Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
"""'"""^"'" '"^ "^ —TM« KBVO.UT.ON<br />
and rhar of sbvcs and serfs was o^nly that the cap.tahst had no obi gat on<br />
<strong>to</strong> care for workers who were no longer exploitable, wh.le the iTrd<br />
was bound <strong>to</strong> care for slaves and serfs. This is another of the insoluble<br />
contradictions ,n the Marxian system. Yet it is accepted by many<br />
rconomms <strong>to</strong>day without realizing of what this contradiction consists<br />
According <strong>to</strong> Marx, capitalism is a necessary and inevitable stage in<br />
the his<strong>to</strong>ry of mankind leading men <strong>from</strong> primitive conditions <strong>to</strong> the<br />
inillennium of socialism. If capitalism is a necessary and mevitable step on<br />
the road <strong>to</strong> socialism, then one cannot consistently claim, <strong>from</strong> the point<br />
of view of Marx, that what the capitalist does is ethically and morally<br />
bad. Therefore, why does Marx attack the capitalists?<br />
Marx says part of production is appropriated by the capitalists and<br />
withheld <strong>from</strong> the workers. According <strong>to</strong> Marx, this is very bad. The<br />
I onscquence is that the workers are no longer in a position <strong>to</strong> consume<br />
the whole production produced. A part of what they have produced,<br />
therefore, remains unconsumed; there is "underconsumption." For this<br />
reason, because there is underconsumption, economic depressions occur<br />
regularly. This is the Marxian underconsumption theory of depressions.<br />
Yet Marx contradicts this theory elsewhere.<br />
Marxian writers do not explain why production proceeds <strong>from</strong><br />
simpler <strong>to</strong> more and more complicated methods.<br />
Nor did Marx mention the following fact: About 1700, the<br />
population of (Ircat Britain was about five and a half million; by the<br />
middle of the 17(M)s. the population was six and a half million, about<br />
.S(K),(MH) of whom were simply destitute. The whole economic system<br />
had produced a "surplus" population. The surplus population problem<br />
appeared earlier in Great Britain than in continental Europe. This<br />
happened, first of all. because Great Britain was an island and so was not<br />
subject <strong>to</strong> invasion by foreign armies, which helped <strong>to</strong> reduce the popu-<br />
lations in Europe. The wars in Great Britain were civil wars, which were<br />
bad. but they s<strong>to</strong>pped. And then this outlet for the surplus population<br />
disappeared, so the numbers of surplus people grew. In Europe the situ-<br />
ation was different; for one thing, the opportunity <strong>to</strong> work in agriculture<br />
was more favorable than in England.