Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Parliamentary Commissions. He didn't c\'cn sec what was going on in his
own neighborhood. He didn't see that mam- people were fightmg. not for
the interests of the proletarut, but for the prmciplcs of nanonahrv'.
Marx completely ignored this principle of nadonalitN.The principle of
nationality asked that every Unguisoc group form an independent state and
that all the members of such a group should be recognized and unified.
This was the principle which brought about the European condicts, led to
the complete destruction of the European sN-stem. and created the present-
day chaos in Europe. The prinaple of nanonaht\- doesn't take into account
that there are large territories in which Imguisac popuboons aie mixed.
Consequendy there urre struggles bet>%ren the x-anous lingutsoc groups
which finally resulted in the situation ur ha\T toda>' in Europe. I nienaon
this because it is a principle of go\rmment which wn unknom-n up to
now.
According to this principle iherr is no sinh nation as Indu It is
possible that this principle of nationalit> %%-ill break Indu up into many
independent states fighting one amxhcr The Indian Paritament uses
the English language. The members of the various states cannot
communicate with one another, other than b>' employing the language of
the government, a language which the> ha\r practKaUy expelled 6om
their country. But this Mtuatu>n will not last kKe\TT
In 1K4K. when the Sb\-\ of Eun>pc met for a PuuUvM Congmi ill
Moscow, thcs had to speak with t>ne another m Ctcmvui. But this dKki^
prevent later developments in a dirterenf wa\
Karl Marx and EngrU didn't like the natiottalistK nKuremeni and never
took notice of it. It didn't fit into their plans ix Khcmet If. on account of
the unfriendly renurk\ Marx and KngeK nude about vanoui hngutsoc
groups of Austria! lun^ars and the lialkam. sonic authorv eif>ecully
French aiithorv. think Marx was a torrninncr ol Natiocul Soculam—
Na/ism—thev arc wn>M^ Marx said that what he wanted was to cfracr i
one-world state And that was Icnin's idea too
By 1 848 Marx had alrradv assumed that soculnm was just aiound the
corner. C liven such a theorv. therr was no reason to Ibrm a scpantr
linguistic state Such a state ».ould onlv be srr>' tcnyorary Marx simplf
assumed th.it the a^e »>! lutioiuliiies vsxmid t »»mc to an end, and that we
were on the eve of an age in whuh there \%x>uld no lon|crr be dittcfrfKCt
between various t>-pes. classes, nations, hngutsoc gtoufH. etc. Mm
absolutely denied anv ditfercnces among men Men «MMild aO be of the