17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CLASS co.,ucr^ ,„,,,„„^^^^ ^^^^^^_^^<br />

production. He didn't realize that the maf^r;.i r . r ,<br />

b^cX co" r""' '\' ""^"^^^ P"'""^^^ ^--^'<br />

about --ably^<br />

the coming of socialism. His theory has been caUed<br />

matenalum,<br />

"dialectiS<br />

abbreviated by the socialists <strong>to</strong> "diamet<br />

(In an as.de. Dr. M.ses <strong>to</strong>ld of visiting a school in Mexico, an "escuela<br />

^ul«u. a Wuhst school." Mises asked the school's M;xican dean<br />

what KKi^m school" meant. The dean explained that Mexican law<br />

required Khools <strong>to</strong> teach the Darwiman doctrine of evolution and<br />

diaJecacaJ materuhsm.Then he commented on the provision in the law<br />

making this requirement and on the school system itself: "There is a<br />

great difference between the letter of the law and the practice Ninety<br />

percent of the teachers m our schools are female and most of them are<br />

practicing Catholics.")<br />

Marx reasoned <strong>from</strong> the thesis <strong>to</strong> the negation of the thesis <strong>to</strong> the<br />

tifXaiion of the negation. Private ownership of the means of production by<br />

every individual worker was the beginning, the thesis.This was the state of<br />

affairs in a society in which every worker was either an independent<br />

farmer or an anisan who owned the <strong>to</strong>ols with which he was working.<br />

Negation of the f/i«M—ownership under capitalism—when the <strong>to</strong>ols were<br />

no longer owned by the workers, but by the capitalists. Negation of the<br />

negation was ownership of the means of production by the whole society.<br />

Keasoning in this way. Marx said he had discovered the law of his<strong>to</strong>rical<br />

evolution. And that is why he called it "scientific socialism."<br />

Marx branded all previous socialists "u<strong>to</strong>pian socialists" because they<br />

tried <strong>to</strong> point out why socialism was better. They wanted <strong>to</strong> convince their<br />

fellow citizens <strong>to</strong> their view because they expected people would adopt<br />

the socialist social system if they were convinced it was better. They were<br />

"U<strong>to</strong>pians." Marx said, because they tried <strong>to</strong> describe the future earthly<br />

paradise. Among the forerunners of Marx whom he considered "U<strong>to</strong>pians"<br />

were Saint-Sinion. a French aris<strong>to</strong>crat; Robert Owen [1757-1858], a<br />

British manufacturer; and Charles Fourier [1772-1837], a Frenchman<br />

who was without doubt a lunatic. (Fourier was called the "fou [fool] du<br />

Palais- Royal." He used <strong>to</strong> make such statements as "In the age of socialism,<br />

the ocean will no longer be salt but lemonade.") Marx considered these<br />

three as great forerunners. But, he said, they didn't realize that what they<br />

were saying was just "u<strong>to</strong>pian." They expected the coming of socialism<br />

because of a change in the opinions of the people. But for Marx,<br />

"

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!