawn all their spillovers, during which, for all practical purposes, aggregate returns to scale increase. ■ Texas Instruments was trying to reduce the size of electronic circuitry when engineer Jack Kilby developed the integrated circuit in 1958. The benefits of that innovation far exceeded what TI could internalize, opening a whole new science in which electronic circuitry would shrink to sizes once thought unachievable. ■ Intel was pursuing circuitry small enough for a pocket calculator when Ted Hoff developed the silicon-etching process that ultimately led to the microprocessor. A 1971 ad in Electronic News heralded the “computer on a chip” and signaled the start of the digital age. ■ In seeking to make microprocessors ever smaller, IBM developed the scanning tunneling microscope. The benefits of that research, however, went far beyond what was envisioned. The microscope enabled an entirely new industry—nanotechnology—that promises to deliver molecularly engineered materials that will reshape our world. Economist Joseph Schumpeter clearly understood the economics of spillovers: “Most of us seem here to commit a mistake in handling the concept of decreasing returns. In its proper sense it applies only to given production functions and generally stationary conditions.“ —Business Cycles, Vol. 2 “Whenever…a given quantity of output costs less to produce than…before, we may be sure…that there has been innovation somewhere. It need not necessarily have occurred in the industry under observation, which may be only applying, or benefitting from, an innovation that has occurred in another.” —Business Cycles, Vol. 1 “We are just now in the down grade of a wave of enterprise that created the electrical power plant, the electrical industry, the electrified farm and the motorcar….The mere utilization of the achievement of the age of electricity…would suffice to provide investment opportunities for quite a time to come.” —Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy italism. A novel idea and a little money can spark a billiondollar business almost overnight. Yesterday’s economy was dominated by establishment capitalism, with high barriers to entry that disadvantaged newcomers and new products. Economic change occurred at a slower pace. In the New Economy, knowledge is more important to economic success than money or machinery. Modern tools facilitate the application of brainpower, not muscle or machine power, opening all sectors of the economy to productivity gains. The Industrial Age ran on physical plant and equipment. Rapid productivity growth was the province of manufacturing, a shrinking segment of the economy for four decades. Scarcity, the first assumption of the old economy, isn’t the dominant feature of the New Economy. Many of today’s markets are awash with goods and services. Sellers compete aggressively for buyers. They discount. They cut costs. They expand markets through relentless promotion and advertising. Increasing returns to scale pervade the New Economy. More of today’s companies and industries thrive on quantity discounts—the higher the demand, the lower the price. Decreasing returns to scale dominated the old economy, so producing more goods and services pushed prices up. (See Exhibit 2.) Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas 1999 ANNUAL REPORT

4<br />

Exhibit 1<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. Economy:<br />

Gaining Momentum in the ’90s<br />

By virtually any measure—GDP growth, unemployment, national<br />

wealth, inflation and more—the U.S. economy performed better<br />

in the ’90s than it had in decades. Some say the good times<br />

can’t continue. But a deluge <strong>of</strong> new technologies and industries<br />

made possible by the microprocessor has only begun to reshape<br />

the economy.<br />

25<br />

20<br />

15<br />

10<br />

5<br />

0<br />

7<br />

6<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

350<br />

300<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

120<br />

100<br />

80<br />

60<br />

40<br />

20<br />

0<br />

Percent<br />

Percent<br />

Percent<br />

Percent<br />

Growth in GDP per Worker<br />

1970s 1980s 1990s<br />

End-<strong>of</strong>-Decade Unemployment Rate<br />

1970s 1980s 1990s<br />

Change in Dow Jones Industrial Average<br />

1970s 1980s 1990s<br />

Increase in Consumer Prices<br />

1970s 1980s 1990s<br />

Times this good defy traditional economic analysis. For<br />

at least the past five decades, conventional wisdom held<br />

that a free market economy couldn’t long sustain strong<br />

growth, a low jobless rate and stable prices. Economists<br />

emphasized trade-<strong>of</strong>fs—between unemployment and<br />

inflation, between price stability and growth.<br />

When the economy started to percolate, the thinking<br />

went, surging demand would create supply bottlenecks<br />

and rising wages would ignite inflationary pressures.<br />

Indeed, economic orthodoxy fixated on a “natural rate” <strong>of</strong><br />

unemployment—somewhere between 5.5 percent and 6.5<br />

percent—below which the economy couldn’t go without<br />

escalating inflation. Once the inflationary genie was out <strong>of</strong><br />

the bottle, the remedy was to brake the economy, which<br />

meant fewer new jobs and more lay<strong>of</strong>fs. <strong>The</strong> dismal science<br />

reached another dismal judgment: good times can’t<br />

last because prosperity sows the seeds <strong>of</strong> its own demise.<br />

To avoid ruinous cycles <strong>of</strong> boom and bust, the best a<br />

mature economy can do is plod along at a growth rate <strong>of</strong><br />

2.5 percent a year.<br />

Traditional theories are at a loss to explain the 1990s.<br />

<strong>The</strong>y miss the mark because <strong>of</strong> sweeping changes in the<br />

U.S. economy. Over the past two decades, a new economy<br />

has emerged from a spurt <strong>of</strong> invention and innovation, led<br />

by the microprocessor. <strong>The</strong>se thumbnail-size devices serve<br />

as the “brains” for computers and thousands <strong>of</strong> other products,<br />

some as cutting edge as Doppler radar, others as<br />

mundane as a musical birthday card. <strong>The</strong> microprocessor’s<br />

ability to manipulate, store and move vast amounts <strong>of</strong><br />

information shifted the economy’s center <strong>of</strong> gravity, creating<br />

the era <strong>of</strong> smaller, faster, smarter, better, cheaper.<br />

<strong>The</strong> microprocessor’s myriad spillovers magnify its<br />

impact. <strong>The</strong> microchip ignited wave after wave <strong>of</strong> invention<br />

and innovation. <strong>New</strong> technologies and new products<br />

burst forth, a modern-day alchemy spinning silicon into<br />

gold. <strong>The</strong> microprocessor and its spillovers forged an Information<br />

Age infrastructure <strong>of</strong> ever more powerful and<br />

affordable computers, increasingly complex s<strong>of</strong>tware,<br />

data-dense fiber-optic networks, cellular telephones, satellite<br />

communications, laser scanners and the ubiquitous<br />

Internet.<br />

What’s different about the <strong>New</strong> Economy? <strong>The</strong>re’s an<br />

unbridled dynamism, flowing from an entrepreneurial cap-<br />

1999 ANNUAL REPORT <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Reserve</strong> <strong>Bank</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Dallas</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!