Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

they say prices go up *'autonuticaIH'.'' But this doesn't mean that this is
done without human consciousness, v^-ithout some persons bidding and
offering. Prices go up precisely because people are anxious to acquire these
things. Nothing m the economic system happens "automatically."
Evervthmg happens because certain peof^e beha\r m a debmte >%"a>'.
Also the planners sa>'. "How can \x>u be so stupid as to adwxrate the
absence of planmng?" But no one advocates the absence of plan. The
question is not "Plan, or no plan." The quesQon is "Whose plan? The plan
of one dicutor onK'? Or the plan of marn* indrviduak?" ExrrvxMie plans.
He pbns to go to work: he plans to go home; he plam to read a book;
he plam a thousand other things. A "great" plan ehrmnates the plam of
evrrvixxK' else; then only one plan can be supreme. If the **grrat" plan
and the pbm of indi\iduak come into conflict, whose plan is to be
supreme' Who decides' The pobce decide! And ihe>- decide in fax-or otthe
"great" pbn
In the cari> dax's of tocialnm. some critics d'sooalxsm used to blame
socialists for their ignorarwe ol' human luturr A man who muse execute
the pbn of somebod>- eKe onK- v^THild fK> longer be a man ol* the kind
\%r call human This objection was amwrrrd b\ those socialists who said.
"If hunun nature n atpinsi socialism, then human ruture >%ill hasr to
be changed " Karl Kautskv said this mam van bchtre. but he didn't gnr
am details
I he detaiK s%rre pnnided b\ iiehasiiKism and b>- [l\'an| Pax-kiv
I IH4V 1 VV.), ihe psvchotogist mentMMK-d in rvrrv book b%' a Marxisi The
expbruiion s^-as t>fiered b% Pj\Un % (.ondiiMmed rrilex l*a>'kn- wm a
Ivartst. he nude hi^ experiments in the dj>-% ol the Tiar Instead ol' human
riglits. PasUn't ikig had lanine rights This t\ the fiiturr of educafKMi.
I hr llchasiortsi phikntipln wants to deal v^ith human indtsiduah as
It there wrrr iu» idea* t>r rH» faults in men BehasHHism ctnisKlers rvrry
hunun action a* a rra^tMm to a «tinmlus Ksrrsthing in the ph\%Kal and
ph\AU>l«^u al luturr rr»p«>fHK to (.ertain rrllexes rhe> ia\-."Man belongs to
the vtnir rraltii a« aninuK Whs should he be ditferent' There are certain
rrtlrxo and «rrtain in\tUKt^ that guide n>en to certain ends (lertatn
\itiiuili hnitg aKnit t,ertatn rraitHtm" What the IWhasionsts and the
MarMit\ did »uH %ee was that >\hi cannot e\m dtsiredit such a theory of
\tiinuli without entering into the meaning that the indisichial attaches to
Nuch ctinuili 1 he hi>utes%ife. when quoted the prwe ol an object which she
i\ coiiiidering bsiving. reacts cbHermth' to $.S than she does to $6. You