Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

the coming of socialism vm inevitable; it ^\T>uld come with the
inevitability of nature.
On the one hand, Karl Marx wrote of die inevitabihtY of sodalisni.
But on the other hand, he organized a socialist mowment, a socialist
party, declared again and again that his socialism was rrvoludocury, and
that the violent overthro\\- of the govrmment ym necessary* to bnng
about socialism.
Marx borrowed his meuphors from the 6eld of gynecology. The
socialist party is hke obstetrics. Marx said; it makes the coming of socialism
possible. When asked if \x)u consider the whole process me\ntabte. why do
you not favor evolution instead of rn'olutum. the Marxists rrply. "There are
no evolutions in life. Is not birth itself a rr>x>luaon?"
According to Marx, the goal of the socialist parry was not to inBuence,
but only to help the ine\iuble. But obstetrics itself influences and changes
conditions. Obstetrics has actually brought about pnigren m this branch
of medicine, and c\rn vi\rd 1i\ts. And b>' vi\ing bvrs it could be said
obstetrics has actually changed the course o( hntory.
The term "scientitic" acquired presoge during the course of the
nineteenth century. Engeb' Anh'l^)tiknit]i (1878) became one of the most
successful books among the writinp of phiknophical Marxno. One
chapter in this book wa% rrpnmed as a pamphlet under the title "The
Development of Stxulism from Utopu to Science.** and it had enormous
success. Karl Kadek (IHMS-W.W). a Soviet Cocnmunnt, later Htoce a
pamphlet called "The I )c\rU>pmen! ol Vxialtsm. (torn Soence to ActXNi.**
Marx'% dextrine of ideologv was conctxted to dacrrdit the v^Tinngi of
the btnirgetmie |Tomis) Mavir>k |lHf>-!937| of Oechoskn-aku wm
born ot ptnir pcttplc. farmers and >*x>rker\. and he wrote about Marxism.
Yet the Marxiaiu called him a bourgeois Havv could he be considered
"bourgcoi\" if Marx and Engeb called thentiehrs "proletarun**?
U the pmletartan\ mu*t think ai cording to the "interests" o4* their cU»,
what doc% It mean if there arr di\agrrrmem« and dt%sent among them' The
confusion iiuke\ the situation \rrv difficult to expiun When there it
dissent among prx>letariam. the> call a dmenter a "social traitor" After
Marx and EngeU. the great nun o( the (lommunnts w» a (fertiun. Karl
Kautsky |lHr>4-lW3H| In IV17. when Lenin tned to revolutXNiiie die
whole \\x>rld. Karl Kautskv was opposed to the idea And because of thn
divagreement. the former great nun t>l the party became owmiKhc i
"social traitor." and he was called that as s»tU as many other
16