Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
The greatest philosophv- in the world <strong>to</strong>cby* is that of dialectical<br />
materialism—the idea that it is ineviuble that >*"r are being earned <strong>to</strong>vw-aid<br />
sociahsm.The books that have been unnen up <strong>to</strong> no^- ha\r noc succeeded<br />
in countering this thesis. You must ^Titc ne>*' books. You must think of<br />
these problems. It is ideas that disanguish men horn animals. This is the<br />
human quality- of man. But according <strong>to</strong> the ideas of the socialists (he<br />
opportunitv' <strong>to</strong> have ideas should be reserved <strong>to</strong> the Bobtburo onh*; all the<br />
other people should only carry- out what the Pobtburo tells them <strong>to</strong> do.<br />
It is impossible <strong>to</strong> defeat a philosophy- if yx>u do noc fight in the<br />
philosophical field. One of the great defiaenaes of Amencan thinking<br />
and America is the most important country- m the \%x>rld because it is here,<br />
not in Moscow, that this problem n^tII be decided—the greatest short-<br />
coming. IS that people think all these philosophies and e\rrvihing that is<br />
written in books is of minor importance, that it doesn't count. Thefrtbre<br />
they underrate the imporunce and the power of ideas. Yet thetr b nothing<br />
more imporunt in the \%-orid than ideas Ideas and rKXhmg else will<br />
determine the outcome ot'this great stru|qc)c It is a great mistake <strong>to</strong> bebevr<br />
that the outcome of the batde will be determined bs thingi other than Kleas.<br />
Russian Marxists, like all iKher Marxists, had the idea that they v^-anted<br />
<strong>to</strong> nationalize agriculture. That is. the theorists wanted <strong>to</strong>—the indnndual<br />
worker did not want <strong>to</strong> nationalize the tarnn. tho' wanted <strong>to</strong> t&ke the big<br />
farms, break them up. and distribute the land among the snuU tarmen This<br />
has been called "agrarian reform '" The ux lal res-olutKNunes wanted <strong>to</strong><br />
distribute the tarim <strong>to</strong> the p*xn peasants In I** P. lenin coined a new<br />
slt>gan. "You nuke re\x>lution \Mih the slogan iM the d*y** Thetrlbfv,<br />
they accepted something that was against <strong>Marxism</strong> Later thev started<br />
the nationalization i>t tarm land% Ihen the\ adofHed this idea in the<br />
new ct>untricN they tiH>k osrr. they <strong>to</strong>ld esery man that he would get his<br />
own tarm<br />
They ^tartcd this pnigram in (hiru In China they <strong>to</strong>ok the big fanm<br />
and abolished the rights i>f mortgage banks and landkwik and treed the<br />
tenantN tn>m making Am payment* ti> »he landkmis Therrfocr. it was not<br />
phiKnophy thai nude the ( hinev pca\ant\ iommunistu. but the pnmmr<br />
ot a better lite, people thought thes s%\>uld impnnr their londitxins it they<br />
could get some tarm land ossned up <strong>to</strong> then by v^ralthier people. But thai<br />
IS not the solution <strong>to</strong>r the Chinese pr\)b)em The adsTxates of this program<br />
werc called agricultural rrli>rmen. they v^rre ntH Marxians The idea of<br />
land distribution u entirely un-Marxun<br />
—