17.12.2012 Views

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

Marxism Unmasked from Delusion to Destruction.pdf 7471KB

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1<br />

INTRODUCTION<br />

«*><br />

BoUhcvik Revolution in Russia in 1917, Lenin's Marxist regime imposed<br />

"war communism" m 1918. heralding it not only as an emergency device<br />

<strong>to</strong> fight the anti-communist White armies during the three-year civil war<br />

in Russia, but also as the great leap in<strong>to</strong> the flilly planned society. And<br />

following the end of the war in November 1918, new Social Democratic<br />

Party governments m Germany and Austria declared that the time for<br />

"socialization" and economic planning had finally arrived."<br />

In 1919, at a meeting of the Austrian Economic Society Mises<br />

delivered a paper on "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Com-<br />

monwealth" which was published in a leading German-language journal<br />

in 1920,*^ He incorporated this article as the centerpiece in a comprehen-<br />

sive treatise on collectivism that he published two years later in 1922, tided<br />

Socialism: An licononuc and Sodohi^ical Analysis in its English translation. '^<br />

Mises obser\'cd that most of the earher critics of socialism had rightly<br />

pointed out that a system of comprehensive government planning of<br />

economic affairs would create the worst tyranny ever experienced in<br />

human his<strong>to</strong>ry. With all production, employment, and distribution of<br />

output completely under the monopoly control of the State, the fate and<br />

fortune of every individual would be at the mercy of the political<br />

authority. In addition, these earlier opponents of socialism had cogently<br />

argued that with the end of private property and freedom of enterprise,<br />

individuals would lose much of the self-interested motivation for industry,<br />

innovation, and work effort that exists in a market economy.<br />

But, Mises said, what had not been thoroughly examined and<br />

challenged was whether a socialist economic system was even workable in<br />

practice. In other words, would the sociaUst central planners be able <strong>to</strong><br />

rationally and cfficiendy manage the everyday affairs of economic life?<br />

1 On the lailurr of these first attempts at nationalization and planning in Russia,<br />

Ckrnuny. and Amtru. see Arthur Shadwell, Vie Breakdomi of Socialism (London: Ernest<br />

Bcnn. I'i2(>).pp 2.V131<br />

12 Ludwp wn Mis«. "Economic Calculation in the Socialist Commonwealth" [1920] in<br />

F. A Hj>rk ed . Collninnsi Economic Platwing: Critical Studies on the Problem of Socialism<br />

(London: GeorKC Routledge. 1935). pp. 87-130; reprinted in Israel M. Kirzner,<br />

cd.Clasfus mAuslnjtt liivmmucs:A Sampling in the His<strong>to</strong>ry of a Tradition,Vol III (London:<br />

WiHum hckermg. l'W).pp.3-30.<br />

13 LudwR wn Mii«. Sooahsm.An Economic and Sociological Analysis (Indianapohs: Liberty<br />

CJassics 11922; English trans.. 1936. revised ed., 1953], 1981); Mises later restated and<br />

rrfined h» cnt.que of soculist central planning in Human Action: A Treatise on Economics<br />

(Imng<strong>to</strong>n-on-Hudson. N.Y.: Foundation for Economic Education [1949; revised eds.,<br />

1963.1966) 1996). pp. 200-31. 689-715.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!