Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

microbes to exploit. The bourgeoisie don't need any justification. Their
class consciousness shows them that they have to do this; it is the
capitalist s nature to exploit.
A Russian friend of Marx wrote him that the task of the sociahsts
must be to help the bourgeoisie exploit better and Marx replied that that
was not necessar\'. Marx then uTOie a shon note saying that Russia
could reach socialism without going through the capitahst stage. The
next morning he must have realized that, if he adimtted that one countrv
could skip one of the inevitable stages, this w>x>uld destrxn' hi<
whole theory. So he didn't send the note. Engels. who was not so bright,
discovered this piece of paper in the desk of Karl Marx, copied it in his
own handwriting, and sent his cop\' to Vera Zasulich (I849-!9I9|, who
was famous in Russia because she had anempted to assasunate the l\>hcc
Commissioner in St. Petersburg and been acquined b>- the jury—she had
a good defense counsel. This \%x)rrun published Mane's note, and it
became one of the great assets of the BoUhe\-ik Party.
The capitalist s\-stem is a s>-sfem in which promooon is pirciselx
according to merit If people do not get ahead, there is bitterness in thru
minds The>' arc reluctant co admit thai the%' do not ad\'ance because of
their lack of intelligence The> take their bck o( ad\*ancemem out ou
society. Many blame wxierv and turn to uxialism This tetKlenc>' i*
especially strt>ng in the rank* ot intellectuaK Because pn>fessionals irrji
each other a% equals, the less capaNe professionak consider themseKrx
"superior" to non- professionals and tecl ihrv desersr more recognition
than ihcv receive Fn\A pb\^ an important role There i* a philu>phual
prciliNpoMtion among prrvom to be dtssatislied with the existing state t>f
atfairs There is dissjtntaaion. aluv with polituaJ conditions If you are
dissatisfied, vou ask what other kind of uaie can be considered
Marx had "anti-talent"— i c . a lack i>l talent He s»-as influenced b\
Hcgcl and f ciicrbath. r*petiallv b\ FruerKKh'% critique of C'hritCianttv
Marx admitted that the exploitation doitnne was taken from an
anonvmoiis pamphlet publuhed in the I82m |l>avid) Ruardo (1772-1823) *
Marx was econt>muallv ignorant, he didn't rraliie that there can be
doubts coiucrning the best means of productKMi to be applied. The big
4 \(h,thr l\jn.iplr^ .y /W.f^j/ I .^^my tmd TsMMwm (landon )dtm Mlli y . I«2I (llllTp |