Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
NATIONALISM. SOCIALISM. AND VIOLENT REVOLUTION<br />
:"^,^"^! ''l^.r"^ "^^ ^*^-^' b"t also on other authors. Georges<br />
Sorcl (1847-19221—not <strong>to</strong> be confUsed with Albert Sorel [1842-19061-<br />
an .mporum hmorun, developed a philosophy in many respects different<br />
<strong>from</strong> the Marxian phUosophy. And it influenced poHtical action and<br />
phUowphic thinking. Sorel was a timid bourgeois inteUectual, an engineer<br />
He rrorcd <strong>to</strong> discuss these things with his friends at a bookshop owned by<br />
Charie* Peguy |1873-1914]. a revolutionary socialist. In the course of the<br />
years. Peguy changed his opinions and at the end of his Ufe he was a very<br />
ardent C:aihoIic author. Peguy had serious conflicts with his family Peguy<br />
was remarkable for his intercourse with Sorel. Peguy was a man of action;<br />
he died in acuon in 1914 in the first weeks of the war.<br />
SorrI belonged psychologically <strong>to</strong> the group of people who dream of<br />
at tion but never act; he didn't fight. As a writer, however, Sorel was very<br />
aggressive. He praised cruelty and deplored the fact that cruelty is more<br />
and more disappearing fmm our life. In one of his books. Reflections on<br />
I lolrtur, he considered it a manifestation of decay that Marxian parties,<br />
calling themselves revolutionary, had degenerated in<strong>to</strong> parliamentary<br />
parties. Where is the revolution if you are in Parhament? He also didn't Hke<br />
labor unions. He thought the labor unions should abandon the hopeless<br />
venture of seeking higher wage rates and should adopt, instead of this<br />
conservative pattern, the revolutionary process.<br />
Sorel saw clearly the contradiction in the system of Marx who spoke<br />
of revolution on the one hand and then said, "The coming of socialism<br />
I* inevitable, and you cannot accelerate its coming because socialism<br />
cannot come before the material productive forces have achieved all that<br />
IS possible within the frame of the old society." Sorel saw that this idea<br />
of inevitability was contradic<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong> the idea of revolution. This is the<br />
contradiction all socialists ask themselves about—Kautsky, for one. Sorel<br />
completely adopted the idea of revolution.<br />
Sorel asked of the labor unions a new tactic, action directs—amck,<br />
destroy, sabotage. He considered these aggressive policies only preliminary<br />
<strong>to</strong> the great day when the unions would declare a "general strike." That<br />
is the day when the unions will declare "Now we don't work at all.<br />
We want <strong>to</strong> destroy the life of the nation completely." General strike is<br />
only a synonym for the live revolution. The idea of action directe is<br />
called "syndicalism."<br />
Syndicalism can mean ownership of the industry by the workers.<br />
Socialists mean bv this term ownership by the state and operation for the<br />
account of the people. Sorel wanted <strong>to</strong> attain this by revolution. He didn't<br />
29