Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

MARXISM AND THE MANIPULATION OF MAN
Mane « philotophicd doctrinct became popular in that people became
r jmiliar with w>mc o( hi* tenm. ilof^am. and so forth, although they used
•hem diffcfcndy from ihc way thc>' wtrr med in the system of Karl Marx.
Such umplificaoon happcm lo many doctrines. For insunce, Darwinism
became known at the theory based on the idea that man is the grandson
. ,( an ape. What rrmams of Nietzsche is not much more than his term
superman." which bier acquired popuUrir\' in the United Sutes without
any connection to Nietzsche Regarding Marx, people know his terms but
they use them very loosely But b>' and large. Marxian ideas have little or
DO oppoitoon.
One €t( the rrasom why the doctrine of Marx was so diluted in the
piibltc mind was the wa>- hngels tried tt> explain Marxian thcor\-. See
Ins sutemeni at the grasrsidc of Marx: "Marx disccnrrrd the law of
tnankmd's historical e\x»luiion. le, the simple fact, hitherto hidden
l>cneach ideological ovrrgnnAths. that men must first of all eat. drink,
have sheher and clothing befoir the>- an pursue politics, science, art,
religion. M>d the like"* Yet m» one e\rr denied this Hut now if someone
sjys something against Marxun liiKinne then thcN* can be asked: "How
1 an you be s«» stupid as to denv thai one must fit\t eai before one becomes
a philos«>phef*"
Again there is the ihet»ry c»f the nuierul pn>duciisr forces. But no
explanation is offetrd for their fornutton Dialectical materialism states
tlui the nuierial pnsductisf femes lomc tt> ihc \st>rld—one doesn't know
hosi^' they some, nor whetr ilies tome fn»m—and it is ihcsc material
pncxluctivr fortes ihat crrafe esxTMhinj: civc. i c . the superstructure.
IVople KMiietimes beliesr ihai there has been a vrr> sharp conflict
between the various chunhes and Marxism The>* consider Marxism and
\ocialitm as incompatible with the teachinp of all Chriscian churches and
vecti. The earf the Hible in general, and of the book
t>f Acti especially \X/e d*>n*i knosv much about these early communist sects
but they existed in the Muklle Ages and alst» in the early years of the
Refbmunon All these seits \srrr in conflict with the established doctrines
•^ (FnedrKh El^irK. '^Mxvh at the C.mr ol KaH .Vljrx." Highpic Ccnictcn. London.
Maith 17. 1883 (a vrruon oi thn cuk^tx «« pubhvhcd in the novspapcr Li Justice,
Mtfch 20. I883>~E