17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

are not mpon^ble for all die nomense <strong>to</strong>day.<br />

What is die influence of dm Marxian doctrine on ideas? The<br />

philosopher Rene Descanes (1596-1650), who lived m die earH'<br />

seventeendi century; believrd that man had a mmd and that man thmks,<br />

but that animals were merely machines. Marx said, of course, Descartes<br />

lived m an age in which the "Manufakturpenoden," the <strong>to</strong>ok and<br />

machines, were such that he was forced <strong>to</strong> explain his theor\' by saving that<br />

animals were machines. Albrecht von Hailer (1708-1777), a Sv^iss,said the<br />

same thing m the eighteenth century (he didn't like liberal govmmient s<br />

equaht>' under law). Betwren these twT> men. lived de La Mettne, who also<br />

expbmed man as a machine. Therribrr, Marx's concept that ideas wnr a<br />

product of the <strong>to</strong>ob and machines of a particular era is easily dnpfpvcd<br />

John Locke (I632-17(MJ, the vkrll-knou-n philosopher of empiricism,<br />

declared that e\rrything in mens minds comes trom sensual experience<br />

Marx sa>-s John Locke %%-as a spokesman for the class doctrine oi the<br />

bourgeoisie This Icadi <strong>to</strong> hat) dilferrnt deductxms <strong>to</strong>om the v^Titings ot'<br />

Karl Marx: ( 1 ) The interpretation he fp\T <strong>to</strong> Descartes is that he was bvmg<br />

in an age when machines ^ftrrr introduced and, therribfr. Descartes<br />

rxpUincd the animal as a machine, and (2) The interpreutKXi he giwv<br />

<strong>to</strong> John LtKkr % imptracion—thai it came trom the fact thai he was a<br />

rrprrscnuiisT ol* bourgeois clam mferests Here arc two tncompacible<br />

rxpUiutiom <strong>to</strong>r the source ol' ideas The (um of these two expbiutionft. <strong>to</strong><br />

the cHri I that ideas itr baseil on material pfoductnr iotcrx, the <strong>to</strong>oh and<br />

tiuchinrs. is irmomibblr with the scvond. namely that clast inceirsts<br />

dctrrmine ideas<br />

Aiitmling <strong>to</strong> Marx. e\rr > -bod\- is ibcred—b%' the material productivr<br />

<strong>to</strong>nes—<strong>to</strong> think in such a «b-ay thai the rrsuk showi-s hn class inierrsts.You<br />

(hink in the was in whuh \xtut "inierrsts* forte voo <strong>to</strong> think, you think<br />

aiiording !*> sxnir class "inierr*t»" Your "iniercsts** »rc something<br />

iiulcpcndcnt «>l sxnir mind umH \xhu ideas Your "interrsis" exM in the<br />

\%itrtd jpart tnnii sxnir ideas i 'onsequcniK. the p<strong>to</strong>duction of >nour ideas is<br />

tuH truth Ik-<strong>to</strong>rr the appearance ol KaH Marx, the notion of truth had no<br />

meaning <strong>to</strong>r the \%hole his<strong>to</strong>rical pctkhI What the dunking ol'the people<br />

pnHliiird ui the past wa« ah»-a>-s "ideokig%-." not truth<br />

"lc\ ulei>Ktg\irt*' in hratue v^rtr ^^rll adsrrtised b>- NapolcOQ<br />

|l7r)«>-tK2l|. \sho laid esrrvihing vkxnili be all right in FraiKe but fer<br />

these "idc»>lt>:uc»* In 1HI2. Nap

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!