Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

( iiinoc
MARXISM AND THE MANIPULATION OF MAN
determine the fdsnuliH without entering into the meaning. And
meaning ittelf » an idea.
The Behaviortso' approach *ay%.**We will condition the other people."
I It who are the "we"? And who air the "other people?" "Today." they say,
"ople are conditioned for capitahun by mam* things, by history, by good
iple. by bad people, by the church, etc.. etc."
Thn phUotophy doem't give m an>* ansurr other than the answrr we
h .v-c already leen.The whole idea of ihn philoK>ph\' i* that \%r must accept
\% \iit Karl Marx told m became he had the great gi^—he was entrusted
b. Providence, by the material pnxluctiw force*, with diwovering the law
oi hmorual evolution He knou-* the end tou-jrd which hisiorv* leads
trunkind IhH lead% evniiuallv to the point where \%t muvt accept the idea
tl.Jt the party, the gnnip. the clique, that hat defeated the others b\' force
jrim. n the ri|^i ruler, that he i% called b>' the nuterial pmductivr forces
((• condition" all other people The fanutiu thing i% that the uhtx)! which
dr\rlop« this philo*oph>- calls itself "liberal " and call* its *\%tcin a "people's
drjiuKracy." "real democracy." and *o tm It u aKo fantastic that the Vice
President of the United State* (Menr>' Wallace. IKHH-rx.S) one day
ii i lared."We m the United Sutes have only a cis'il rights deiiuKracy—but
II Kusiua there is econcwitic detnocrac>'"
I ginning,
n;ere w»% a socialist author, s-alued highly b>' the liolshesiks in the
who uid the tmnt pouvrlul nun in the vstirld is the man in
hose favor the greatest lies are told itu\ behesrd (Something similar was
ul by Adolf Hitler ) Hcrv i» the pcmvr of this philosophy I he Russians
. 4\r the ptnsrr to sj>-."Wc are a deiiKHracy and our people arc lupp>' and
rnjo>' a full life under our s>itein "And cnher lutiom *eem to be unable tt>
liiul the right answrr to this idea If the>- had found the right answer, this
phihnophy vsxmldn't Ih- ui popular
Ihere are people living here in the United States, at an American
(andard of living, who think ihe> *rc unlupps' because the>' do not live in
»Niet Kussu wheir. they uy. there » a cbssless socien- and esrrything is
!>ctter than it is here Hut it seems that it is nc»t \rr> much fun to live in
Kussta. not only from the nuterial pc»int o( vieu. but fmm the point of
•rw of indmdual freedom If >t>u ask. "How is it possible that people
i\ exrrsthing is vsxMidertuI in a country. Russia, in which cvervthing is
probably not vrry WTsndertul." then \sy must ansAver. "Because our last
'Hree generanom wrre utuHe to explcxle the contradictions and the
iluirs of this philosophy of dialectic nuterialism."
47