17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

an interest and that men must act according <strong>to</strong> their interests.<br />

Two questions must be asked: (1) To^-ard what ultinute ends do these<br />

"interests" lead people? (2) What methods do the\' v^-ant <strong>to</strong> appK* in order<br />

<strong>to</strong> reach these ends?<br />

The First International v>-2s a smaD group of people, a committee of a<br />

few men in London, friends and enemies of Kax\ Marx. Someone<br />

suggested that they- cooperate uith the Bntish labor-union movrtnent. In<br />

1 865, Karl Marx read at the meeong of the Intenutional Committee, a<br />

paper. Value, Price, and Profit, one of his few untings ongmalK- written m<br />

En^ish. In this paper, he pointed out that the methods of the union mo\r-<br />

ment were verv- bad and must be changed. Paraphrasing: **The unions u-ant<br />

<strong>to</strong> improve the fate of the \%x)rkers >%ithin the framework of the capitalist<br />

system—this is hopeless and useless. Within the framework of the capitalist<br />

system there is no possibilirv oi improving the state of the WTMkers. The<br />

best the union could achiesr in this wa\ wtMild be some short-term<br />

success. The unions must abandon this 'comcrvatnr* pobcy; the\' imnt<br />

adopt the re\x>lutionarv' pt>lic> The\- must frghf for the jboliaon of the<br />

NV'age socierv* as such and \%T)rk for the conung ol* socialism.** Marx didn't<br />

have the courage <strong>to</strong> puNish chis paper during his litirtime. it w» puNtshed<br />

only after his death b> one ot his daughters He didn't want <strong>to</strong> antagonue<br />

the labor unions, he still had hopes the> s%\>uld abandon their theor>-<br />

Here is an obvious conflict ol' optniocn among ifae prolctanam<br />

ihcinsclves i oncerning the right meam <strong>to</strong> use The pnsletartan unions ai>d<br />

Marx di\jgrced as ci» what wa* in the "inteirsc" ol' the pn>letaruns Marx<br />

said that the "interrst" til a ilas% was i>b\-HHts—therr coukl be no doubt<br />

ab*nic It—e\rrvt>iic \%\>uld krniw it Then hetr conies a nun who docsn^<br />

l>cK>rig <strong>to</strong> this pmletarun class ai all. a v^Titrr and a Uwyrr who tdh<br />

the unums thr> ssrrr wnmg "This is bad p«iIk>.** he said. **You imiU<br />

Mdicallv ihangr \t>ur poluv" Heir the whole idea of the cIjm brraks<br />

doNN t). the ulcj that an individual nu\ unnetifnes err but that a cLim js «<br />

whole ».jn iicNTf err<br />

C>ituiMii\ ot Marxun dtxtrines hasr alwa>n brcn super6cul. They<br />

haven't {v>intcd t>ut h«ns Mars vontradicted himself and h

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!