17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

NATIONALISM. SOCIALISM. AND VIOLENT REVOLUTION<br />

:"^,^"^! ''l^.r"^ "^^ ^*^-^' b"t also on other authors. Georges<br />

Sorcl (1847-19221—not <strong>to</strong> be confUsed with Albert Sorel [1842-19061-<br />

an .mporum hmorun, developed a philosophy in many respects different<br />

<strong>from</strong> the Marxian phUosophy. And it influenced poHtical action and<br />

phUowphic thinking. Sorel was a timid bourgeois inteUectual, an engineer<br />

He rrorcd <strong>to</strong> discuss these things with his friends at a bookshop owned by<br />

Charie* Peguy |1873-1914]. a revolutionary socialist. In the course of the<br />

years. Peguy changed his opinions and at the end of his Ufe he was a very<br />

ardent C:aihoIic author. Peguy had serious conflicts with his family Peguy<br />

was remarkable for his intercourse with Sorel. Peguy was a man of action;<br />

he died in acuon in 1914 in the first weeks of the war.<br />

SorrI belonged psychologically <strong>to</strong> the group of people who dream of<br />

at tion but never act; he didn't fight. As a writer, however, Sorel was very<br />

aggressive. He praised cruelty and deplored the fact that cruelty is more<br />

and more disappearing fmm our life. In one of his books. Reflections on<br />

I lolrtur, he considered it a manifestation of decay that Marxian parties,<br />

calling themselves revolutionary, had degenerated in<strong>to</strong> parliamentary<br />

parties. Where is the revolution if you are in Parhament? He also didn't Hke<br />

labor unions. He thought the labor unions should abandon the hopeless<br />

venture of seeking higher wage rates and should adopt, instead of this<br />

conservative pattern, the revolutionary process.<br />

Sorel saw clearly the contradiction in the system of Marx who spoke<br />

of revolution on the one hand and then said, "The coming of socialism<br />

I* inevitable, and you cannot accelerate its coming because socialism<br />

cannot come before the material productive forces have achieved all that<br />

IS possible within the frame of the old society." Sorel saw that this idea<br />

of inevitability was contradic<strong>to</strong>ry <strong>to</strong> the idea of revolution. This is the<br />

contradiction all socialists ask themselves about—Kautsky, for one. Sorel<br />

completely adopted the idea of revolution.<br />

Sorel asked of the labor unions a new tactic, action directs—amck,<br />

destroy, sabotage. He considered these aggressive policies only preliminary<br />

<strong>to</strong> the great day when the unions would declare a "general strike." That<br />

is the day when the unions will declare "Now we don't work at all.<br />

We want <strong>to</strong> destroy the life of the nation completely." General strike is<br />

only a synonym for the live revolution. The idea of action directe is<br />

called "syndicalism."<br />

Syndicalism can mean ownership of the industry by the workers.<br />

Socialists mean bv this term ownership by the state and operation for the<br />

account of the people. Sorel wanted <strong>to</strong> attain this by revolution. He didn't<br />

29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!