06.09.2018 Views

Understanding ASQ-CQA -Knowing The Ways

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Recommended values<br />

Process capability indices are constructed to express more desirable capability with increasingly higher values.<br />

Values near or below zero indicate processes operating off target (ũ far from T) or with high variation.<br />

(<strong>The</strong> target process mean is T, the estimated mean of the process is ũ and the estimated variability of the process (expressed as a standard deviation) σ. )<br />

Fixing values for minimum "acceptable" process capability targets is a matter of personal opinion, and what<br />

consensus exists varies by industry, facility, and the process under consideration. For example, in the<br />

automotive industry, the Automotive Industry Action Group sets forth guidelines in the Production Part Approval<br />

Process, 4th edition for recommended Cpk minimum values C pk = min[ USL−ũ<br />

, ũ−LSL<br />

] for critical-to-quality CTQ<br />

3σ 3σ<br />

process characteristics. However, these criteria are debatable and several processes may not be evaluated for<br />

capability just because they have not properly been assessed.<br />

Since the process capability is a function of the specification, the Process Capability Index is only as good as<br />

the specification. For instance, if the specification came from an engineering guideline without considering the<br />

function and criticality of the part, a discussion around process capability is useless, and would have more<br />

benefits if focused on what are the real risks of having a part borderline out of specification. <strong>The</strong> loss function of<br />

Taguchi better illustrates this concept.<br />

At least one academic expert recommends the following:<br />

(cont. ………)<br />

Charlie Chong/ Fion Zhang

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!