Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
1<br />
INTRODUCTION<br />
«*><br />
BoUhcvik Revolution in Russia in 1917, Lenin's Marxist regime imposed<br />
"war communism" m 1918. heralding it not only as an emergency device<br />
<strong>to</strong> fight the anti-communist White armies during the three-year civil war<br />
in Russia, but also as the great leap in<strong>to</strong> the flilly planned society. And<br />
following the end of the war in November 1918, new Social Democratic<br />
Party governments m Germany and Austria declared that the time for<br />
"socialization" and economic planning had finally arrived."<br />
In 1919, at a meeting of the Austrian Economic Society Mises<br />
delivered a paper on "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Com-<br />
monwealth" which was published in a leading German-language journal<br />
in 1920,*^ He incorporated this article as the centerpiece in a comprehen-<br />
sive treatise on collectivism that he published two years later in 1922, tided<br />
Socialism: An licononuc and Sodohi^ical Analysis in its English translation. '^<br />
Mises obser\'cd that most of the earher critics of socialism had rightly<br />
pointed out that a system of comprehensive government planning of<br />
economic affairs would create the worst tyranny ever experienced in<br />
human his<strong>to</strong>ry. With all production, employment, and distribution of<br />
output completely under the monopoly control of the State, the fate and<br />
fortune of every individual would be at the mercy of the political<br />
authority. In addition, these earlier opponents of socialism had cogently<br />
argued that with the end of private property and freedom of enterprise,<br />
individuals would lose much of the self-interested motivation for industry,<br />
innovation, and work effort that exists in a market economy.<br />
But, Mises said, what had not been thoroughly examined and<br />
challenged was whether a socialist economic system was even workable in<br />
practice. In other words, would the sociaUst central planners be able <strong>to</strong><br />
rationally and cfficiendy manage the everyday affairs of economic life?<br />
1 On the lailurr of these first attempts at nationalization and planning in Russia,<br />
Ckrnuny. and Amtru. see Arthur Shadwell, Vie Breakdomi of Socialism (London: Ernest<br />
Bcnn. I'i2(>).pp 2.V131<br />
12 Ludwp wn Mis«. "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" [1920] in<br />
F. A Hj>rk ed . Collninnsi Economic Platwing: Critical Studies on the Problem of Socialism<br />
(London: GeorKC Routledge. 1935). pp. 87-130; reprinted in Israel M. Kirzner,<br />
cd.Clasfus mAuslnjtt liivmmucs:A Sampling in the His<strong>to</strong>ry of a Tradition,Vol III (London:<br />
WiHum hckermg. l'W).pp.3-30.<br />
13 LudwR wn Mii«. Sooahsm.An Economic and Sociological Analysis (Indianapohs: Liberty<br />
CJassics 11922; English trans.. 1936. revised ed., 1953], 1981); Mises later restated and<br />
rrfined h» cnt.que of soculist central planning in Human Action: A Treatise on Economics<br />
(Imng<strong>to</strong>n-on-Hudson. N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education [1949; revised eds.,<br />
1963.1966) 1996). pp. 200-31. 689-715.