17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

"""'"""^"'" '"^ "^ —TM« KBVO.UT.ON<br />

and rhar of sbvcs and serfs was o^nly that the cap.tahst had no obi gat on<br />

<strong>to</strong> care for workers who were no longer exploitable, wh.le the iTrd<br />

was bound <strong>to</strong> care for slaves and serfs. This is another of the insoluble<br />

contradictions ,n the Marxian system. Yet it is accepted by many<br />

rconomms <strong>to</strong>day without realizing of what this contradiction consists<br />

According <strong>to</strong> Marx, capitalism is a necessary and inevitable stage in<br />

the his<strong>to</strong>ry of mankind leading men <strong>from</strong> primitive conditions <strong>to</strong> the<br />

inillennium of socialism. If capitalism is a necessary and mevitable step on<br />

the road <strong>to</strong> socialism, then one cannot consistently claim, <strong>from</strong> the point<br />

of view of Marx, that what the capitalist does is ethically and morally<br />

bad. Therefore, why does Marx attack the capitalists?<br />

Marx says part of production is appropriated by the capitalists and<br />

withheld <strong>from</strong> the workers. According <strong>to</strong> Marx, this is very bad. The<br />

I onscquence is that the workers are no longer in a position <strong>to</strong> consume<br />

the whole production produced. A part of what they have produced,<br />

therefore, remains unconsumed; there is "underconsumption." For this<br />

reason, because there is underconsumption, economic depressions occur<br />

regularly. This is the Marxian underconsumption theory of depressions.<br />

Yet Marx contradicts this theory elsewhere.<br />

Marxian writers do not explain why production proceeds <strong>from</strong><br />

simpler <strong>to</strong> more and more complicated methods.<br />

Nor did Marx mention the following fact: About 1700, the<br />

population of (Ircat Britain was about five and a half million; by the<br />

middle of the 17(M)s. the population was six and a half million, about<br />

.S(K),(MH) of whom were simply destitute. The whole economic system<br />

had produced a "surplus" population. The surplus population problem<br />

appeared earlier in Great Britain than in continental Europe. This<br />

happened, first of all. because Great Britain was an island and so was not<br />

subject <strong>to</strong> invasion by foreign armies, which helped <strong>to</strong> reduce the popu-<br />

lations in Europe. The wars in Great Britain were civil wars, which were<br />

bad. but they s<strong>to</strong>pped. And then this outlet for the surplus population<br />

disappeared, so the numbers of surplus people grew. In Europe the situ-<br />

ation was different; for one thing, the opportunity <strong>to</strong> work in agriculture<br />

was more favorable than in England.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!